How to Distinguish Best Evidence from Bias: A Basic Guide to Understanding a Systematic Review

Imagem de Miniatura
Arquivos
art_CAMARGO_How_to_Distinguish_Best_Evidence_from_Bias_A_2020.PDF (841.59 KB)
Citações na Scopus
0
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2020
DOI
Scopus
Web of Science
PubMed
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
Autores
ROHRICH, Rod J.
Citação
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, v.8, n.2, article ID e2625, 8p, 2020
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
A systematic review is a powerful tool to synthesize and show concise and robust evidence for clinical practice. Thus, the inclusion of biased, low-quality studies should be avoided, for otherwise, the resulting systematic review will not reflect the best medical evidence. Because the methodology of systematic review is relatively new, this review aims to present basic rules to guide the reader's interpretation of a systematic review.
Palavras-chave
URI
https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/36647
Referências
  1. Akobeng AK, 2005, ARCH DIS CHILD, V90, P845, DOI 10.1136/adc.2004.058230
  2. [Anonymous], 1999, GREY LIT REP
  3. [Anonymous], 1984, LATIN AM CARIBBEAN C
  4. [Anonymous], 2015, COCHRANE CENTRAL REG
  5. [Anonymous], 2011, OP GREY REP
  6. [Anonymous], 2004, EU CLIN TRIALS REG
  7. [Anonymous], 2000, INT STANDARD RANDOMI
  8. Aslam AA, 2017, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD012040.pub2
  9. Berlin JA, 1994, ONLINE J CURR CLIN T
  10. Borenstein M, 2008, INTRO METAANALYSIS
  11. Collier R, 2015, CAN MED ASSOC J, V187, P640, DOI 10.1503/cmaj.109-5072
  12. Downs SH, 1998, J EPIDEMIOL COMMUN H, V52, P377, DOI 10.1136/jech.52.6.377
  13. El-Kadiki A, 2005, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V330, P871, DOI 10.1136/bmj.38399.495648.8F
  14. Embase, 1974, EXC MED DAT OVID
  15. InformedHealth.org, 2016, WHAT AR SYST REV MET
  16. Greenhalgh T, 1997, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V315, P243, DOI 10.1136/bmj.315.7102.243
  17. GUYATT G, 1992, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V268, P2420, DOI 10.1001/jama.1992.03490170092032
  18. Higgins JPT, 2004, STAT MED, V23, P1663, DOI 10.1002/sim.1752
  19. Higgins JPT, 2011, COCHRANE COLLABORATI, DOI 10.1002/9780470712184
  20. Higgins JPT, 2011, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V343, DOI 10.1136/bmj.d5928
  21. Higgins JPT, 2009, J R STAT SOC A STAT, V172, P137, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2008.00552.x
  22. Jadad AR, 1996, CONTROL CLIN TRIALS, V17, P1, DOI 10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4
  23. Kuss O, 2010, J THORAC CARDIOV SUR, V140, P829, DOI 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.12.022
  24. Liberati A, 2009, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V339, DOI 10.1136/bmj.b2700
  25. Moher D, 2010, INT J SURG, V8, P336, DOI 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007
  26. Montgomery P, 2019, BMJ GLOB HEALTH, V4, DOI 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000848
  27. National Institutes of Health, PUBMED
  28. Paez Arsenio, 2017, J Evid Based Med, V10, P233, DOI 10.1111/jebm.12266
  29. ROSENBAUM PR, 1983, BIOMETRIKA, V70, P41, DOI 10.1093/biomet/70.1.41
  30. Ryan R, 2016, GRADE QUALITY EVIDEN
  31. SACKETT DL, 1981, CAN MED ASSOC J, V124, P555
  32. Sedgwick P., 2013, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V346, pf1816
  33. Shamseer L, 2015, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V349, DOI [10.1136/bmj.i4086, 10.1136/bmj.g7647]
  34. SMITH R, 2014, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V348, DOI 10.1136/BMJ.G371
  35. Stavrou A, 2014, INTERACT CARDIOV TH, V18, P121, DOI 10.1093/icvts/ivt451
  36. Sterne JAC, 2016, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V355, DOI 10.1136/bmj.i4919
  37. Wells G, 2008, NEWCASTLE OTTAWA SCA
  38. World Health Organization, 2018, INT STAND CLIN TRIAL
  39. YUSUF S, 1991, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V266, P93, DOI 10.1001/jama.266.1.93
  40. Zhang LJ, 2018, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V88, P139, DOI 10.1016/j.gie.2018.03.001

Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MCG
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/ICHC
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/04