Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/8897
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSistema FMUSP-HC: Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP) e Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP-
dc.contributor.authorWOLOSZYNEK, Renata Reis-
dc.contributor.authorBRITO, Luciana Pinto-
dc.contributor.authorBATISTA, Marcelo Cidade-
dc.contributor.authorVALASSI, Helena Panteliou Lima-
dc.contributor.authorMENDONCA, Berenice Bilharinho-
dc.contributor.authorBRITO, Vinicius Nahime-
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-22T22:06:21Z-
dc.date.available2015-04-22T22:06:21Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationANNALS OF CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, v.52, n.1, p.67-75, 2015-
dc.identifier.issn0004-5632-
dc.identifier.urihttps://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/8897-
dc.description.abstractBackground Anti-Mullerian hormone is marker of ovarian and testicular reserve. The clinical use of this hormone requires proper standardization of reference intervals. The aims of this study were to validate the Anti-Mullerian hormone Gen II immunoassay, to establish Anti-Mullerian hormone reference intervals in healthy subjects, and to evaluate the influence of hormonal contraceptives, smoking, and body mass index on Anti-Mullerian hormone. Methods The validation of the Anti-Mullerian hormone Gen II assay (Beckman Coulter Company, TX, USA) was performed using a simplified protocol recommended by Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute. One-hundred and thirty-three healthy females and 120 males were prospectively selected for this study. Results The analytical and functional sensitivities of the Anti-Mullerian hormone Gen II immunoassay were 0.02 and 0.2ng/mL, respectively. Intra-assay coefficients ranged from 5.2 to 9.0%, whereas inter-assay precision ranged from 4.6 to 7.8% at different concentrations. In females, Anti-Mullerian hormone showed progressive decline with increasing age (r=-0.4, p<0.001), whereas in males, age showed no influence on Anti-Mullerian hormone concentrations. In females, Anti-Mullerian hormone concentrations did not differ between users and non-users of hormonal contraceptives, smokers, and non-smokers and obese and lean individuals. However, there was a negative and significant correlation between Anti-Mullerian hormone and body mass index in males (r=-0.3, p=0.008). Conclusions Anti-Mullerian hormone Gen II assay was reliable for determining serum Anti-Mullerian hormone concentrations. Anti-Mullerian hormone concentrations declined with aging and presented a wide inter-individual variability. The lack of influence of hormonal contraceptives, smoking, and obesity on Anti-Mullerian hormone in both sexes allowed us to refine the normative concentrations for the Brazilian population.-
dc.description.sponsorshipFundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [2011/2129070, 2012/205258]-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherSAGE PUBLICATIONS INC-
dc.relation.ispartofAnnals of Clinical Biochemistry-
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess-
dc.subjectClinical studies-
dc.subjectendocrinology-
dc.subjectimmunoassay-
dc.subject.otherreproductive-age women-
dc.subject.otherovarian reserve-
dc.subject.otherantimullerian hormone-
dc.subject.otherprospective cohort-
dc.subject.otheramh-
dc.subject.otherobesity-
dc.subject.othermarker-
dc.subject.otherassay-
dc.subject.otherhypogonadism-
dc.subject.otherpopulation-
dc.titleValidation of an immunoassay for anti-Mullerian hormone measurements and reference intervals in healthy Brazilian subjects-
dc.typearticle-
dc.rights.holderCopyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0004563214554462-
dc.identifier.pmid25249661-
dc.subject.wosMedical Laboratory Technology-
dc.type.categoryoriginal article-
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion-
hcfmusp.description.beginpage67-
hcfmusp.description.endpage75-
hcfmusp.description.issue1-
hcfmusp.description.volume52-
hcfmusp.origemWOS-
hcfmusp.origem.id2-s2.0-84918817388-
hcfmusp.origem.idWOS:000346418300008-
hcfmusp.publisher.cityTHOUSAND OAKS-
hcfmusp.publisher.countryUSA-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceAksglaede L, 2010, J CLIN ENDOCR METAB, V95, P5357, DOI 10.1210/jc.2010-1207-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceAl-Qahtani A, 2005, CLIN ENDOCRINOL, V63, P267, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2005.02336.x-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBentzen JG, 2012, REPROD BIOMED ONLINE, V25, P612, DOI 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.09.001-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBroekmans FJ, 2008, TRENDS ENDOCRIN MET, V19, P340, DOI 10.1016/j.tem.2008.08.002-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBrougham MFH, 2012, J CLIN ENDOCR METAB, V97, P2059, DOI 10.1210/jc.2011-3180-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceCelik HG, 2012, FERTIL STERIL, V97, P1472, DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.03.027-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceCoutant R, 2010, J CLIN ENDOCR METAB, V95, P5225, DOI 10.1210/jc.2010-1535-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceDewailly D, 2014, HUM REPROD UPDATE, V20, P370, DOI 10.1093/humupd/dmt062-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceFreeman EW, 2007, FERTIL STERIL, V87, P101, DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.05.074-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceFreeman EW, 2012, J CLIN ENDOCR METAB, V97, P1673, DOI 10.1210/jc.2011-3032-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGrinspon RP, 2010, HORM RES PAEDIAT, V73, P81, DOI 10.1159/000277140-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGrinspon RP, 2011, INT J ANDROL, V34, pE487, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2011.01210.x-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHagen CP, 2012, FERTIL STERIL, V98, P1602, DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.08.008-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHagen CP, 2010, J CLIN ENDOCR METAB, V95, P5003, DOI 10.1210/jc.2010-0930-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHalawaty Samir, 2010, J Obstet Gynaecol Can, V32, P687-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHansen KR, 2011, FERTIL STERIL, V95, P170, DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.04.006-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHomburg R, 2013, HUM REPROD, V28, P1077, DOI 10.1093/humrep/det015-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceJosso N, 2013, INT J ENDOCRINOL, DOI 10.1155/2013/674105-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceKalaiselvi V S, 2012, J Clin Diagn Res, V6, P1636, DOI 10.7860/JCDR/2012/5101.2624-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceKallio S, 2012, FERTIL STERIL-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceKuiri-Hanninen T, 2011, J CLIN ENDOCR METAB, V96, P3432, DOI 10.1210/jc.2011-1502-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceKumar A, 2010, J IMMUNOL METHODS, V362, P51, DOI 10.1016/j.jim.2010.08.011-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceLa Marca A, 2012, EUR J OBSTET GYN R B, V163, P180, DOI 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.04.013-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceLa Marca A, 2010, HUM REPROD UPDATE, V16, P113, DOI 10.1093/humupd/dmp036-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceLi HWR, 2011, CONTRACEPTION, V83, P582, DOI 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.09.007-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceLi HWR, 2012, J ASSIST REPROD GEN, V29, P1443, DOI 10.1007/s10815-012-9880-1-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceLie Fong S, 2012, J Clin Endocrinol Metab, V97, P4650, DOI 10.1210/jc.2012-1440-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceNCCLS, 2005, EP15A2 NCCLS-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceNCCLS, 2004, EP17A NCCLS-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceNCCLS, 2003, EP6A NCCLS-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceNelson SM, 2011, REPROD BIOMED ONLINE, V23, P411, DOI 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.06.011-
hcfmusp.relation.referencePietilainen KH, 2012, J CLIN ENDOCR METAB, V97, pE161, DOI 10.1210/jc.2011-1697-
hcfmusp.relation.referencePlante Beth J, 2010, Menopause, V17, P571, DOI 10.1097/gme.0b013e3181c7deba-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceRey Rodolfo, 2005, Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol, V49, P26, DOI 10.1590/S0004-27302005000100005-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceRustamov O, 2012, HUM REPROD, V27, P3085, DOI 10.1093/humrep/des260-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSahmay S, 2012, ARCH GYNECOL OBSTET, V286, P661, DOI 10.1007/s00404-012-2363-x-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSowers MR, 2010, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V1204, P95, DOI 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05523.x-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSteiner AZ, 2010, CONTRACEPTION, V81, P245, DOI 10.1016/j.contraception.2009.10.004-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSu HI, 2008, MENOPAUSE, V15, P857, DOI [10.1097/gme.0b013e318165981e, 10.1097/gme.0b01e318165981e]-
hcfmusp.relation.referencevan Rooij IAJ, 2005, FERTIL STERIL, V83, P979, DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.11.029-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceWallace AM, 2011, ANN CLIN BIOCHEM, V48, P370, DOI 10.1258/acb.2011.010172-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceWaylen AL, 2010, REPROD BIOMED ONLINE, V20, P861, DOI 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.02.021-
dc.description.indexMEDLINE-
dc.identifier.eissn1758-1001-
hcfmusp.citation.scopus8-
hcfmusp.scopus.lastupdate2024-03-29-
Appears in Collections:

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MCM
Departamento de Clínica Médica - FM/MCM

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/ICHC
Instituto Central - HC/ICHC

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/42
LIM/42 - Laboratório de Hormônios e Genética Molecular

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - ODS/03
ODS/03 - Saúde e bem-estar


Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
art_WOLOSZYNEK_Validation_of_an_immunoassay_for_antiMullerian_hormone_measurements_2015.PDF
  Restricted Access
publishedVersion (English)232.67 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.