Cognitive and emotional factors influence specific domains of postural control in individuals with moderate-to-severe Parkinson's disease

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
1
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2023
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
Autores
OLIVEIRA, Claudia Eunice Neves de
COELHO, Daniel Boari
SOUZA, Caroline Ribeiro de
MARQUESINI, Raquel
SILVA-BATISTA, Carla
BITIATI, Adriana Tanigawa
TEIXEIRA, Luis Augusto
LIMA-PARDINI, Andrea Cristina de
Citação
GAIT & POSTURE, v.101, p.66-72, 2023
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Introduction: Cognition and emotional state are domains that highly interfere with postural control in individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD). This study aims to find associations between executive function, anxiety, depression, and reactive and anticipatory postural control domains in individuals with moderate-to-severe Parkinson's disease.Methods: In this study, 34 individuals with PD while on medication were thoroughly assessed for postural control in perturbed, quiet standing and stepping. We performed multiple linear stepwise regressions using postural variables as dependent and cognitive/emotional as independent variables.Results: The results showed that cognitive flexibility explained 23 % of anticipatory postural adjustments (APA) duration, inhibitory control explained 42 % of instability on a malleable surface, anxiety explained 21 % of APA amplitude, and 38 % of reactive postural response amplitude.Conclusion: Our results highlight the impact of emotional and cognitive states on particular domains of postural control in individuals with PD while on medication. These results may have significant implications for future treatments, mainly considering the predictors for postural control domains, which were consistent with the assumption that impairments in affective and executive domains underlie posture. As we have shown that cognitive and emotional states influence postural control domains in individuals with PD, this should be taken into account in rehabilitation protocols
Palavras-chave
Movement disorders, Anticipatory postural adjustments, Reactive responses, Cognitive disorders
Referências
  1. Adkin AL, 2003, MOVEMENT DISORD, V18, P496, DOI 10.1002/mds.10396
  2. Adkin AL, 2018, FRONT NEUROL, V9, DOI 10.3389/fneur.2018.00789
  3. Andersson G, 2002, BRAIN RES BULL, V58, P135, DOI 10.1016/S0361-9230(02)00770-0
  4. Araujo-Silva F, 2022, BRAIN RES, V1775, DOI 10.1016/j.brainres.2021.147727
  5. Avanzino L, 2018, GAIT POSTURE, V65, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.06.171
  6. Balaban CD, 2002, PHYSIOL BEHAV, V77, P469, DOI 10.1016/S0031-9384(02)00935-6
  7. Carpenter MG, 2004, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V92, P3255, DOI 10.1152/jn.01139.2003
  8. Coelho DB, 2021, J GERONTOL A-BIOL, V76, P216, DOI 10.1093/gerona/glaa125
  9. Cohen RG, 2017, FRONT HUM NEUROSCI, V11, DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00060
  10. Cohen RG, 2014, J PARKINSON DIS, V4, P111, DOI 10.3233/JPD-130221
  11. Cohen RG, 2011, J GERONTOL A-BIOL, V66, P705, DOI 10.1093/gerona/glr054
  12. de Lima-Pardini AC, 2020, NEUROIMAGE-CLIN, V28, DOI 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102461
  13. Dormann CF, 2013, ECOGRAPHY, V36, P27, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07348.x
  14. Jacobs JV, 2009, NEUROSCIENCE, V164, P877, DOI 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.08.002
  15. Jazaeri SZ, 2018, PLOS ONE, V13, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0192168
  16. Kitaoka K, 2004, NEUROSCI LETT, V370, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.07.088
  17. Kortte Kathleen Bechtold, 2002, Appl Neuropsychol, V9, P106, DOI 10.1207/S15324826AN0902_5
  18. Lira JLO, 2020, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V598, P1611, DOI 10.1113/JP279068
  19. Lord S, 2020, J PARKINSON DIS, V10, P631, DOI 10.3233/JPD-191813
  20. Maki BE, 1997, PHYS THER, V77, P488, DOI 10.1093/ptj/77.5.488
  21. Martens KAE, 2016, GAIT POSTURE, V49, P431, DOI 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.07.182
  22. Naismith SL, 2010, MOVEMENT DISORD, V25, P1000, DOI 10.1002/mds.23005
  23. Nieuwboer A, 2009, GAIT POSTURE, V30, P459, DOI 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.07.108
  24. Nutt JG, 2011, LANCET NEUROL, V10, P734, DOI 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70143-0
  25. Peterson DS, 2016, PHYS THER, V96, P659, DOI 10.2522/ptj.20140603
  26. Rankin JK, 2000, J GERONTOL A-BIOL, V55, pM112, DOI 10.1093/gerona/55.3.M112
  27. Redfern MS, 2009, J GERONTOL B-PSYCHOL, V64, P569, DOI 10.1093/geronb/gbp060
  28. Rochester L, 2004, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V85, P1578, DOI 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.01.025
  29. Rothman KJ, 2014, J GEN INTERN MED, V29, P1060, DOI 10.1007/s11606-013-2755-z
  30. Schlenstedt C, 2016, PARKINSONISM RELAT D, V24, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2015.12.011
  31. Stocchi F, 2000, J NEUROL, V247, P114
  32. Sumec R, 2017, J NEURAL TRANSM, V124, P369, DOI 10.1007/s00702-016-1652-0
  33. Takakusaki K, 2017, J MOV DISORD, V10, P1
  34. Vandenbossche J, 2012, NEUROSCIENCE, V206, P144, DOI 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.12.048
  35. Vandenbossche J, 2013, FRONT HUM NEUROSCI, V6, DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00356
  36. Visser JE, 2010, NEUROSCIENCE, V168, P387, DOI 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.03.068
  37. Weiss D, 2020, BRAIN, V143, P14, DOI 10.1093/brain/awz314
  38. Zakzanis KK, 2005, NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, V43, P1878, DOI 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.03.013