Abnormal release of cardiac biomarkers in the presence of myocardial oedema evaluated by cardiac magnetic resonance after uncomplicated revascularization procedures

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
0
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2023
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
OXFORD UNIV PRESS
Citação
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, v.24, n.12, p.1700-1709, 2023
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Aims To analyse the association of myocardial oedema (ME), observed as high T2 signal intensity (HT2) in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, with the release of cardiac biomarkers, ventricular ejection, and clinical outcomes after revascularization. Methods and results Patients with stable coronary artery disease with the indication for revascularization were included. Biomarker levels [troponin I (cTnI) and creatine kinase MB (CK-MB)] and T2-weighted and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) images were obtained before and after the percutaneous or surgical revascularization procedures. The association of HT2 with the levels of biomarkers, with and without LGE, evolution of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and 5-year clinical outcomes were assessed. A total of 196 patients were divided into 2 groups: Group 1 (HT2, 40) and Group 2 (no HT2, 156). Both peak cTnI (8.9 and 1.6 ng/mL) and peak CK-MB values (44.7 and 12.1 ng/mL) were significantly higher in Group 1. Based on the presence of new LGE, patients were stratified into Groups A (no HT2/LGE, 149), B (HT2, 9), C (LGE, 7), and D (both HT2/LGE, 31). The peak cTnI and CK-MB values were 1.5 and 12.0, 5.4 and 44.7, 5.0 and 18.3, and 9.8 and 42.8 ng/mL in Groups A, B, C, and D, respectively, and were significantly different. The average LVEF decreased by 4.4% in Group 1 and increased by 2.2% in Group 2 (P = 0.057). Conclusion ME after revascularization procedures was associated with increased release of cardiac necrosis biomarkers, and a trend towards a difference in LVEF, indicating a role of ME in cardiac injury after interventions.
Palavras-chave
myocardial oedema, high T2 signal intensity, cardiac MRI, revascularization, biomarkers, periprocedural injury
Referências
  1. Abdel-Aty H, 2009, JACC-CARDIOVASC IMAG, V2, P832, DOI 10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.04.007
  2. Bijnens B, 2008, HEART, V94, P1117, DOI 10.1136/hrt.2007.135392
  3. Eitel I, 2011, J CARDIOVASC MAGN R, V13, DOI 10.1186/1532-429X-13-13
  4. Fernández-Jiménez R, 2015, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V65, P315, DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.11.004
  5. Friedrich MG, 2010, NAT REV CARDIOL, V7, P292, DOI 10.1038/nrcardio.2010.28
  6. GARCIADORADO D, 1993, CARDIOVASC RES, V27, P1462, DOI 10.1093/cvr/27.8.1462
  7. Herrmann J, 2005, EUR HEART J, V26, P2493, DOI 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi455
  8. Hirleman E, 2008, PERFUSION-UK, V23, P311, DOI 10.1177/0267659109105079
  9. Hueb W, 2016, ANN THORAC SURG, V101, P2202, DOI 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.11.034
  10. Levy JH, 2003, ANN THORAC SURG, V75, pS715, DOI 10.1016/S0003-4975(02)04701-X
  11. McAlindon E, 2015, EUR HEART J-CARD IMG, V16, P738, DOI 10.1093/ehjci/jev001
  12. Patel Manesh R, 2012, J Am Coll Cardiol, V59, P857, DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.12.001
  13. Rahimi K, 2009, HEART, V95, P1937, DOI 10.1136/hrt.2009.173302
  14. Raman SV, 2010, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V55, P2480, DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.01.047
  15. TSCHOLAKOFF D, 1986, RADIOLOGY, V159, P667, DOI 10.1148/radiology.159.3.3704148
  16. White HD, 2011, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V57, P2406, DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.01.029