Measurement of uncertainty tolerance revisited

Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Citações na Scopus
0
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2023
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
WILEY
Citação
CLINICAL TEACHER, v.20, n.6, 2023
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
IntroductionUncertainty tolerance (UT) is attracting increasing attention in medical education due to the numerous challenges associated with uncertainty in professional life. Inconsistencies in analysing the relationship between UT and moderators may arise from inadequate measurement methods. Most instruments were formulated before the most widely accepted framework was published. Our aim was to investigate the validity of an UT scale using an actual framework to corroborate with better and accurate instruments. MethodsA total of 1052 students were invited. Various psychometric methods were used to explore validity of the TAMSAD scale in light of actual framework. Classic exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were performed. Secondly, content item classification was triangulated with exploratory graph analysis (EGA), and the new EFA, CFA, and cognitive diagnostic modelling (CDM) analysis were conducted. The reliability was calculated using Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega. ResultsA total of 694 students (65.9%) responded to the questionnaire. The reliability of the TAMSAD scale was 0.782. The initial EFA revealed no clear interpretable dimensions. The TAMSAD scale items can be classified into sources of uncertainty. The EGA has three dimensions, and the new EFA led to a 17-item TAMSAD scale with the following three dimensions: ambiguity, complexity, and probability. These dimensions lead to better adjustment fit indices in the new CFA and CDM analyses. ConclusionWe found evidence that the TAMSAD scale can be considered a multidimensional scale, organised in terms of sources of uncertainty.
Palavras-chave
Referências
  1. Akoglu H, 2018, TURK J EMERG MED, V18, P91, DOI 10.1016/j.tjem.2018.08.001
  2. Ayre C, 2014, MEAS EVAL COUNS DEV, V47, P79, DOI 10.1177/0748175613513808
  3. Beaton DE, 2000, SPINE, V25, P3186, DOI 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
  4. Collares CF, 2022, ADV HEALTH SCI EDUC, V27, P427, DOI 10.1007/s10459-022-10093-y
  5. Cooke GPE, 2013, BMC MED EDUC, V13, DOI 10.1186/1472-6920-13-2
  6. Croskerry P, 2013, NEW ENGL J MED, V368, P2445, DOI 10.1056/NEJMp1303712
  7. Di Trani M, 2021, FRONT PSYCHOL, V12, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.646435
  8. García PE, 2014, PSICOTHEMA, V26, P372, DOI 10.7334/psicothema2013.322
  9. GELLER G, 1993, MED CARE, V31, P989, DOI 10.1097/00005650-199311000-00002
  10. GERRITY MS, 1990, MED CARE, V28, P724, DOI 10.1097/00005650-199008000-00005
  11. Gerrity MS, 1995, MOTIV EMOTION, V19, P175, DOI 10.1007/BF02250510
  12. Golino H, 2020, PSYCHOL METHODS, V25, P292, DOI 10.1037/met0000255
  13. Golino HF, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0174035
  14. Gowda Deepthiman, 2018, Acad Med, V93, pS8, DOI 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002379
  15. Hall KH, 2002, MED EDUC, V36, P216, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01140.x
  16. Han PKJ, 2021, MED DECIS MAKING, V41, P275, DOI 10.1177/0272989X21992340
  17. Han PKJ, 2013, MED CARE RES REV, V70, p14S, DOI 10.1177/1077558712459361
  18. Hancock J, 2020, MED EDUC, V54, P125, DOI 10.1111/medu.14031
  19. Hancock J, 2015, ADV HEALTH SCI EDUC, V20, P113, DOI 10.1007/s10459-014-9510-z
  20. Harden RM, 1999, MED TEACH, V21, P546, DOI 10.1080/01421599978951
  21. Hillen MA, 2017, SOC SCI MED, V180, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.03.024
  22. Iannello P, 2017, MED EDUC ONLINE, V22, DOI 10.1080/10872981.2016.1270009
  23. Kim Kangmoon, 2018, Korean J Med Educ, V30, P181, DOI 10.3946/kjme.2018.92
  24. Knight LV, 2006, SOC SCI MED, V63, P1084, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.01.017
  25. Kuhn G, 2009, ANN EMERG MED, V54, P106, DOI 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.12.019
  26. Levites MR., 2018, ARCH MED FAM, V20, P59
  27. Libert Y, 2016, PATIENT EDUC COUNS, V99, P1121, DOI 10.1016/j.pec.2016.01.008
  28. Libert Y, 2017, PATIENT EDUC COUNS, V100, P1672, DOI 10.1016/j.pec.2017.02.025
  29. Moffett J, 2022, BMC MED EDUC, V22, DOI 10.1186/s12909-022-03180-6
  30. Ndoja S, 2020, BMC MED EDUC, V20, DOI 10.1186/s12909-020-02345-5
  31. Patel P, 2022, MED EDUC, V56, P1163, DOI 10.1111/medu.14873
  32. Rysavy Matthew, 2013, Virtual Mentor, V15, P4, DOI 10.1001/virtualmentor.2013.15.1.fred1-1301
  33. Santella F., 2015, REV BRAS EDUC MED, V39, P261, DOI [10.1590/1981-52712015v39n2e00832014, DOI 10.1590/1981-52712015V39N2E00832014]
  34. Simpkin AL, 2018, ACAD PEDIATR, V18, P698, DOI 10.1016/j.acap.2018.03.002
  35. Stephens GC, 2022, ACAD MED, V97, P1413, DOI 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004641
  36. Wayne S, 2011, ACAD MED, V86, P877, DOI 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31821dac01