Histopathological evaluation and risk factors related to the development of pouchitis in patients with ileal pouches for ulcerative colitis

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
5
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2012
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
HOSPITAL CLINICAS, UNIV SAO PAULO
Citação
CLINICS, v.67, n.7, p.705-710, 2012
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
OBJECTIVE: Many changes in mucosal morphology are observed following ileal pouch construction, including colonic metaplasia and dysplasia. Additionally, one rare but potential complication is the development of adenocarcinoma of the reservoir. The aim of this study was to evaluate the most frequently observed histopathological changes in ileal pouches and to correlate these changes with potential risk factors for complications. METHODS: A total of 41 patients were enrolled in the study and divided into the following three groups: a non-pouchitis group (group 1) (n = 20; 8 males; mean age: 47.5 years) demonstrating optimal outcome; a pouchitis without antibiotics group (group 2) (n = 14; 4 males; mean age: 47 years), containing individuals with pouchitis who did not receive treatment with antibiotics; and a pouchitis plus antibiotics group (group 3) (n = 7; 3 males; mean age: 41 years), containing those patients with pouchitis who were administered antibiotics. Ileal pouch endoscopy was performed, and tissue biopsy samples were collected for histopathological analysis. RESULTS: Colonic metaplasia was found in 15 (36.6%) of the 41 patients evaluated; of these, five (25%) were from group 1, eight (57.1%) were from group 2, and two (28.6%) were from group 3. However, no correlation was established between the presence of metaplasia and pouchitis (p = 0.17). and no differences in mucosal atrophy or the degree of chronic or acute inflammation were observed between groups 1, 2, and 3 (p > 0.45). Moreover, no dysplasia or neoplastic changes were detected. However, the degree of mucosal atrophy correlated well with the time of postoperative follow-up (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The degree of mucosal atrophy, the presence of colonic metaplasia, and the degree of acute or chronic inflammation do not appear to constitute risk factors for the development of pouchitis. Moreover, we observed that longer postoperative follow-up times were associated with greater degrees of mucosal atrophy.
Palavras-chave
Colonic metaplasia, Atrophy, Ileal Pouch, Pouchitis, Proctocolectomy
Referências
  1. Aisenberg J, 2004, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V99, P432, DOI 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.04107.x
  2. APEL R, 1994, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V107, P435
  3. BROOKE BN, 1956, LANCET, V271, P532
  4. DESILVA HJ, 1991, GUT, V32, P61, DOI 10.1136/gut.32.1.61
  5. DOZOIS RR, 1989, ANN SURG, V210, P268, DOI 10.1097/00000658-198909000-00002
  6. Ettorre GM, 2000, DIS COLON RECTUM, V43, P1743, DOI 10.1007/BF02236861
  7. FAZIO VW, 1995, ANN SURG, V222, P120, DOI 10.1097/00000658-199508000-00003
  8. FONKALSRUD EW, 1978, ANN SURG, V188, P245, DOI 10.1097/00000658-197808000-00019
  9. Fruin AB, 2003, J GASTROINTEST SURG, V7, P246, DOI 10.1016/S1091-255X(02)00191-9
  10. Gullberg K, 1997, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V112, P1487, DOI 10.1016/S0016-5085(97)70029-5
  11. Gullberg K, 2002, INT J COLORECTAL DIS, V17, P92, DOI 10.1007/s00384-001-0364-5
  12. Habr-Gama A, 1997, DOENCA INFLAMATORIA, VIII
  13. Hassan C, 2003, INT J COLORECTAL DIS, V18, P276, DOI 10.1007/s00384-002-0452-1
  14. Hata K, 2003, SCAND J GASTROENTERO, V38, P1055, DOI 10.1080/00365520310005938
  15. Herline AJ, 2003, DIS COLON RECTUM, V46, P156, DOI 10.1097/01.DCR.0000049346.48395.4D
  16. Heuschen UA, 2001, INT J COLORECTAL DIS, V16, P126, DOI 10.1007/s003840000276
  17. Hulten L, 2002, DIS COLON RECTUM, V45, P448, DOI 10.1007/S10350-004-6218-9
  18. Hurst RD, 1996, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V131, P497
  19. Kariv R, 2010, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V139, P806, DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.05.085
  20. KMIOT WA, 1993, BRIT J SURG, V80, P1445, DOI 10.1002/bjs.1800801132
  21. Knupper N, 2006, INT J COLORECTAL DIS, V21, P478, DOI 10.1007/s00384-005-0063-8
  22. Kuisma J, 2003, DIS COLON RECTUM, V46, P1476, DOI 10.1097/01/DCR.0000093821.07912.96
  23. LOHMULLER JL, 1990, ANN SURG, V211, P622
  24. M'Koma AE, 2011, INT J COLORECTAL DIS, V26, P533, DOI 10.1007/s00384-011-1137-4
  25. NICHOLLS RJ, 1987, BRIT J SURG, V74, P564, DOI 10.1002/bjs.1800740705
  26. Nilubol N, 2007, DIS COLON RECTUM, V50, P825, DOI 10.1007/s10350-007-0217-6
  27. Pardi DS, 2006, ALIMENT PHARM THERAP, V23, P1087, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.02884.x
  28. PARKS AG, 1978, BRIT MED J, V2, P85
  29. RAUH SM, 1991, DIS COLON RECTUM, V34, P685, DOI 10.1007/BF02050351
  30. SANDBORN WJ, 1994, MAYO CLIN PROC, V69, P409
  31. SANDBORN WJ, 1995, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V90, P740
  32. Shen B, 2001, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V121, P261, DOI 10.1053/gast.2001.26290
  33. Shen B, 2005, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V100, P93, DOI 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.40778.x
  34. Simchuk EJ, 2000, WORLD J SURG, V24, P851
  35. Stahlberg D, 1996, DIS COLON RECTUM, V39, P1012, DOI 10.1007/BF02054692
  36. Stallmach A, 1999, DIS COLON RECTUM, V42, P1311, DOI 10.1007/BF02234221
  37. Stein R B, 2000, Semin Gastrointest Dis, V11, P2
  38. SVANINGER G, 1993, SCAND J GASTROENTERO, V28, P695, DOI 10.3109/00365529309098275
  39. Teixeira Magaly Gemio, 2003, Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo, V58, P193
  40. Teixeira W G, 1999, Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo, V54, P155
  41. Thompson-Fawcett MW, 2001, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V121, P275, DOI 10.1053/gast.2001.26442
  42. Trovato C, 2009, DIGEST LIVER DIS, V41, P578, DOI 10.1016/j.dld.2008.09.019
  43. UTSUNOMIYA J, 1980, DIS COLON RECTUM, V23, P459, DOI 10.1007/BF02987076