Neuroprotective effect of epidural hypothermia after spinal cord lesion in rats

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
5
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2014
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
HOSPITAL CLINICAS, UNIV SAO PAULO
Citação
CLINICS, v.69, n.8, p.559-564, 2014
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
OBJECTIVES : To evaluate the neuroprotective effect of epidural hypothermia in rats subjected to experimental spinal cord lesion. METHODS: Wistar rats (n = 30) weighing 320-360 g were randomized to two groups (hypothermia and control) of 15 rats per group. A spinal cord lesion was induced by the standardized drop of a 10-g weight from a height of 2.5 cm, using the New York University Impactor, after laminectomy at the T9-10 level. Rats in the hypothermia group underwent epidural hypothermia for 20 minutes immediately after spinal cord injury. Motor function was assessed for six weeks using the Basso, Beattie and Bresnahan motor scores and the inclined plane test. At the end of the final week, the rats' neurological status was monitored by the motor evoked potential test and the results for the two groups were compared. RESULTS: Analysis of the Basso, Beattie and Bresnahan scores obtained during the six-week period indicated that there were no significant differences between the two groups. There was no significant difference between the groups in the inclined plane test scores during the six-week period. Furthermore, at the end of the study, the latency and amplitude values of the motor evoked potential test were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Hypothermia did not produce a neuroprotective effect when applied at the injury level and in the epidural space immediately after induction of a spinal cord contusion in Wistar rats.
Palavras-chave
Spinal Cord Injuries, Hypothermia, Neuroprotective Agents, Rats, Wistar
Referências
  1. ALBIN MS, 1967, ANESTH ANAL CURR RES, V46, P8
  2. Arrica Mauro, 2007, Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, V11, P6, DOI 10.1177/1089253206297409
  3. BASSO DM, 1995, J NEUROTRAUM, V12, P1, DOI 10.1089/neu.1995.12.1
  4. Bernard SA, 2003, CRIT CARE MED, V31, P2041, DOI 10.1097/01.CCM.0000069731.18472.61
  5. Brasil. Ministerio da Saude, PROC HOSP SUS LOC IN
  6. BUSTO R, 1987, J CEREBR BLOOD F MET, V7, P729
  7. Casas CE, 2005, J NEUROSURG-SPINE, V2, P308, DOI 10.3171/spi.2005.2.3.0308
  8. Chatzipanteli K, 2000, J NEUROTRAUM, V17, P321, DOI 10.1089/neu.2000.17.321
  9. Crock HV, 2005, EUR SPINE J, V14, P910, DOI 10.1007/s00586-005-0924-4
  10. Dimar JR, 2000, SPINE, V25, P2294, DOI 10.1097/00007632-200009150-00006
  11. GALE K, 1985, EXP NEUROL, V88, P123, DOI 10.1016/0014-4886(85)90118-9
  12. Ha KY, 2008, SPINE, V33, P2059, DOI 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818018f6
  13. Inamasu J, 2002, ANN EMERG MED, V40, P220, DOI 10.1067/mem.2002.123697
  14. Maybhate A, 2012, CRIT CARE MED, V40, P573, DOI 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318232d97e
  15. National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center, 2010, 2010 ANN STAT REP SP
  16. Ok JH, 2012, SPINE, V37, pE1551, DOI 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31826ff7f1
  17. Schiaveto-de-Souza A, 2013, BRAZ J MED BIOL RES, V46, P348, DOI 10.1590/1414-431X20132322
  18. Souza FI, 2013, ACTA ORTOP BRAS, V21, P87
  19. Yu CG, 2000, J NEUROSURG, V93, P85, DOI 10.3171/spi.2000.93.1.0085