Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Brazilian version of the Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ)

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
8
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2014
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
SPRINGER LONDON LTD
Citação
CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, v.33, n.5, p.699-706, 2014
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
The Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) is a feasible multisystem specific tool that has been extensively used as an additional assessment for systemic sclerosis (SSc). The aim of this study is to cross-culturally adapt and validate the Brazilian version of the SHAQ. Construct validity was assessed based on the correlations between SHAQ and both the Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form 36 version 2 (SF-36v2 (TM)) and the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI). The correlation between the SHAQ and disease severity was assessed by Spearman's correlation coefficient. The reproducibility of the SHAQ was evaluated by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Among the 151 consecutive outpatients evaluated, 59 % had limited SSc subtype. The overall disease severity visual analog scale (VAS) of the SHAQ was statistically significantly correlated to HAQ-DI, pain VAS, and the SF-36v2 (TM) physical component summary score (r = 0.595, r = 0.612, and r = -0.582, respectively; p < 0.001). Further analysis of all SF-36v2 (TM) components revealed statistically significant correlations between overall disease severity VAS and bodily pain (r = -0.621, p < 0.001), vitality (r = -0.544, p < 0.001), physical function (r = -0.510, p < 0.001), and role limitation-physical dimensions (r = -0.505, p < 0.001). Moreover, digestive, pulmonary, and overall disease severity VASs were statistically significantly correlated to the number of organs involved (r = 0.178, p = 0.029; r = 0.214, p = 0.008; r = 0.282, p < 0.001). We also demonstrated high reproducibility for SHAQ (ICC = 0.757, 95 % confidence interval = 0.636-0.842). The Brazilian version of the SHAQ demonstrated both construct and discriminant validities as well as good reproducibility.
Palavras-chave
Health Assessment Questionnaire, Quality of life, SF-36, Systemic sclerosis
Referências
  1. CHACKO KA, 1995, CIRCULATION, V92, P2003
  2. Charles C, 2006, LANCET, V367, P1683, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68737-0
  3. Ciconelli R.M., 1999, REV BRAS REUMATOL, V39, P143
  4. Clements PJ, 2001, ARTHRITIS RHEUM, V44, P653, DOI 10.1002/1529-0131(200103)44:3<653::AID-ANR114>3.0.CO;2-Q
  5. Clements Philip J., 1995, Current Opinion in Rheumatology, V7, P517
  6. Cohen J, 2003, APPL MULTIPLE REGRES, P703
  7. Danieli E, 2005, CLIN RHEUMATOL, V24, P48, DOI 10.1007/s10067-004-0970-z
  8. FERRAZ MB, 1990, J RHEUMATOL, V17, P813
  9. FRIES JF, 1980, ARTHRITIS RHEUM, V23, P137, DOI 10.1002/art.1780230202
  10. FRIES JF, 1982, J RHEUMATOL, V9, P789
  11. Georges C, 2005, CLIN RHEUMATOL, V24, P3, DOI 10.1007/s10067-004-0942-3
  12. Hudson M, 2009, J RHEUMATOL, V36, P1226, DOI 10.3899/jrheum.081057
  13. Hudson M, 2009, ARTHRIT RHEUM-ARTHR, V61, P1112, DOI 10.1002/art.24676
  14. Johnson SR, 2005, ARTHRIT RHEUM-ARTHR, V53, P256, DOI 10.1002/art.21084
  15. Khanna D, 2005, J RHEUMATOL, V32, P832
  16. Khanna D, 2007, ARTHRITIS RHEUM, V56, P1676, DOI 10.1002/art.22580
  17. Kuwana M, 2003, J RHEUMATOL, V30, P1253
  18. La Montagna G, 2006, Reumatismo, V58, P112
  19. Laguardia J, 2011, HEALTH QUAL LIFE OUT, V9, DOI 10.1186/1477-7525-9-61
  20. LEROY EC, 1988, J RHEUMATOL, V15, P202
  21. Ostojic P, 2006, Z RHEUMATOL, V65, P168, DOI 10.1007/s00393-006-0050-7
  22. Pope J, 2011, ARTHRIT CARE RES, V63, pS98, DOI 10.1002/acr.20598
  23. Ramos-Casals M, 2010, NAT REV RHEUMATOL, V6, P269, DOI 10.1038/nrrheum.2010.48
  24. Rannou F, 2007, ARTHRIT RHEUM-ARTHR, V57, P94, DOI 10.1002/art.22468
  25. Ruof J, 1999, RHEUMATOLOGY, V38, P535, DOI 10.1093/rheumatology/38.6.535
  26. Silman A, 1998, J RHEUMATOL, V25, P79
  27. Smyth AE, 2003, RHEUMATOLOGY, V42, P732, DOI 10.1093/rheumatology/keg145
  28. Poole J L, 1991, Arthritis Care Res, V4, P27, DOI 10.1002/art.1790040106
  29. Steen VD, 1997, ARTHRITIS RHEUM, V40, P1984, DOI 10.1002/art.1780401110
  30. Tektonidou MG, 2011, NAT REV RHEUMATOL, V7, P708, DOI 10.1038/nrrheum.2011.157
  31. Terwee CB, 2007, J CLIN EPIDEMIOL, V60, P34, DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012
  32. Ware J. E., 2000, SF 36 HLTH SURVEY MA
  33. WARE JE, 1995, MED CARE, V33, pAS264
  34. Wild D, 2005, VALUE HEALTH, V8, P94, DOI 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x