Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/5482
Title: Predictive models for mutations in mismatch repair genes: implication for genetic counseling in developing countries
Authors: SANTOS, Erika Maria MonteiroVALENTIN, Mev DominguezCARNEIRO, FelipeOLIVEIRA, Ligia Petrolini deFERREIRA, Fabio de OliveiraAGUIAR JUNIOR, SamuelNAKAGAWA, Wilson ToshihikoGOMY, IsraelFERRAZ, Victor Evangelista de FariaSILVA JUNIOR, Wilson Araujo daCARRARO, Dirce MariaROSSI, Benedito Mauro
Citation: BMC CANCER, v.12, article ID 64, 9p, 2012
Abstract: Background: Lynch syndrome (LS) is the most common form of inherited predisposition to colorectal cancer (CRC), accounting for 2-5% of all CRC. LS is an autosomal dominant disease characterized by mutations in the mismatch repair genes mutL homolog 1 (MLH1), mutS homolog 2 (MSH2), postmeiotic segregation increased 1 (PMS1), post-meiotic segregation increased 2 (PMS2) and mutS homolog 6 (MSH6). Mutation risk prediction models can be incorporated into clinical practice, facilitating the decision-making process and identifying individuals for molecular investigation. This is extremely important in countries with limited economic resources. This study aims to evaluate sensitivity and specificity of five predictive models for germline mutations in repair genes in a sample of individuals with suspected Lynch syndrome. Methods: Blood samples from 88 patients were analyzed through sequencing MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 genes. The probability of detecting a mutation was calculated using the PREMM, Barnetson, MMRpro, Wijnen and Myriad models. To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the models, receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed. Results: Of the 88 patients included in this analysis, 31 mutations were identified: 16 were found in the MSH2 gene, 15 in the MLH1 gene and no pathogenic mutations were identified in the MSH6 gene. It was observed that the AUC for the PREMM (0.846), Barnetson (0.850), MMRpro (0.821) and Wijnen (0.807) models did not present significant statistical difference. The Myriad model presented lower AUC (0.704) than the four other models evaluated. Considering thresholds of >= 5%, the models sensitivity varied between 1 (Myriad) and 0.87 (Wijnen) and specificity ranged from 0 (Myriad) to 0.38 (Barnetson). Conclusions: The Barnetson, PREMM, MMRpro and Wijnen models present similar AUC. The AUC of the Myriad model is statistically inferior to the four other models.
Appears in Collections:

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/ICESP
Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo - HC/ICESP


Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
art_GOMY_Predictive_models_for_mutations_in_mismatch_repair_genes_2012.PDFpublishedVersion (English)260.38 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.