Prognostic Value of Tumor Regression Grade Based on Ryan Score in Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Adenocarcinoma of Esophagus

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
22
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2020
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
SPRINGER
Citação
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, v.27, n.4, p.1241-1247, 2020
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Purposes Tumor regression grade (TRG) of the primary tumor after neoadjuvant therapy is one of the most sensitive prognostic factors among patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer, although no TRG system is fully accepted. The Ryan score was proposed in 2005 to evaluate TRG in rectal cancer and could be adaptable for pathological evaluation of esophageal cancer. The objective of this study is to evaluate the prognostic value of the Ryan score for esophageal cancer in the setting of trimodal therapy. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study in which patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer, submitted to neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgical resection, were selected. One hundred thirty-four patients were selected. All tissue specimens were assessed as per the TRG system proposed by Ryan et al. Survival curves were assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Chi-square test or likelihood-ratio test was used for absolute and relative variables. Kruskal-Wallis and analysis of variance tests were used to assess significant differences on a continuous dependent variable by a categorical independent variable. Results Of the 134 included patients, 94 (70.1%) had squamous cell carcinoma, and 40 (29.9%) adenocarcinoma. Ryan score was correlated with histological type (p < 0.001), and clinical (p = 0.044) and pathological (p < 0.001) staging. Mean follow-up was 31.1 months. Multivariate analysis showed that Ryan score can safely predict survival, and systemic and lymphatic recurrence (p < 0.05). Conclusions Ryan score is an effective system to evaluate TRG and can predict risk for lymph node or distant metastasis, overall survival, and disease-free survival.
Palavras-chave
Referências
  1. Andreollo NA, 2018, ABCD-ARQ BRAS CIR DI, V31, DOI 10.1590/0102-672020180001e1405
  2. Buckstein M, 2018, DIS ESOPHAGUS, V31, DOI 10.1093/dote/dox148
  3. Chirieac LR, 2005, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V103, P1347, DOI 10.1002/cncr.20916
  4. Chiu CH, 2013, ANN SURG ONCOL, V20, P4245, DOI 10.1245/s10434-013-3139-7
  5. Dubben HH, 1998, RADIOTHER ONCOL, V47, P167, DOI 10.1016/S0167-8140(97)00215-6
  6. Ji KSY, 2019, J GASTROINTEST SURG, V23, P885, DOI 10.1007/s11605-018-4007-3
  7. Kim SH, 2016, CANCER RES TREAT, V48, P998, DOI 10.4143/crt.2015.254
  8. Lerttanatum N, 2019, J GASTROINTEST ONCOL, V10, P276, DOI 10.21037/jgo.2018.12.01
  9. MANDARD AM, 1994, CANCER, V73, P2680, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19940601)73:11<2680::AID-CNCR2820731105>3.0.CO;2-C
  10. Mota FC, 2018, INT J SURG, V54, P176, DOI 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.04.053
  11. Rice TW, 2017, ANN CARDIOTHORAC SUR, V6, P119, DOI 10.21037/acs.2017.03.14
  12. Ryan R, 2005, HISTOPATHOLOGY, V47, P141, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2005.02176.x
  13. Schneider PM, 2005, ANN SURG, V242, P684, DOI 10.1097/01.sla.0000186170.38348.7b
  14. Shapiro J, 2014, ANN SURG, V260, P807, DOI 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000966
  15. Takeda FR, 2018, INT SURG, V103, P214, DOI 10.9738/INTSURG-D-18-00041.1
  16. van der Werf LR, 2018, EUR J CANCER, V91, P76, DOI 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.12.009
  17. van Hagen P, 2012, NEW ENGL J MED, V366, P2074, DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa1112088