Religious Affiliations Influence Health-Related and General Decision Making: A Brazilian Nationwide Survey

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
4
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2021
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
MDPI
Citação
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, v.18, n.6, article ID 2873, 9p, 2021
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Approximately 90% of the world's population is involved in some spiritual/religious practice, and this dimension has a relevant role in life. Many studies demonstrate the associations between spirituality/religiosity (S/R), and physical, mental, and social health. Systematic reviews have indicated positive associations; however, the mechanisms behind religious coping are not fully understood. The present study aimed to examine the role of religious affiliation in general (ordinary) and health-related decisions. A nationwide, population-based, cross-sectional study was conducted in Brazil using a self-administered online survey. How much religious affiliation influences decision making was investigated. A total of 1133 participants were included, who were classified as Catholics (43.9%), Evangelicals (18.7%), spiritualists (12.8%), non-religious (11.9%), and others (12.7%). Most participants (66.5%) believed that their religious affiliations had moderate to high influences on their decisions. Participants rated the influence as high in marriage (62.7%), in donations (60.1%), in volunteering (55%), in friendships (53.9%), and in work (50.5%). Concerning health-related decisions, the influence was rated as high in drug use (45.2%), in accepting medical recommendations (45%), and in smoking (43.2%). The influence of religious affiliation on general decision making was significantly correlated for dietary restrictions (r = 0.462), alcohol consumption (r = 0.458), drug use (r = 0.441), tobacco consumption (r = 0.456), and refusal of medical recommendations (r = 0.314). Improving the understanding of how a patient's beliefs, practices, and experiences affect their health may help healthcare practitioners to take into account religious considerations, not only regarding influences on habits but also regarding adherence to medical treatment advice.
Palavras-chave
nationwide, online survey, religion, sensitive information, public health
Referências
  1. Benjamins MR, 2006, INT J PSYCHIAT MED, V36, P69, DOI 10.2190/EKJ2-BCCT-8LT4-K01W
  2. Borras L, 2007, SCHIZOPHRENIA BULL, V33, P1238, DOI 10.1093/schbul/sbl070
  3. Brandon DM, 2014, BEHAV RES ACCOUNT, V26, P1, DOI 10.2308/bria-50651
  4. Connor KM, 2003, J TRAUMA STRESS, V16, P487, DOI 10.1023/A:1025762512279
  5. Craig BA, 2018, J RELIG HEALTH, V57, P994, DOI 10.1007/s10943-017-0495-9
  6. Goncalves JPD, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0186539
  7. Degenhardt L, 2007, DRUG ALCOHOL DEPEN, V90, P210, DOI 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.03.007
  8. Drabble L, 2016, DRUG ALCOHOL DEPEN, V161, P127, DOI 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.01.022
  9. Garcia G, 2013, J RELIG HEALTH, V52, P18, DOI 10.1007/s10943-012-9640-7
  10. Garrusi B, 2012, INT J PSYCHIAT MED, V43, P279, DOI 10.2190/PM.43.3.g
  11. Grossoehme DH, 2012, J HEALTH CARE CHAPL, V18, P110, DOI 10.1080/08854726.2012.720544
  12. Hussain M, 2019, J RELIG HEALTH, V58, P2263, DOI 10.1007/s10943-017-0434-9
  13. Kim KK, 2000, CANCER PRACT, V8, P223, DOI 10.1046/j.1523-5394.2000.85006.x
  14. Koenig H., 2012, SPIRITUALITY HLTH RE
  15. Koenig Harold G, 2012, ISRN Psychiatry, V2012, P278730, DOI 10.5402/2012/278730
  16. Kogan SM, 2005, PSYCHOL ADDICT BEHAV, V19, P382, DOI 10.1037/0893-164X.19.4.382
  17. Lucchetti G, 2014, INT J PSYCHIAT MED, V48, P199, DOI 10.2190/PM.48.3.e
  18. Lucchetti G, 2014, REV BRAS PSIQUIATR, V36, P4, DOI 10.1590/1516-4446-2012-1051
  19. Lucchetti G, 2013, EXPLORE-NY, V9, P159, DOI 10.1016/j.explore.2013.02.004
  20. Lucchetti G, 2012, J RELIG HEALTH, V51, P3, DOI 10.1007/s10943-011-9557-6
  21. Lucchetti G, 2012, HEMODIAL INT, V16, P89, DOI 10.1111/j.1542-4758.2011.00623.x
  22. McSherry W, 2013, J CLIN NURS, V22, P3170, DOI 10.1111/jocn.12411
  23. Moreira-Almeida A, 2014, REV BRAS PSIQUIATR, V36, P176, DOI 10.1590/1516-4446-2013-1255
  24. Peres MFP, 2018, SSM-POPUL HLTH, V6, P85, DOI 10.1016/j.ssmph.2018.08.007
  25. Peres M, 2018, J RELIG HEALTH, V57, P1842, DOI 10.1007/s10943-017-0400-6
  26. Richards P Scott, 2006, Eat Disord, V14, P401, DOI 10.1080/10640260600952548
  27. Sajjadi Homeira, 2015, Glob J Health Sci, V7, P367, DOI 10.5539/gjhs.v7n4p367
  28. Selman L, 2014, J PAIN SYMPTOM MANAG, V48, P518, DOI 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.10.020
  29. Smith Faune Taylor, 2003, Eat Disord, V11, P15, DOI 10.1080/10640260390167456-2199
  30. Summerskill W, 2015, LANCET, V386, P1709, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61104-7
  31. VanderWeele TJ, 2017, EUR J EPIDEMIOL, V32, P857, DOI 10.1007/s10654-017-0310-7
  32. Vieten C, 2013, PSYCHOL RELIG SPIRIT, V5, P129, DOI 10.1037/a0032699
  33. Vitorino LM, 2018, SCI REP-UK, V8, DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-35380-w
  34. Witkiewitz K, 2016, ALCOHOL RES-CURR REV, V38, P55