2021 DORIS definition of remission in SLE: final recommendations from an international task force

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
100
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2021
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
Autores
VOLLENHOVEN, Ronald F. van
BERTSIAS, George
DORIA, Andrea
ISENBERG, David
MORAND, Eric
PETRI, Michelle A.
PONS-ESTEL, Bernardo A.
RAHMAN, Anisur
UGARTE-GIL, Manuel Francisco
VOSKUYL, Alexandre
Citação
LUPUS SCIENCE & MEDICINE, v.8, n.1, article ID e000538, 8p, 2021
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Objective To achieve consensus on a definition of remission in SLE (DORIS). Background Remission is the stated goal for both patient and caregiver, but consensus on a definition of remission has been lacking. Previously, an international task force consisting of patient representatives and medical specialists published a framework for such a definition, without reaching a final recommendation. Methods Several systematic literature reviews were performed and specific research questions examined in suitably chosen data sets. The findings were discussed, reformulated as recommendations and voted on. Results Based on data from the literature and several SLE-specific data sets, a set of recommendations was endorsed. Ultimately, the DORIS Task Force recommended a single definition of remission in SLE, based on clinical systemic lupus erythematosus disease activitiy index (SLEDAI)=0, Evaluator's Global Assessment <0.5 (0-3), prednisolone 5 mg/day or less, and stable antimalarials, immunosuppressives, and biologics. Conclusion The 2021 DORIS definition of remission in SLE is recommended for use in clinical care, education, and research including clinical trials and observational studies.
Palavras-chave
lupus erythematosus, systemic, outcome assessment, healthcare, therapeutics
Referências
  1. Alarcon GS, 2019, LUPUS, V28, P423, DOI 10.1177/0961203319826693
  2. Ugarte-Gil MF, 2019, RMD OPEN, V5, DOI 10.1136/rmdopen-2019-000955
  3. Ugarte-Gil MF, 2017, ANN RHEUM DIS, V76, P2071, DOI 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211814
  4. Kandane-Rathnayake R, 2019, INT J RHEUM DIS, V22, P425, DOI 10.1111/1756-185X.13431
  5. Petri M, 2018, ARTHRITIS RHEUMATOL, V70, P1790, DOI 10.1002/art.40571
  6. Pons-Estel G, 2020, ARTHRITIS RHEUMATOL, V72
  7. Reategui-Sokolova C, 2019, LUPUS, V28, P1344, DOI 10.1177/0961203319876998
  8. Saccon F, 2020, ANN RHEUM DIS, V79, P943, DOI 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217070
  9. Tsang-A-Sjoe MWP, 2019, RHEUMATOLOGY, V58, P628, DOI 10.1093/rheumatology/key349
  10. Tsang-A-Sjoe MWP, 2017, RHEUMATOLOGY, V56, P121, DOI 10.1093/rheumatology/kew377
  11. Ugarte-Gil MF, 2020, ANN RHEUM DIS, V79, P1518, DOI 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-eular.2037
  12. Ugarte-Gil MF, 2020, JCR-J CLIN RHEUMATOL, V26, P69
  13. Ugarte-Gil MF, 2020, ARTHRIT CARE RES, V72, P1159, DOI 10.1002/acr.24009
  14. Ugarte-Gil MF., 2020, ARTHRITIS RHEUMATOL, V72
  15. van Vollenhoven R, 2019, NAT REV RHEUMATOL, V15, P180, DOI 10.1038/s41584-019-0170-5
  16. van Vollenhoven R, 2017, ANN RHEUM DIS, V76, P554, DOI 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209519
  17. van Vollenhoven RF, 2014, ANN RHEUM DIS, V73, P958, DOI 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-205139
  18. Wilhelm TR, 2017, ANN RHEUM DIS, V76, P547, DOI 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209489
  19. Zen M, 2017, ANN RHEUM DIS, V76, P562, DOI 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210154
  20. Zen M, 2015, ANN RHEUM DIS, V74, P2117, DOI 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207347
  21. Zhang AD, 2019, RHEUM DIS CLIN N AM, V45, P505, DOI 10.1016/j.rdc.2019.07.002