A comparative radiographic investigation of femoroacetabular impingement in young patients with and without hip pain

Imagem de Miniatura
Arquivos
art_MIGUEL_A_comparative_radiographic_investigation_of_femoroacetabular_impingement_in_2012.PDF (212.81 KB)
Citações na Scopus
7
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2012
DOI
SciELO
Scopus
Web of Science
PubMed
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
HOSPITAL CLINICAS, UNIV SAO PAULO
Autores
Citação
CLINICS, v.67, n.5, p.463-467, 2012
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
OBJECTIVE: To compare the existence of radiographic abnormalities in two groups of patients, those with and without hip pain. METHODS: A total 222 patients were evaluated between March 2007 and April 2009; 122 complained of groin pain, and 100 had no symptoms. The individuals in both groups underwent radiographic examinations of the hip using the following views: anteroposterior, Lequesne false profile, Dunn, Dunn 45 degrees, and Ducroquet. RESULTS: A total of 1110 radiographs were evaluated. Female patients were prevalent in both groups (52% symptomatic, 58% asymptomatic). There were statistically significant differences between the groups in age (p < 0.0001), weight (p = 0.002) and BMI (p = 0.006). The positive findings in the group with groin pain consisted of the presence of a bump on the femoral head in the anteroposterior view (p < 0.0001) or in the Dunn 45 degrees view (p = 0.008). The difference in the alpha angle in the anteroposterior, Dunn, Dunn 45 degrees, and Ducroquet views for all of the cases studied was p, 0.0001. The joint space measurement differed significantly between groups in the Lequesne view (p = 0.007). The Lequesne anteversion angle (rho) and the femoral offset measurement also differed significantly (p = 0.005 and p = 0.0001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the best views for diagnosing a femoroacetabular impingement are the anteroposterior pelvic orthostatic, the Dunn 45 degrees, and the Ducroquet views. The following findings correlated with hip pain: a decrease in the femoral offset, an increase in the a angle, an increase in the Lequesne r angle, a decrease in the CE angle of Wiberg, a thinner articular space and the presence of a bump on the femoral head-neck transition.
Palavras-chave
Radiography, Articular Pain, Hip Joint, Femoral Head, Femoroacetabular Impingement
URI
https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/856
Referências
  1. Beall DP, 2005, SKELETAL RADIOL, V34, P691, DOI 10.1007/s00256-005-0932-9
  2. Beck M, 2005, J BONE JOINT SURG BR, V87B, P1012, DOI 10.1302/0301-620X.87B7.15203
  3. Blankenbaker DG, 2006, SKELETAL RADIOL, V35, P352, DOI 10.1007/s00256-006-0105-5
  4. Brown CR, 2007, ADULT HIP, P572
  5. Clohisy JC, 2009, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V467, P638, DOI 10.1007/s11999-008-0680-y
  6. COOPERMAN DR, 1983, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P79
  7. Correia AM, 2007, THESIS U SAO PAULO S
  8. Crestani MV, 2006, REV BRAS ORTOP, V41, P285
  9. Delaunay S, 1997, SKELETAL RADIOL, V26, P75
  10. Dudda M, 2009, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V467, P651, DOI 10.1007/s11999-008-0617-5
  11. Eijer H, 2001, J ORTHOP TRAUMA, V15, P475, DOI 10.1097/00005131-200109000-00003
  12. Ganz R, 2003, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P112, DOI 10.1097/01.blo.0000096804.78689.c2
  13. Goodman DA, 1997, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V79A, P1489
  14. Graves ML, 2009, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V467, P717, DOI 10.1007/s11999-008-0648-y
  15. HARRIS WH, 1986, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P20
  16. KELLGREN JH, 1957, ANN RHEUM DIS, V16, P494, DOI 10.1136/ard.16.4.494
  17. KLAUE K, 1991, J BONE JOINT SURG BR, V73, P423
  18. Labronici JP, 2009, REV BRAS ORTOP, V44, P120
  19. Lequesne M, 2004, ANN RHEUM DIS, V63, P1145, DOI 10.1136/ard.2003.018424
  20. Leunig M, 2009, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V467, P616, DOI 10.1007/s11999-008-0646-0
  21. LLOYDROBERTS GC, 1955, J BONE JOINT SURG BR, V37, P8
  22. Meyer DC, 2006, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P181, DOI 10.1097/01.blo.0000201168.72388.24
  23. MURRAY RO, 1965, BRIT J RADIOL, V38, P810
  24. Notzli HP, 2002, J BONE JOINT SURG BR, V84B, P556, DOI 10.1302/0301-620X.84B4.12014
  25. Peelle MW, 2005, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P327, DOI 10.1097/01.blo.0000181147.86058.74
  26. Peixoto SV, 2004, EPIDEMIOL SERV SAUDE, V13, P239
  27. Rackhra KS, 2009, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P660
  28. Reynolds D, 1999, J BONE JOINT SURG BR, V81B, P281, DOI 10.1302/0301-620X.81B2.8291
  29. Siebenrock KA, 2003, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V85A, P278
  30. SOLOMON L, 1976, J BONE JOINT SURG BR, V58, P176
  31. Tannast M, 2008, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V466, P273, DOI 10.1007/s11999-007-0061-y
  32. Tannast M, 2007, AM J ROENTGENOL, V188, P1540, DOI 10.2214/AJR.06.0921
  33. Tonnis D, 1999, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V81A, P1747
  34. Wenger DE, 2004, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P145, DOI 10.1097/01.blo.0000136903.01368.20

Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MOT
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/IOT
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/41