Reoperative Transaxillary Subfascial Breast Augmentation and Fat Grafting: Technical Highlights and a Step-by-Step Video Guide

Imagem de Miniatura
Arquivos
art_MUNHOZ_Reoperative_Transaxillary_Subfascial_Breast_Augmentation_and_Fat_Grafting_2023.PDF (792.92 KB)
Citações na Scopus
0
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2023
DOI
Scopus
Web of Science
PubMed
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
Autores
MARQUES NETO, Ary de Azevedo
MAXIMILIANO, Joao
Citação
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, v.152, n.5, p.834E-839E, 2023
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Reoperative procedures after breast augmentation are frequently more complex than primary cases because of local complications and insufficient soft-tissue coverage. Although the transaxillary incision is often indicated in primary breast augmentation, limitations of this approach include secondary surgery and correcting complications after using this approach via the same incision. Combining the transaxillary technique with a subfascial pocket has been suggested to avoid breast scarring and the limitations of submuscular pockets represented by breast animation. With advances in autogenous fat grafting (AFG) techniques, implant coverage alternatives and more natural outcomes have been reported from more superficial implant pockets. Simultaneous AFG with silicone implants (defined as hybrid breast augmentation) has been evaluated recently as an attractive procedure. These two techniques combine to provide breast projection and natural cleavage while camouflaging implant edges. AFG is also important to reduce the intermammary distance and achieve a smoother transition between the breasts. The transaxillary approach can be useful in reoperative breast augmentation and avoids additional scarring on the breast. This article and the accompanying videos provide a detailed, step-by-step guide to reoperative hybrid breast augmentation using a subfascial transaxillary approach, with a predictable and optimized surgical outcome.
Palavras-chave
URI
https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/57634
Referências
  1. Auclair E, 2009, ANN CHIR PLAST ESTH, V54, P491, DOI 10.1016/j.anplas.2009.05.003
  2. Auclair E, 2015, CLIN PLAST SURG, V42, P307, DOI 10.1016/j.cps.2015.03.005
  3. Auclair E, 2013, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V132, P558, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31829ad2fa
  4. Aygit AC, 2013, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V131, P1149, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182865d68
  5. Basile FV, 2012, AESTHET PLAST SURG, V36, P323, DOI 10.1007/s00266-011-9810-0
  6. Bravo FG, 2015, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V135, P1010, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001052
  7. Coleman SR, 2007, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V119, P775, DOI 10.1097/01.prs.0000252001.59162.c9
  8. Condé-Green A, 2015, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V135, P1019, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001116
  9. Doloff JC, 2021, NAT BIOMED ENG, V5, P1115, DOI 10.1038/s41551-021-00739-4
  10. Giordano Philippe A, 2007, Aesthet Surg J, V27, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.asj.2006.12.012
  11. Graf RM, 2000, AESTHET PLAST SURG, V24, P216, DOI 10.1007/s002660010036
  12. Hidalgo DA, 2000, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V105, P2202, DOI 10.1097/00006534-200005000-00047
  13. HO LCY, 1993, BRIT J PLAST SURG, V46, P332, DOI 10.1016/0007-1226(93)90015-4
  14. Hoehler H, 1973, Br J Plast Surg, V26, P373, DOI 10.1016/0007-1226(73)90044-1
  15. Huang GJ, 2011, AESTHET SURG J, V31, P781, DOI 10.1177/1090820X11416936
  16. Kerfant N, 2017, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V139, p1080E, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003299
  17. Lista F, 2013, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V132, P1684, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a80880
  18. Serra-Mestre JM, 2017, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V140, p665E, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003788
  19. Maximiliano J, 2020, AESTHET SURG J, V40, pNP438, DOI 10.1093/asj/sjaa017
  20. Momeni A, 2006, J PLAST RECONSTR AES, V59, P1076, DOI 10.1016/j.bjps.2006.01.031
  21. Munhoz AM, 2006, AESTHET PLAST SURG, V30, P503, DOI 10.1007/s00266-006-0017-8
  22. Munhoz AM, 2023, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V152, p264E, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010216
  23. Munhoz AM, 2007, ANN PLAS SURG, V58, P141, DOI 10.1097/01.sap.0000237762.99536.77
  24. Munhoz AM, 2022, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V150, P782, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009605
  25. Munhoz AM, 2022, AESTHET PLAST SURG, V46, P1087, DOI 10.1007/s00266-021-02653-1
  26. Munhoz AM, 2021, AESTHET SURG J, V41, pNP1129, DOI 10.1093/asj/sjab068
  27. Munhoz AM, 2020, AESTHET SURG J, V40, P1179, DOI 10.1093/asj/sjz339
  28. Munhoz AM, 2019, PRS-GLOB OPEN, V7, DOI 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002466
  29. Munhoz AM, 2020, AESTHET SURG J, V40, pNP356, DOI 10.1093/asj/sjz334
  30. Munhoz AM, 2019, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V144, p143E, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005732
  31. Munhoz AM, 2017, CASE REP PLAST SURG, V4, P99, DOI 10.1080/23320885.2017.1407658
  32. Munhoz AM, 2015, CLIN PLAST SURG, V42, P565, DOI 10.1016/j.cps.2015.06.016
  33. Munhoz AM., 2021, Aesthet Surg J, V41, P364
  34. Nava MB., 2019, Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open, V7, pe2497
  35. Niechajev I, 2010, AESTHET PLAST SURG, V34, P322, DOI 10.1007/s00266-009-9437-6
  36. Pacella SJ, 2009, CLIN PLAST SURG, V36, P49, DOI 10.1016/j.cps.2008.07.006
  37. Park SH, 2018, ARCH PLAST SURG-APS, V45, P158, DOI 10.5999/aps.2017.01263
  38. de Arruda EGP, 2021, AESTHET SURG J, V41, pNP616, DOI 10.1093/asj/sjaa256
  39. Goes JCS, 2015, CLIN PLAST SURG, V42, P551, DOI 10.1016/j.cps.2015.06.017
  40. Sforza M, 2019, AESTHET SURG J, V39, pS95, DOI 10.1093/asj/sjz054
  41. Sim HB, 2014, ARCH PLAST SURG-APS, V41, P458, DOI 10.5999/aps.2014.41.5.458
  42. Smith JW., 1998, Plast Surg Forum, V21, P127
  43. Strock LL, 2010, AESTHET SURG J, V30, P745, DOI 10.1177/1090820X10381748
  44. TEBBETTS JB, 1984, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V74, P636, DOI 10.1097/00006534-198411000-00008
  45. WRIGHT JH, 1976, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V58, P429, DOI 10.1097/00006534-197610000-00006

Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/ICESP
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/04