AAGL 2021 Endometriosis Classification: An Anatomy-based Surgical Complexity Score

Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
Tipo de produção
Data de publicação
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, v.28, n.11, p.1941-1950.e1, 2021
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Study Objective: To develop a new endometriosis classification system for scoring intraoperative surgical complexity and to examine its correlation with patient-reported pain and infertility. Design: Multicenter study of patients treated at 3 recognized endometriosis centers. Setting: Three specialized endometriosis surgical centers in São Paulo, Brazil and Barcelona, Spain. Patients: Patients aged 15 to 45 years with histologically proven endometriosis and no history of pelvic malignancy underwent laparoscopic treatment of endometriosis. Interventions: Demographic data and clinical history, including dysmenorrhea, noncyclic pelvic pain, dyspareunia, dysuria and dyschezia, were prospectively recorded. All patients were staged surgically according to the new 2021 American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists (AAGL) and revised American Society of Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) classification systems. The staging for each system was compared against a 4-level surgical complexity scale defined by the most complex procedure performed. Measurements and Main Results: A total of 1224 patients undergoing surgery met inclusion criteria. The AAGL score discriminated between 4 stages of surgical complexity with high reproducibility (κ = 0.621), whereas the ASRM score discriminated between the complexity stages with poor reproducibility (κ = 0.317). The AAGL staging system correlated with dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, dyschezia, total pain score, and infertility comparably with the ASRM staging system. Conclusion: The AAGL 2021 Endometriosis Classification allows for identifying objective intraoperative findings that reliably discriminate surgical complexity levels better than the ASRM staging system. The AAGL severity stage correlates comparably with pain and infertility symptoms with the ASRM stage. © 2021 AAGL
Endometriosis, Infertility, Laparoscopy, Pelvic pain, Staging
  1. Acosta, A.A., Buttram, V.C., Besch, P.K., Malinak, L.R., Franklin, R.R., Vanderheyden, J.D., A proposed classification of pelvic endometriosis (1973) Obstet Gynecol, 42, pp. 19-25
  2. Revised American Fertility Society classification of endometriosis: 1985 (1985) Fertil Steril, 43, pp. 351-352
  3. Revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine classification of endometriosis: 1996 (1997) Fertil Steril, 67, pp. 817-821
  4. Adamson, G.D., Pasta, D.J., Endometriosis fertility index: the new, validated endometriosis staging system (2010) Fertil Steril, 94, pp. 1609-1615
  5. Tuttlies, F., Keckstein, J., Ulrich, U., [ENZIAN-score, a classification of deep infiltrating endometriosis] (2005) Zentralbl Gynakol, 127, pp. 275-281
  6. Classification of endometriosis. The American Fertility Society (1979) Fertil Steril, 32, pp. 633-634
  7. Beecham, C.T., Classification of endometriosis (1966) Obstet Gynecol, 28, p. 437
  8. Andres, M.P., Borrelli, G.M., Abrão, M.S., Endometriosis classification according to pain symptoms: can the ASRM classification be improved? (2018) Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 51, pp. 111-118
  9. Fourquet, J., Zavala, D.E., Missmer, S., Bracero, N., Romaguera, J., Flores, I., Disparities in healthcare services in women with endometriosis with public vs private health insurance (2019) Am J Obstet Gynecol, 221, pp. 623.e1-623.e11
  10. Soliman, A.M., Yang, H., Du, E.X., Kelley, C., Winkel, C., The direct and indirect costs associated with endometriosis: a systematic literature review (2016) Hum Reprod, 31, pp. 712-722
  11. Soliman, A.M., Surrey, E.S., Bonafede, M., Nelson, J.K., Vora, J.B., Agarwal, S.K., Health care utilization and costs associated with endometriosis among women with Medicaid insurance (2019) J Manag Care Spec Pharm, 25, pp. 566-572
  12. Keckstein, J., Hudelist, G., Classification of deep endometriosis (DE) including bowel endometriosis: from r-ASRM to #Enzian-classification (2021) Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 71, pp. 27-37
  13. Koninckx, P.R., Martin, D., Treatment of deeply infiltrating endometriosis (1994) Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 6, pp. 231-241
  14. Nisolle, M., Donnez, J., Reprint of: peritoneal endometriosis, ovarian endometriosis, and adenomyotic nodules of the rectovaginal septum are three different entities (2019) Fertil Steril, 112, pp. e125-e136
  15. Kondo, W., Bourdel, N., Tamburro, S., Complications after surgery for deeply infiltrating pelvic endometriosis (2011) BJOG, 118, pp. 292-298
  16. Harris, P.A., Taylor, R., Minor, B.L., The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners (2019) J Biomed Inform, 95
  17. Lee, S.Y., Koo, Y.J., Lee, D.H., Classification of endometriosis (2021) Yeungnam Univ J Med, 38, pp. 10-18
  18. Fauconnier, A., Chapron, C., Dubuisson, J.B., Vieira, M., Dousset, B., Bréart, G., Relation between pain symptoms and the anatomic location of deep infiltrating endometriosis (2002) Fertil Steril, 78, pp. 719-726
  19. Lamvu, G., Carrillo, J., Ouyang, C., Rapkin, A., Chronic pelvic pain in women: a review (2021) JAMA, 325, pp. 2381-2391
  20. Fraga, M.V., Oliveira Brito, L.G., Yela, D.A., de Mira, T.A., Benetti-Pinto, C.L., Pelvic floor muscle dysfunctions in women with deep infiltrative endometriosis: an underestimated association (2021) Int J Clin Pract, 75, p. e14350
  21. Nisenblat, V., Bossuyt, P.M., Farquhar, C., Johnson, N., Hull, M.L., Imaging modalities for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis (2016) Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2
  22. Goncalves, M.O., Podgaec, S., Dias, J.A., Gonzalez, M., Abrao, M.S., Transvaginal ultrasonography with bowel preparation is able to predict the number of lesions and rectosigmoid layers affected in cases of deep endometriosis, defining surgical strategy (2010) Hum Reprod, 25, pp. 665-671
  23. Ros, C., Rius, M., Abrao, M.S., Bowel preparation prior to transvaginal ultrasound improves detection of rectosigmoid deep infiltrating endometriosis and is well tolerated: prospective study of women with suspected endometriosis without surgical criteria (2021) Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 57, pp. 335-341
  24. Bordonné, C., Puntonet, J., Maitrot-Mantelet, L., Imaging for evaluation of endometriosis and adenomyosis (2021) Minerva Obstet Gynecol, 73, pp. 290-303
  25. Abrão, M.S., Andres, M.P., Barbosa, R.N., Bassi, M.A., Kho, R.M., Optimizing perioperative outcomes with selective bowel resection following an algorithm based on preoperative imaging for bowel endometriosis (2020) J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 27, pp. 883-891
  26. Kho, R.M., Andres, M.P., Borrelli, G.M., Neto, J.S., Zanluchi, A., Abrão, M.S., Surgical treatment of different types of endometriosis: comparison of major society guidelines and preferred clinical algorithms (2018) Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 51, pp. 102-110
  27. Guerriero, S., Condous, G., van den Bosch, T., Systematic approach to sonographic evaluation of the pelvis in women with suspected endometriosis, including terms, definitions and measurements: a consensus opinion from the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group (2016) Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 48, pp. 318-332