Development and Validation of a Brazilian Version of the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ)

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
30
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2013
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
Autores
Citação
PAIN MANAGEMENT NURSING, v.14, n.4, p.210-219, 2013
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
The aim of this study was to develop and validate a short form of the Brazilian version of McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ). Three hundred two patients with chronic pain filled out the validated Brazilian long form of the McGill Pain Questionnaire (LF-MPQ). Words chosen by >= 25% of the patients were selected to comprise the SF-MPQ. The Brazilian SF-MPQ consisted of 15 descriptors (8 sensory, 5 affective, and 2 evaluative) rated on a binary mode (present or absent). Four pain scores were derived by counting the words chosen by the patients for sensory, affective, evaluative, and total descriptors. The SF-MPQ showed poor internal consistency (KR-20 = 0.52) but possibly acceptable because it showed discriminant validity to discriminate patients presenting different levels and mechanisms of pain, and it was strongly correlated with the LF-MPQ. The low KR-20 coefficient could result from the small number of items. The Brazilian version of the SF-MPQ proved to be a useful instrument to evaluate the different qualities of pain. It is a reliable option to the long-form MPQ. (C) 2013 by the American Society for Pain Management Nursing
Palavras-chave
Referências
  1. Bennett M, 2001, PAIN, V92, P147, DOI 10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00482-6
  2. Bennett MI, 2005, J PAIN, V6, P149, DOI 10.1016/j.jpain.2004.11.007
  3. Bergh I, 2005, SCAND J CARING SCI, V19, P110, DOI 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2005.00331.x
  4. Bouhassira D, 2005, PAIN, V114, P29, DOI 10.1016/j.pain.2004.12.010
  5. BURCKHARDT CS, 1994, SCAND J RHEUMATOL, V23, P77
  6. DUDGEON D, 1993, J PAIN SYMPTOM MANAG, V8, P191, DOI 10.1016/0885-3924(93)90126-G
  7. Fayers P. M., 2000, QUALITY LIFE ASSESSM
  8. Ferreira K. A., 2010, SUPPORTIVE CARE CANC
  9. Georgoudis G, 2000, EUR J PAIN-LONDON, V4, P275, DOI 10.1053/eujp.2000.0186
  10. Grace VM, 2007, WOMEN HEALTH, V46, P81, DOI 10.1300/J013v46n04_05
  11. Grafton KV, 2005, CLIN J PAIN, V21, P73, DOI 10.1097/00002508-200501000-00009
  12. Hoffman JM, 2005, AM J SPEECH-LANG PAT, V14, P221, DOI 10.1044/1058-0360(2005/022)
  13. Janig W, 2006, PAIN, V120, P227, DOI 10.1016/j.pain.2005.11.015
  14. Kitisomprayoonkul Wasuwat, 2006, Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, V89, P846
  15. Lin C. P., 2011, EUROPEAN J PAIN
  16. Masedo AI, 2000, PAIN, V85, P451, DOI 10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00300-0
  17. McDonald D D, 2001, Clin Nurs Res, V10, P442, DOI 10.1177/10547730122159049
  18. McDowell I., 1996, MEASURING HLTH GUIDE
  19. MELZACK R, 1975, PAIN, V1, P277, DOI 10.1016/0304-3959(75)90044-5
  20. MELZACK R, 1987, PAIN, V30, P191, DOI 10.1016/0304-3959(87)91074-8
  21. Nunnaly J. C., 1994, PSYCHOMETRIC THEORY
  22. Passard A, 2007, BRAIN, V130, P2661, DOI 10.1093/brain/awm189
  23. Picarelli H, 2010, J PAIN, V11, P1203, DOI 10.1016/j.jpain.2010.02.006
  24. Pimenta C A, 1996, Rev Esc Enferm USP, V30, P473
  25. Santos JG, 2010, J PAIN, V11, P484, DOI 10.1016/j.jpain.2009.09.014
  26. SERLIN RC, 1995, PAIN, V61, P277, DOI 10.1016/0304-3959(94)00178-H
  27. Streiner D. L., 2003, HLTH MEASUREMENT SCA
  28. Wright KD, 2001, EUR J PAIN-LONDON, V5, P279, DOI 10.1053/eujp.2001.0243
  29. Zinke J., 2008, J PAIN S2, V9, P66, DOI 10.1016/j.jpain.2008.01.284