Impact of telephone monitoring on cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy and gastrectomy

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
4
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2021
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
UNIV SAO PAOLO
Citação
REVISTA DA ESCOLA DE ENFERMAGEM DA USP, v.55, article ID e03679, 8p, 2021
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Objective: To evaluate telephone monitoring for symptoms, quality of life, distress, admissions to the emergency center and the satisfaction of cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy and gastrectomy. Method: Randomized controlled study in two groups, carried out at the Cancer Institute of the State of Sao Paulo; the intervention group received telephone monitoring for four moments after the surgery, while the control group received only institutional care. Results: Of the 81 patients evaluated, the domain most affected by quality of life was social relationships domain. Distress had no significant difference between groups and moments. In both groups, admissions to the emergency center were similar (p=0.539). Pain was the most reported symptom in telephone monitoring. There was statistical significance regarding patient satisfaction with monitoring (p=0.002). Conclusion: Telephone monitoring provided greater patient satisfaction in the intervention group, demonstrating the real impact of this process on the care of cancer patients.
Palavras-chave
Neoplasms, Gastrectomy, Esophagectomy, Telemonitoring, Quality of Life, Oncology Nursing
Referências
  1. Balducci L, 2005, NAT REV CANCER, V5, P655, DOI 10.1038/nrc1675
  2. Cardozo AS, 2017, REV ENFERM UFPE, V11, P3005, DOI 10.5205/REUOL.11064-98681-4-ED.1108201703
  3. Chaves Eliane Correa, 2007, Rev Gaucha Enferm, V28, P171
  4. de Albuquerque KA, 2014, REV BRAS ENFERM, V67, P744, DOI 10.1590/0034-7167.2014670511
  5. Delphino TM, 2016, REV MIN ENFERM, V20, pe937
  6. Eberhardt AC, 2015, REV ENFERM UFPE, V9, P1214, DOI [10.5205/reuol.8127-71183-1SM.0912201521, DOI 10.5205/REUOL.8127-71183-1SM.0912201521]
  7. da Mata LRF, 2014, REV LAT-AM ENFERM, V22, P337, DOI 10.1590/0104-1169.3314.2421
  8. FINLEY RJ, 1995, AM J SURG, V169, P471, DOI 10.1016/S0002-9610(99)80197-4
  9. Gradauskas Paulius, 2006, Medicina (Kaunas), V42, P187
  10. Landim Camila Aparecida Pinheiro, 2011, Rev. Gaúcha Enferm., V32, P554
  11. Lera AT, 2011, REV BRAS CLIN MED, V9, P112
  12. Mier AC, 2017, REV GAUCHA ENFERM, V38, DOI 10.1590/19831447.2017.02.62010
  13. Nicolussi AC, 2010, ACTA PAUL ENFERM, V23, P125, DOI 10.1590/S0103-21002010000100020
  14. Olivatto GM, 2015, REV ELET GESTAO SAUD, V6, DOI 10.18673/gs.v6i2.22487
  15. Pais-Ribeiro J., 2008, Psic., Saúde & Doenças, V9, P89
  16. Pereira DA, 2012, REV LAT-AM ENFERM, V20, P478, DOI 10.1590/S0104-11692012000300008
  17. Pereira L V, 1998, Rev Lat Am Enfermagem, V6, P77
  18. Pereira Maricilda Regina, 2013, Rev. Col. Bras. Cir., V40, P3, DOI 10.1590/S0100-69912013000100002
  19. Sousa Fátima Aparecida Emm Faleiros, 2002, Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem, V10, P446, DOI 10.1590/S0104-11692002000300020
  20. Sousa RM, 2017, REV ENFERM CTR OESTE, V7, pe1824, DOI [10.19175/recom.v7i0.1824, DOI 10.19175/RECOM.V7I0.1824]
  21. Stamm B, 2018, ACTA PAUL ENFERM, V31, P137, DOI 10.1590/1982-0194201800021
  22. Winkeljohn D, 2010, CLIN J ONCOL NURS, V14, P461, DOI 10.1188/10.CJON.461-466