Incidental Node Metastasis as an Independent Factor of Worse Disease-Free Survival in Patients with Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
3
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2023
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
MDPI
Citação
CANCERS, v.15, n.3, article ID 943, 20p, 2023
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Simple Summary Papillary thyroid cancer is treated mainly by thyroidectomy surgery. The surrounding lymph nodes are not usually resected unless it is known before surgery that they are metastatic, and then all adjacent lymph nodes are resected (named the central compartment neck dissection). However, some lymph nodes could be incidentally resected with the thyroid, sometimes containing metastasis, but this does not mean that the central compartment neck dissection was performed properly. This study aimed to test whether these patients with incidental metastatic nodes had higher treatment failure rates. We found that they indeed had higher rates of treatment failure, even when compared to patients with clinically evident central compartment node metastasis that were submitted to proper neck dissection. We suggest that these patients must be closely followed to detect signs of treatment failure early and to provide prompt treatment. Introduction: Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) have high node metastasis rates. Occasionally after thyroidectomy, the pathological report reveals node metastasis unintentionally resected. The present study aimed to evaluate the prognosis of these patients. Methods: A retrospective cohort of patients submitted to thyroidectomy with or without central compartment neck dissection (CCND) due to PTC with a minimum follow-up of five years. Results: A total of 698 patients were included: 320 Nx, 264 pN0-incidental, 37 pN1a-incidental, 32 pN0-CCND and 45 pN1a-CCND. Patients with node metastasis were younger, had larger tumors, higher rates of microscopic extra-thyroidal extension, and angiolymphatic invasion and most received radioiodine therapy. Treatment failure was higher in patients pN1a-incidental and pN1a-CCND (32% and 16%, respectively; p < 0.001-Chi-square test). Disease-free survival (DFS) was lower in patients pN1a-incidental compared to patients Nx and pN0-incidental (p < 0.001 vs. Nx and pN0-incidental and p = 0.005 vs. pN0-CCND) but similar when compared to patients pN1a-CCND (p = 0.091)-Log-Rank test. Multivariate analysis demonstrated as independent risk factors: pT4a (HR = 5.524; 95%CI: 1.380-22.113; p = 0.016), pN1a-incidental (HR = 3.691; 95%CI: 1.556-8.755; p = 0.003), microscopic extra-thyroidal extension (HR = 2.560; 95%CI: 1.303-5.030; p = 0.006) and angiolymphatic invasion (HR = 2.240; 95%CI: 1.077-4.510; p = 0.030). Conclusion: Patients that were pN1a-incidental were independently associated with lower DFS.
Palavras-chave
papillary thyroid carcinoma, lymph node dissection, metastasis, incidental findings, prognosis
Referências
  1. Agrawal N, 2017, HEAD NECK-J SCI SPEC, V39, P1269, DOI 10.1002/hed.24715
  2. Bergdorf K, 2019, ENDOCR-RELAT CANCER, V26, P601, DOI 10.1530/ERC-19-0074
  3. Chen L, 2018, WORLD J SURG, V42, P2846, DOI 10.1007/s00268-018-4547-4
  4. da Silva RM, 2020, SPECTROCHIM ACTA A, V228, DOI 10.1016/j.saa.2019.117693
  5. Danilovic DLS, 2020, THYROID, V30, P1008, DOI 10.1089/thy.2019.0753
  6. Danilovic DLS, 2014, EUR J ENDOCRINOL, V170, P619, DOI 10.1530/EJE-13-0944
  7. Dismukes J, 2021, J SURG RES, V264, P230, DOI 10.1016/j.jss.2021.02.035
  8. Dobrinja C, 2017, INT J SURG, V41, pS40, DOI 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.01.113
  9. Dong Y, 2021, ONCOL LETT, V21, DOI 10.3892/ol.2021.12449
  10. Dutenhefner SE, 2013, THYROID, V23, P1541, DOI 10.1089/thy.2012.0304
  11. Edge S.B., 2017, AJCC CANC STAGING MA
  12. Filetti S, 2019, ANN ONCOL, V30, P1856, DOI 10.1093/annonc/mdz400
  13. Gan SY, 2021, COMB CHEM HIGH T SCR, V24, P1395, DOI 10.2174/1386207323999201103205745
  14. Giordano D, 2017, AM J OTOLARYNG, V38, P576, DOI 10.1016/j.amjoto.2017.06.004
  15. Goepfert RP, 2018, EJSO-EUR J SURG ONC, V44, P327, DOI 10.1016/j.ejso.2017.09.004
  16. Hall CM, 2018, INT J SURG, V56, P102, DOI 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.06.015
  17. Hall CM, 2016, SURGERY, V160, P1049, DOI 10.1016/j.surg.2016.06.042
  18. Haugen BR, 2016, THYROID, V26, P1, DOI 10.1089/thy.2015.0020
  19. Huang Y, 2020, CLIN EXP MED, V20, P515, DOI 10.1007/s10238-020-00642-3
  20. Kluijfhout WP, 2017, J SURG ONCOL, V116, P275, DOI 10.1002/jso.24680
  21. Li GP, 2022, SURGERY, V171, P368, DOI 10.1016/j.surg.2021.07.018
  22. Ma B, 2016, INT J SURG, V28, P153, DOI 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.02.093
  23. Pizzato M, 2022, LANCET DIABETES ENDO, V10, P264, DOI 10.1016/S2213-8587(22)00035-3
  24. Pontius LN, 2016, ENDOCR-RELAT CANCER, V23, P555, DOI 10.1530/ERC-16-0123
  25. Pyo JS, 2018, J PATHOL TRANSL MED, V52, P331, DOI 10.4132/jptm.2018.08.07
  26. Qu HJ, 2018, ENDOCR J, V65, P113, DOI 10.1507/endocrj.EJ17-0110
  27. Robinson TJ, 2016, J CLIN ONCOL, V34, P3434, DOI 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.6437
  28. Danilovic DLS, 2018, HEAD NECK-J SCI SPEC, V40, P1271, DOI 10.1002/hed.25105
  29. Sezer A, 2017, BOSNIAN J BASIC MED, V17, P144, DOI 10.17305/bjbms.2017.1924
  30. Shi X, 2018, ANN SURG ONCOL, V25, P2316, DOI 10.1245/s10434-018-6542-2
  31. Shu XJ, 2021, FRONT ONCOL, V11, DOI 10.3389/fonc.2021.727984
  32. Sun W, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0139021
  33. Viola D, 2015, J CLIN ENDOCR METAB, V100, P1316, DOI 10.1210/jc.2014-3825
  34. Wang LY, 2016, CLIN ENDOCRINOL, V84, P292, DOI 10.1111/cen.12828
  35. Xue S, 2016, ASIAN J SURG, V39, P131, DOI 10.1016/j.asjsur.2015.03.015
  36. Yoo BJ, 2019, FRONT ENDOCRINOL, V10, DOI 10.3389/fendo.2019.00172
  37. Zhao WJ, 2017, EJSO-EUR J SURG ONC, V43, P1989, DOI 10.1016/j.ejso.2017.07.008