Follow-up of the air pollution and the human male-to-female ratio analysis in Sao Paulo, Brazil: a times series study

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
13
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2013
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
Autores
Citação
BMJ OPEN, v.3, n.7, article ID e002552, 6p, 2013
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Objectives In order to assess if ambient air pollution in urban areas could be related to alterations in male/female ratio this study objectives to evaluate changes in ambient particulate matter (PM10) concentrations after implementation of pollution control programmes in SAo Paulo city and the secondary sex ratio (SRR). Design and methods A time series study was conducted. SAo Paulo's districts were stratified according to the PM10 concentrations levels and were used as a marker of overall air pollution. The male ratio was chosen to represent the secondary sex ratio (SSR=total male birth/total births). The SSR data from each area was analysed according to the time variation and PM10 concentration areas using descriptive statistics. The strength association between annual average of PM10 concentration and SSR was performed through exponential regression, and it was adopted as a statistical significance level of p<0.05. Results The exponential regression showed a negative and significant association between PM10 and SSR. SSR varied from 51.4% to 50.7% in SAo Paulo in the analysed period (2000-2007). Considering the PM10 average concentration in SAo Paulo city of 44.72g/m(3) in the study period, the SSR decline reached almost 4.37%, equivalent to 30934 less male births. Conclusions Ambient levels of PM10 are negatively associated with changes in the SSR. Therefore, we can speculate that higher levels of particulate pollution could be related to increased rates of female births.
Palavras-chave
air pollution, sex ratio, reproductive health, environmental health, SA o pound Paulo
Referências
  1. Andrade MD, 2012, AIR QUAL ATMOS HLTH, V5, P79, DOI 10.1007/s11869-010-0104-5
  2. Boklage CE, 2005, HUM REPROD, V20, P583, DOI 10.1093/humrep/deh662
  3. Borman SM, 2000, TOXICOL APPL PHARM, V167, P191, DOI 10.1006/taap.2000.9006
  4. Calderon-Garciduenas L, 2011, BRAIN COGNITION, V77, P345, DOI 10.1016/j.bandc.2011.09.006
  5. Carvalho-Oliveira A, 2005, ENVIRON RES, V98, P1
  6. CETESB, 2012, QUAL AR EST SAO PAUL
  7. Davis DL, 1998, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V279, P1018, DOI 10.1001/jama.279.13.1018
  8. Dockery DW, 2009, ANN EPIDEMIOL, V19, P257, DOI 10.1016/j.annepidem.2009.01.018
  9. Gouveia N, 2004, J EPIDEMIOL COMMUN H, V58, P11, DOI 10.1136/jech.58.1.11
  10. Hansen D, 1999, BRIT MED J, V319, P548
  11. James WH, 2011, J BIOSOC SCI, V43, P167, DOI 10.1017/S0021932010000660
  12. James WH, 2012, J THEOR BIOL, V310, P183, DOI 10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.06.038
  13. Lichtenfels AJFC, 2007, FERTIL STERIL, V87, P230, DOI 10.1016/j.fernstert.2006.06.023
  14. LLOYD OL, 1985, BRIT J IND MED, V42, P475
  15. MATTISON DR, 1989, TOXICOL PATHOL, V17, P364
  16. Miranda RM, 2012, AIR QUAL ATMOS HLTH, V5, P63, DOI 10.1007/S11869-010-0124-1
  17. Mocarelli P, 2008, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V116, P70, DOI 10.1289/ehp.10399
  18. Mohorovic L, 2010, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V7, P4203, DOI 10.3390/ijerph7124203
  19. Perin PM, 2010, J ASSIST REPROD GEN, V27, P371, DOI 10.1007/s10815-010-9419-2
  20. Pires A, 2011, INHAL TOXICOL, V23, P237, DOI 10.3109/08958378.2011.563508
  21. Pope CA, 2009, NEW ENGL J MED, V360, P376, DOI 10.1056/NEJMsa0805646
  22. Ryan JJ, 2002, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V110, pA699
  23. Sanchez-Ccoyllo OR, 2009, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V149, P241, DOI 10.1007/s10661-008-0198-5
  24. Schnorr TM, 2001, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V109, P1127, DOI 10.2307/3454859
  25. Schwartz Joel, 2006, Clin Occup Environ Med, V5, P837
  26. Terrell ML, 2011, EMERG HLTH THREATS J, P4
  27. Tragaki A, 2009, POPUL ENVIRON, V30, P114, DOI 10.1007/s11111-009-0079-z
  28. van den Hooven EH, 2012, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V120, P150, DOI 10.1289/ehp.1003316
  29. WALDRON I, 1993, SOC SCI MED, V36, P451, DOI 10.1016/0277-9536(93)90407-U
  30. Watanabe N, 2001, ENV HLTH PERSPECT, P109
  31. WILLIAMS FLR, 1992, INT J EPIDEMIOL, V21, P311, DOI 10.1093/ije/21.2.311
  32. Yang CY, 2000, B ENVIRON CONTAM TOX, V65, P126