Validation of the Brazilian Version of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Rating Scale for Lower Extremity Bone Sarcoma

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
22
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2013
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
SPRINGER
Autores
Citação
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, v.471, n.12, p.4020-4026, 2013
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) rating scale is an English-language instrument used worldwide to assess functional evaluation of patients with musculoskeletal cancer. Despite its use in several studies in English-speaking countries, its validity for assessing patients in other languages is unknown. The translation and validation of widely used scales can facilitate the comparison across international patient samples. The objectives of this study were (1) to translate and culturally adapt the MSTS rating scale for functional evaluation in patients with lower extremity bone sarcomas to Brazilian Portuguese; (2) analyze its factor structure; and (3) test the reliability and (4) validity of this instrument. The MSTS rating scale for lower limbs was translated from English into Brazilian Portuguese. Translations were synthesized, translated back into English, and reviewed by a multidisciplinary committee for further implementation. The questionnaire was administered to 67 patients treated for malignant lower extremity bone tumors who were submitted to limb salvage surgery or amputation. They also completed a Brazilian version of the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS). Psychometric properties were analyzed including factor structure analysis, internal consistency, interobserver reliability, test-retest reliability, and construct validity (by comparing the adapted MSTS with TESS and discriminant validity). The MSTS rating scale for lower limbs was translated and culturally adapted to Brazilian Portuguese. The MSTS-BR proved to be adequate with only one latent dimension. The scale was also found to be reliable in a population that speaks Brazilian Portuguese showing good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.84) and reliability (test-retest reliability and interobserver agreement of 0.92 and 0.98, respectively). Validity of the Brazilian MSTS rating scale was proved by moderate with TESS and good discriminant validity. The Brazilian version of the MSTS rating scale was translated and validated. It is a reliable tool to assess functional outcome in patients with lower extremity bone sarcomas. It can be used for functional evaluation of Brazilian patients and crosscultural comparisons.
Palavras-chave
Referências
  1. Aaronson NK, 1998, J CLIN EPIDEMIOL, V51, P1055, DOI 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00097-3
  2. Alexander Michael, 2005, Health Qual Life Outcomes, V3, P67, DOI 10.1186/1477-7525-3-67
  3. Beaton D, 1998, RECOMMENDATIONS CROS
  4. Beaton DE, 2000, SPINE, V25, P3186, DOI 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
  5. CRONBACH LJ, 1951, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V16, P297
  6. Davis AM, 1996, QUAL LIFE RES, V5, P508, DOI 10.1007/BF00540024
  7. Dawson-Sanders B, 1994, BASIC CLIN BIOSTATIS
  8. ENNEKING WF, 1993, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P241
  9. Fabrigar LR, 1999, PSYCHOL METHODS, V4, P272, DOI 10.1037//1082-989X.4.3.272
  10. Fayers P. M., 2000, QUALITY LIFE ASSESSM
  11. Ginsberg JP, 2007, PEDIATR BLOOD CANCER, V49, P964, DOI 10.1002/pbc.21018
  12. Griesser MJ, 2012, AM J PHYS MED REHAB, V91, P24, DOI 10.1097/PHM.0b013e318232885a
  13. Kline P., 1994, EASY GUIDE FACTOR AN
  14. Lee SH, 2003, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P217, DOI 10.1097/01.blo.0000069896.31220.33
  15. MCHORNEY CA, 1994, MED CARE, V32, P40, DOI 10.1097/00005650-199401000-00004
  16. Muthen LK, 2007, MPLUS USERS GUIDE
  17. Ottaviani G, 2009, CANC TREAT, V152, P421, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-0284-9_23
  18. R-Development-Core-Team, 2008, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
  19. Saraiva D, 2008, PEDIATR BLOOD CANCER, V50, P1039, DOI 10.1002/pbc.21392
  20. SIMON MA, 1986, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V68A, P1331
  21. SPSS Inc, 1999, SPSS BAS 12 0 WIND U
  22. Talbot Max, 2005, Clin Orthop Relat Res, V438, P215
  23. Taylor MK, 2005, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V87A, P788, DOI 10.2106/JBJS.D.02080
  24. Wada T, 2007, J BONE JOINT SURG BR, V89B, P659, DOI 10.1302/0301-620X.89B5.18498