Detecting limited health literacy in Brazil: development of a multidimensional screening tool

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
22
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2014
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
OXFORD UNIV PRESS
Citação
HEALTH PROMOTION INTERNATIONAL, v.29, n.1, p.5-14, 2014
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Screening questions have been proposed as practical tools for detecting limited functional health literacy, but have achieved only moderate accuracy in previous studies. We hypothesized that a combination of screening questions and demographic characteristics could better predict a patients functional health literacy. Three hundred and twenty-two hospital users from So Paulo, Brazil, were interviewed for demographic information and answered questions about literacy habits and perceived difficulties. The Short Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults was used to classify individuals as having adequate or limited functional health literacy. Of the 322 participants, 102 (31.7) presented limited functional health literacy. The final logistic model included six predictors. The three demographic variables were educational attainment, mothers educational attainment and major lifetime occupation (manual or non-manual). The three questions concerned frequency of use of computers, difficulty with writing that have precluded the individual from getting a better job and difficulty reading the subtitles while watching a foreign movie. A simple score was derived to constitute a practical tool we named the Multidimensional Screener of Functional Health Literacy (MSFHL). The sensitivity of the MSFHL in detecting limited functional health literacy was 81.4 and the specificity was 87.7, with an area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.93 (95 CI 0.890.95). The MSFHL was better than educational attainment in accurately classifying functional health literacy status (p 0.0018). We have developed a screening tool based on three demographic characteristics and three simple questions which provides an accurate prediction of a patients functional health literacy level.
Palavras-chave
health literacy, validity, screening
Referências
  1. Apolinario D, 2012, REV SAUDE PUBL, V46, P702
  2. Baker DW, 1999, PATIENT EDUC COUNS, V38, P33, DOI 10.1016/S0738-3991(98)00116-5
  3. Barber MN, 2009, HEALTH PROMOT INT, V24, P252, DOI 10.1093/heapro/dap022
  4. Berkman ND, 2011, ANN INTERN MED, V155, P97, DOI [10.7326/0003-4819-155-2-201107190-00005, 10.1059/0003-4819-155-2-201107190-00005]
  5. Berkman ND, 2010, J HEALTH COMMUN, V15, P9, DOI 10.1080/10810730.2010.499985
  6. Brucki S. M., 2011, DEMENT NEUROPSYCHOL, V5, P26
  7. Brucki SMD, 2003, ARQ NEURO-PSIQUIAT, V61, P777, DOI 10.1590/S0004-282X2003000500014
  8. Carthery-Goulart MT, 2009, REV SAUDE PUBL, V43, P631, DOI 10.1590/S0034-89102009005000031
  9. Chew LD, 2008, J GEN INTERN MED, V23, P561, DOI 10.1007/s11606-008-0520-5
  10. Chew LD, 2004, FAM MED, V36, P588
  11. Connor M, 2013, PATIENT EDUC COUNS, V90, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.pec.2012.08.018
  12. DELONG ER, 1988, BIOMETRICS, V44, P837, DOI 10.2307/2531595
  13. FOLSTEIN MF, 1975, J PSYCHIAT RES, V12, P189, DOI 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
  14. Gazmararian JA, 1999, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V281, P545, DOI 10.1001/jama.281.6.545
  15. Hanchate AD, 2008, J GEN INTERN MED, V23, P1561, DOI 10.1007/s11606-008-0699-5
  16. Jacinto AF, 2011, CLINICS, V66, P1379, DOI 10.1590/S1807-59322011000800012
  17. Jeppesen KM, 2009, ANN FAM MED, V7, P24, DOI 10.1370/afm.919
  18. Kelly PA, 2007, PATIENT EDUC COUNS, V66, P119, DOI 10.1016/j.pec.2006.10.007
  19. Martin LT, 2009, J GEN INTERN MED, V24, P1211, DOI 10.1007/s11606-009-1105-7
  20. Morris Nancy S, 2006, BMC Fam Pract, V7, P21, DOI 10.1186/1471-2296-7-21
  21. Nutbeam D, 1998, HEALTH PROMOT INT, V13, P349, DOI 10.1093/heapro/13.4.349
  22. Nutbeam D, 2000, HEALTH PROMOT INT, V15, P259, DOI 10.1093/heapro/15.3.259
  23. Ohl M, 2010, AIDS PATIENT CARE ST, V24, P623, DOI 10.1089/apc.2009.0319
  24. PARKER RM, 1995, J GEN INTERN MED, V10, P537, DOI 10.1007/BF02640361
  25. Rudd RE, 2007, AM J HEALTH BEHAV, V31, pS8
  26. Sarkar U, 2011, J GEN INTERN MED, V26, P265, DOI 10.1007/s11606-010-1552-1
  27. Schoon I, 2010, PEDIATRICS, V125, pE459, DOI 10.1542/peds.2008-2111
  28. Sheridan SL, 2011, J HEALTH COMMUN, V16, P30, DOI 10.1080/10810730.2011.604391
  29. Sorensen K, 2012, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V12, DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-80
  30. Steyerberg EW, 1999, J CLIN EPIDEMIOL, V52, P935, DOI 10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00103-1
  31. Taylor WL, 1953, JOURNALISM QUART, V30, P415
  32. Wallace LS, 2006, J GEN INTERN MED, V21, P874, DOI 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00532.x
  33. Williams Mark V., 1995, JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association), V274, P1677, DOI 10.1001/jama.274.21.1677
  34. YOUDEN WJ, 1950, CANCER, V3, P32, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(1950)3:1<32::AID-CNCR2820030106>3.0.CO;2-3