CHRISTIANO MAKOTO SAKAI

(Fonte: Lattes)
Índice h a partir de 2011
6
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Instituto Central, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Médico

Resultados de Busca

Agora exibindo 1 - 10 de 20
  • article 2 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Endoscopic Management of Anchor Erosion Adjacent to the Pylorus Following Duodenal-Jejunal Bypass Sleeve
    (2019) MOURA, Eduardo Guimaraes Hourneaux De; MOURA, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de; GALVAO-NETO, Manoel; SAKAI, Christiano Makoto; SILVA, Gustavo Luis Rodela; BAZARBASHI, Ahmad Najdat; THOMPSON, Christopher C.
    Introduction Obesity is a pandemic associated with significant comorbidities such as type 2 diabetes (T2DM). RYGB is an effective treatment modality for obesity and T2DM. However, bariatric surgery is currently limited to a relatively small population of patients. The duodenal-jejunal bypass sleeve (DJBS) has recently emerged as a promising therapy for obesity and T2DM by providing similar physiological effects to RYGB. We describe a case of a patient with a previously placed DJBS presenting with abdominal pain from anchor erosion managed with an endoscopic approach. Methods A 58-year-old man with obesity and T2DM who had failed prior medical therapy for obesity was referred for DJBS placement. This was placed without complications. At 8 weeks follow-up, he developed abdominal pain and vomiting prompting immediate endoscopic evaluation. Results EGD revealed an anchor erosion resulting in mild stenosis of the pylorus. Additionally, hyperplastic tissue was found to be adhered to the device in the duodenal bulb. Endoscopic removal with balloon dilation was unsuccessful, and a stent was placed in a ""stent-in-stent"" fashion through the sleeve to compress the area of tissue ingrowth encouraging local tissue necrosis and device extraction. At 15 days follow-up, the stent was removed; however, the DJBS remained adhered and immobile. Next, the ingrowing hyperplastic tissue was resected in a piecemeal fashion. This resulted in mobilization of the sleeve anchors in the duodenal bulb and successful removal of the DJBS. Conclusions DJBS endoscopic removal is safe and effective even in challenging cases, thus preventing the need for surgical intervention.
  • article
    An innovative laparoscopic and endoscopic technique in an animal model: combined gastric full-thickness tumor resection
    (2019) MORITA, Flavio Hiroshi Ananias; SAKAI, Christiano Makoto; KAWAMOTO, Flavio Masato; MOURA, Eduardo Guimaraes Hourneaux de; SAKAI, Paulo
    Background and study aims The combination of endoscopy with laparoscopy for full-thickness gastric resection has received much attention. The advantage in using it is removak of the target lesion without resection of excessive normal tissue. The technique could prevent deformed scars, particularly at the cardia and in the prepyloric arca. The aim of this protocol was to evaluate a new combined operation for full-thickness resection of the gastric wall. Materials and methods Gastric subepithelial lesions in multiple topographic locations of the stomach were simulated in seven live pigs. Full-thickness gastric resection was undertaken and after assessment of the outcome, the animals were euthanized. The primary endpoint was accomplishment of the procedure following all steps in the new technique, in various gastric locations. The secondary endpoints were duration of the procedure, quality of specimen margins, and complications. Results Resections were successful, complete, and complication-free, ensuring a safe surgical margin of healthy tissue. The procedure was completed in 50 minutes. No mucosal perforation or gas escape occurred. Conclusions The combined technique was safe, effective and minimally invasive. No expensive materials were used. Lesion exposure, gastric content leakage, incomplete resection, and excessive normal tissue elimination were avoided. Human trials of this technique may be warranted.
  • article 0 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    ENDOSCOPIC GASTRIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION: experimental comparative protocol between standard technique and Hybrid-Knife(r)
    (2016) MENDONÇA, Ernesto Quaresma; ZURETTI, Lucas Snioka; PANZANI, Thiago; SULBARAN, Marianny; SAKAI, Christiano Makoto; SAKAI, Paulo
    ABSTRACT Background Endoscopic treatment of superficial gastrointestinal tumors is routinely performed, however the advantages and shortcomings of submucosal pressure-jet dissection is still debated. Objective - Aiming to compare this technique with conventional submucosal dissection, a study was designed in pigs. Methods - Areas of the antral mucosa of the stomach with a diameter of 2 cm2 (6 per animal) were marked, and resected by means of the hybrid-knife (experimental technique), and Flush-knife or IT-knife (controls). An ERBE ICC 300 electrosurgical unit was adopted. End-points were procedural time, complications, and quality of the resected specimen. Results - A total of 27 interventions were conducted in five animals. Time spent with the two options was quite short, and similar: 9.5±3.1 vs 8.0±3.0 minutes (P=0.21). Complications didn't differ (three per group, not significant), and removed specimen looked adequate in both circumstances. Conclusion - The hybrid-knife technique is an acceptable alternative to submucosal dissection, showing no difference compared to the standard technique taking into consideration the procedure, the presence of complications and the quality of the resected specimen.
  • article 7 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Systematic review and meta-analysis of colon capsule endoscopy accuracy for colorectal cancer screening. An alternative during the Covid-19 pandemic?
    (2022) SULBARAN, Marianny; BUSTAMANTE-LOPEZ, Leonardo; BERNARDO, Wanderley; SAKAI, Christiano M.; SAKAI, Paulo; NAHAS, Sergio; MOURA, Eduardo G. H. de
    Aim To determine the diagnostic accuracy of colon capsule endoscopy for colorectal cancer screening. Methods Studies that compared the diagnostic performance of colonoscopy and second-generation colon capsule endoscopy (CCE-2) for screening of asymptomatic patients aged 50-75 years were included. The primary outcomes were sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios for polyps and adenomas measuring at least 6 mm or 10 mm. Results Eight full-text studies that evaluated 1602 patients were included for systematic review. Of these, 840 (52.43%) patients participated in an opportunistic screening program. The pooled outcomes of CCE-2 for polyps at least 6 mm / 10 mm were (CI = confidence interval): sensitivity: 88% (95% CI: 0.84-0.91) / 88% (95% CI: 0.82-0.93), specificity: 94% (95% CI: 0.92-0.95) / 95.5% (95% CI: 0.94-0.97); positive likelihood ratio: 11.86 (95% CI: 5.53-25.46) / 23.07 (95% CI: 6.163-86.36); negative likelihood ratio: 0.14 (95% CI: 0.1-0.21) / 0.14 (95% CI: 0.09-0.21). The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve for polyps at least 6 and 10 mm was 96.3% and 96.7%, respectively. The only cancer missed by complete CCE-2 was shown at multiple frames in the unblinded review. In total, 125 (7.8%) patients presented mild adverse events mostly related to bowel preparation. Conclusion CCE-2 is demonstrated to be an effective and safe alternative method for colorectal cancer screening. Diagnostic performance of CCE-2 for polyps of at least 6 and 10 mm was similar. Completion rates still need to be improved.
  • bookPart
    Reganho de Peso
    (2017) BRUNALDI, Vitor Ottoboni; MOURA, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de; SAKAI, Christiano Makoto; MOURA, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de
  • article 35 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Endoscopic versus surgical treatment for pancreatic pseudocysts Systematic review and meta-analysis
    (2019) FARIAS, Galileu F. A.; BERNARDO, Wanderley M.; MOURA, Diogo T. H. De; GUEDES, Hugo G.; BRUNALDI, Vitor O.; VISCONTI, Thiago A. de C.; GONCALVES, Caio V. T.; SAKAI, Christiano M.; MATUGUMA, Sergio E.; SANTOS, Marcos E. L. dos; SAKAI, Paulo; MOURA, Eduardo G. H. De
    Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare surgical and endoscopic treatment for pancreatic pseudocyst (PP). Methods: The researchers did a search in Medline, EMBASE, Scielo/Lilacs, and Cochrane electronic databases for studies comparing surgical and endoscopic drainage of PP s in adult patients. Then, the extracted data were used to perform a meta-analysis. The outcomes were therapeutic success, drainage-related adverse events, general adverse events, recurrence rate, cost, and time of hospitalization. Results: There was no significant difference between treatment success rate (risk difference [RD] -0.09; 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.20,0.01]; P = .07), drainage-related adverse events (RD -0.02; 95% CI [-0.04,0.08]; P = .48), general adverse events (RD -0.05; 95% CI [-0.12, 0.02]; P = .13) and recurrence (RD: 0.02; 95% CI [-0.04,0.07]; P = .58) between surgical and endoscopic treatment. Regarding time of hospitalization, the endoscopic group had better results (RD: -4.23; 95% CI [-5.18, -3.29]; P < .00001). When it comes to treatment cost, the endoscopic arm also had better outcomes (RD: -4.68; 95% CI [-5.43,-3.94]; P < .00001). Conclusion: There is no significant difference between surgical and endoscopic treatment success rates, adverse events and recurrence for PP. However, time of hospitalization and treatment costs were lower in the endoscopic group.
  • article 14 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Computed tomography colonography versus colonoscopy for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    (2018) DUARTE, Ralph B.; BERNARDO, Wanderley M.; SAKAI, Christiano M.; SILVA, Gustavo L. R.; GUEDES, Hugo G.; KUGA, Rogerio; IDE, Edson; ISHIDA, Robson K.; SAKAI, Paulo; MOURA, Eduardo G. H. de
    Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Optical colonoscopy (OC) is the first choice of investigation for assessing the state of the colon and it is excellent for CRC screening. Newer technologies such as computed tomography colonography (CTC) may also be useful in CRC screening. This systematic review compares the benefits of CTC and OC for CRC screening. This review includes all the available randomized clinical trials comparing CTC and OC for CRC screening in asymptomatic patients. Three studies were included in the systematic review and were submitted for meta-analysis. In the analysis of participation rates, only 2,333 of 8,104 (29%) patients who were invited for screening underwent the CTC, and only 1,486 of the 7,310 (20%) patients who were invited for screening underwent OC. The absolute risk difference in participation rate in the two procedures was 0.1 (95% CI, 0.05-0.14) in favor of CTC. In the analysis of advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACN) detection rates, 2,357 patients undergoing CTC and 1,524 patients undergoing OC were included. Of these, 135 patients (5.7%) who underwent a CTC and 130 patients (8.5%) who underwent an OC were diagnosed with ACN. The absolute risk difference in ACN detection rate in the two procedure types was -0.02 (with a 95% CI between -0.04 and -0.00) in favor of OC. CTC is an option for CRC screening in asymptomatic patients. However, as CTC was inferior in detecting ACN, it should not replace OC, which remains the gold standard.
  • bookPart
    Abordagem Endoscópica das Doenças Motoras do Trato Gastrointestinal: Divertículo de Zenker: Abordagem Endoscópica e Cirúrgica
    (2017) ALBERS, Débora Vieira; ROCHA, Rodrigo Silva de Paula; IDE, Edson; SAKAI, Christiano Makoto; SAKAI, Paulo
  • article 12 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Endoscopic Tunneled Stricturotomy with Full-Thickness Dissection in the Management of a Sleeve Gastrectomy Stenosis
    (2019) MOURA, Eduardo Guimaraes Hourneaux De; MOURA, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de; SAKAI, Christiano Makoto; SAGAE, Vitor; MADRUGA NETO, Antonio Coutinho; THOMPSON, Christopher C.
    Introduction Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is becoming the most commonly performed bariatric surgery. Despite clinical efficacy, adverse events have gradually increase due to its rapid adoption. Sleeve stenosis is the second most common adverse event, occurring in 0.7 to 4% of patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Endoscopic management with pneumatic balloon dilation (PBD) or stent placement is commonly performed, with a success rate of up to 88%. Recently, Moura et al. (VideoGIE 4(2):68-71, 2018) described a new technique, named as endoscopic tunneled stricturotomy. In this video, we demonstrated the evolution of this technique including full-thickness dissection with staple line disruption. Methods A 28-year-old woman with a BMI of 35.3 kg/m(2) who underwent LSG, presented with dysphagia to solid food. An upper GI series showed a stenosis at the level of the incisura angularis. The patient was then referred for endoscopic evaluation. Results She underwent three endoscopic PBD in an attempt to treat the stenosis. Unfortunately, her symptoms did not improve. After failed PBD treatment, an endoscopic tunneled stricturotomy with full-thickness dissection was performed. The procedure is performed in 6 steps: (1) identification of the stenosis, (2) submucosal injection 3-5 cm before the stenosis, (3) incision, (4) submucosal tunneling, (5) stricturotomy with full-thickness dissection, and (6) mucosal closure. During follow-up, the patient maintained a 1200-cal diet, without recurrence of symptoms. Conclusion Endoscopic tunneled stricturotomy with full-thickness dissection is feasible and appears to be safe and effective in the management of stenosis after sleeve gastrectomy. This procedure may be an option after conventional treatment failure or may be considered as a primary alternative.
  • conferenceObject
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF COLON CAPSULE ENDOSCOPY ACCURACY FOR COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING. AN ALTERNATIVE DURING THE COVID ERA?
    (2021) SULBARAN, Marianny; BERNARDO, Wanderley M.; BUSTAMANTE-LOPEZ, Leonardo A.; SAKAI, Christiano M.; SAKAI, Paulo; NAHAS, Sergio C.; MOURA, Eduardo G. De