Superoxid dismutase activity in portal vein endothelium after partial liver resection

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
2
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2013
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
ACTA CIRURGICA BRASILEIRA
Citação
ACTA CIRURGICA BRASILEIRA, v.28, n.9, p.646-651, 2013
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
PURPOSE: To investigate superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity in the portal vein endothelium and malondialdehyde acid (MDA) production in liver tissue of rats submitted to 70% hepatectomy. METHODS: Twelve rats were distributed in two groups (hepatectomy and sham). Animals were sacrificed on post operative day 1 and portal vein, liver tissue and blood samples were collected. Portal vein SOD production was measured using lucigenin-amplified chemiluminescence assays. MDA measurement was used as an index of oxidative stress through the formation of TBARS (Thiobarbituric Acid Reactive Species). RESULTS: There was no difference in post operative bilirrubin, AST, ALT levels between groups. DHL level was higher in the hepatectomy group (p=0.01). MDA production in the remnant liver tissue and endothelial portal vein SOD activity were also significantly (p<0.05) elevated in the hepatectomy group when compared to control group. There was no correlation between MDA and SOD activity. SOD activity, on the other hand, showed a positive correlation with LDH level (p= 0.038) and MDA levels showed a positive correlation with AST and ALT levels (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: There is an increased production of malondialdehyde acid in liver tissue after partial hepatectomy and increased activity of superoxide dismutase in portal vein endothelium as well.
Palavras-chave
Hepatectomy, Oxidative Stress, Malondialdehyde, Superoxide Dismutase
Referências
  1. Abdalla EK, 2010, J SURG ONCOL, V102, P960, DOI 10.1002/jso.21654
  2. Barbeiro HV, 2009, BRAZ J MED BIOL RES, V42, P1050, DOI 10.1590/S0100-879X2009005000029
  3. Dahm F, 2005, AM J TRANSPLANT, V5, P2605, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.01081.x
  4. de Haas RJ, 2011, ANN SURG, V253, P1069, DOI 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318217e898
  5. Demetris AJ, 2006, AM J SURG PATHOL, V30, P986, DOI 10.1097/00000478-200608000-00009
  6. Diaz-Juarez J, 2011, LIVER TRANSPLANT, V17, P334, DOI 10.1002/lt.22238
  7. Fausto N, 2006, HEPATOLOGY, V43, pS45, DOI 10.1002/hep.20969
  8. Fondevila C, 2010, LIVER TRANSPLANT, V16, P364, DOI 10.1002/lt.21989
  9. Glanemann M, 2005, EUR SURG RES, V37, P335, DOI 10.1159/000090333
  10. Glanemann M, 2011, WORLD J GASTROENTERO, V17, P2199, DOI 10.3748/wjg.v17.i17.2199
  11. Guerra MT, 2011, HEPATOLOGY, V54, P296, DOI 10.1002/hep.24367
  12. House MG, 2010, J AM COLL SURGEONS, V210, P744, DOI 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.12.040
  13. Kitagawa M, 1999, SURG TODAY, V29, P137
  14. LAURINDO FRM, 1994, CIRC RES, V74, P700
  15. Melo ES, 2010, BRAZ J MED BIOL RES, V43, P57, DOI 10.1590/S0100-879X2009007500027
  16. Michalopoulos GK, 2010, AM J PATHOL, V176, P2, DOI 10.2353/ajpath.2010.090675
  17. Niiya T, 1999, J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, V6, P275, DOI 10.1007/s005340050118
  18. Ohtsuka M, 2000, J GASTROEN HEPATOL, V15, P880, DOI 10.1046/j.1440-1746.2000.02224.x
  19. Ozden TA, 2004, TOHOKU J EXP MED, V203, P253, DOI 10.1620/tjem.203.253
  20. Palmes Daniel, 2005, Transpl Int, V17, P862, DOI 10.1007/s00147-005-0809-9
  21. POMPELLA A, 1987, LIPIDS, V22, P206, DOI 10.1007/BF02537304
  22. Sato Y, 1997, SURG TODAY, V27, P518
  23. Sato Y, 1999, SURG TODAY, V29, P1
  24. Suzuki S, 1996, HEPATOLOGY, V24, P219
  25. TSAI JL, 1992, BIOCHEM INT, V28, P205
  26. Xu X, 2006, LIVER TRANSPLANT, V12, P621, DOI 10.1002/lt.20630
  27. Yao XM, 2009, DIGEST DIS SCI, V54, P774, DOI 10.1007/s10620-009-0715-6
  28. Yoshida N, 2007, J GASTROEN HEPATOL, V22, P2015, DOI 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2007.04960.x
  29. Zhou Li, 2004, Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int, V3, P209