Global Burden of Orofacial Clefts and the World Surgical Workforce

Imagem de Miniatura
Arquivos
art_MASSENBURG_Global_Burden_of_Orofacial_Clefts_and_the_World_2021.PDF (1.78 MB)
Citações na Scopus
21
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2021
DOI
Scopus
Web of Science
PubMed
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
Autores
MASSENBURG, Benjamin B.
HOPPER, Richard A.
CROWE, Christopher S.
MORRISON, Shane D.
CALIS, Mert
DONKOR, Peter
KRESHANTI, Prasetyanugraheni
YUAN, Jie
Citação
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, v.148, n.4, p.568E-580E, 2021
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Background: Orofacial clefts are one of the most common congenital anomalies, but this disease burden is unevenly distributed worldwide. The authors hypothesize that this burden falls disproportionately on the countries with the smallest surgical workforce or lowest Socio-Demographic Index, rather than those with the highest prevalence of disease. Methods: The authors estimated the prevalence and disease burden of orofacial clefting from 1990 to 2017 in 195 countries using the Global Burden of Disease methodology. Prevalence and disability-adjusted life-years were compared geographically, temporally, and against the size of the national surgical workforce, Socio-Demographic Index, and income status. Linear and logarithmic regressions were performed. Results: In 2017, the prevalence of orofacial clefting was estimated to be 10.8 million people, representing a disease burden of 652,084 disability-adjusted life-years, with most of this disease burden experienced by low- and middle-income countries (94.1%). From 1990 to 2017, there was a decrease in disease burden (-70.2%) and prevalence (-4.9%). There was negative logarithmic association between surgical workforce size and disease burden, with a surgical workforce of greater than six providers per 100,000 population (3.6 disability-adjusted life-years versus 22.4 disability-adjusted life-years per 100,000 population; p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Burden of orofacial clefting has a strong negative association with the size of the surgical workforce, suggesting that strengthening the surgical workforce will help alleviate this burden. Epidemiologic data on countries and regions with inadequate surgical workforces and high disease burden should guide future research efforts and allocation of resources, and guide the treatment and educational goals of international charitable organizations.
Palavras-chave
URI
https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/41994
Referências
  1. [Anonymous], 2018, Cleft Palate Craniofac J, V55, P137, DOI 10.1177/1055665617739564
  2. Asante AD, 2012, HUM RESOUR HEALTH, V10, DOI 10.1186/1478-4491-10-10
  3. Berg E, 2016, JAMA PEDIATR, V170, P1063, DOI 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.1925
  4. Butali A, 2014, CLEFT PALATE-CRAN J, V51, P320, DOI 10.1597/12-135
  5. Dicker D, 2018, LANCET, V392, P1684, DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31891-9
  6. Elahi MM, 2004, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V113, P1548, DOI 10.1097/01.PRS.0000117184.77459.2B
  7. Eshete M, 2017, J CRANIOFAC SURG, V28, P334, DOI 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003234
  8. Flaxman AD., 2015, INTEGRATIVE METAREGR
  9. Fullman N, 2018, LANCET, V391, P2236, DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)30994-2
  10. Hughes CD, 2012, ANN PLAS SURG, V68, P222, DOI 10.1097/SAP.0b013e318209a5e8
  11. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, FIND GLOB BURD DIS S
  12. Ise A., 2019, CLEFT PALATE-CRAN J, V56, P639, DOI 10.1177/1055665618796018
  13. James SL, 2018, LANCET, V392, P1789, DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32279-7
  14. Kadir A, 2017, CLEFT PALATE-CRAN J, V54, P571, DOI 10.1597/15-221
  15. Kantar RS, 2019, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V143, P1165, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005416
  16. Kyu HH, 2018, LANCET, V392, P1859, DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32335-3
  17. Massenburg BB, 2017, BMJ GLOB HEALTH, V2, DOI 10.1136/bmjgh-2016-000226
  18. Massenburg BB, 2016, J CRANIOFAC SURG, V27, P1741, DOI 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003038
  19. Meara JG, 2015, LANCET, V386, P569, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60160-X
  20. Mossey PA, 2009, LANCET, V374, P1773, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60695-4
  21. MURRAY CJL, 1994, B WORLD HEALTH ORGAN, V72, P495
  22. Murray JC, 1997, CLEFT PALATE-CRAN J, V34, P7, DOI 10.1597/1545-1569(1997)034<0007:CAESOC>2.3.CO;2
  23. Panamonta Vipawee, 2015, Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, V98, pS11
  24. Patel Pratik B, 2012, Plast Surg Int, V2012, P892437, DOI 10.1155/2012/892437
  25. Saluja S, 2020, BMJ GLOB HEALTH, V5, DOI 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001535
  26. Schneider WJ., 2011, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V127, P2477, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182131d2a
  27. SHAW WC, 1992, CLEFT PALATE-CRAN J, V29, P413, DOI 10.1597/1545-1569(1992)029<0413:ASCISO>2.3.CO;2
  28. Shrime MG, 2015, WORLD J SURG, V39, P10, DOI 10.1007/s00268-014-2516-0
  29. Tanaka SA, 2012, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V129, p511E, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182402dd1
  30. The World Bank, SPEC SURG WORKF 1000
  31. The World Bank, GNI CAP ATL METH CUR
  32. World Health Organization, REP WHO M INT COLL R
  33. Wu RT, 2019, J CRANIOFAC SURG, V30, P1201, DOI 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005270

Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MCG
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/ICHC
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/04