Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/1646
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSistema FMUSP-HC: Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP) e Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP
dc.contributor.authorCLAROS, Oliver Rojas
dc.contributor.authorSILVA, Carlos Hirokatsu Watanabe
dc.contributor.authorCONSOLMAGNO, Horacio
dc.contributor.authorSAKAI, Americo Toshiaki
dc.contributor.authorFREDDY, Rodrigo
dc.contributor.authorFUGITA, Oscar Eduardo Hidetoshi
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-30T19:13:18Z
dc.date.available2013-07-30T19:13:18Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationCLINICS, v.67, n.5, p.415-418, 2012
dc.identifier.issn1807-5932
dc.identifier.urihttps://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/1646
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: Urinary lithiasis is a common disease. The aim of the present study is to assess the knowledge regarding the diagnosis, treatment and recommendations given to patients with ureteral colic by professionals of an academic hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-five physicians were interviewed about previous experience with guidelines regarding ureteral colic and how they manage patients with ureteral colic in regards to diagnosis, treatment and the information provided to the patients. RESULTS: Thirty-six percent of the interviewed physicians were surgeons, and 64% were clinicians. Forty-one percent of the physicians reported experience with ureterolithiasis guidelines. Seventy-two percent indicated that they use noncontrast CT scans for the diagnosis of lithiasis. All of the respondents prescribe hydration, primarily for the improvement of stone elimination (39.3%). The average number of drugs used was 3.5. The combination of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids was reported by 54% of the physicians (i. e., 59% of surgeons and 25.6% of clinicians used this combination of drugs) (p = 0.014). Only 21.3% prescribe alpha blockers. CONCLUSION: Reported experience with guidelines had little impact on several habitual practices. For example, only 21.3% of the respondents indicated that they prescribed alpha blockers; however, alpha blockers may increase stone elimination by up to 54%. Furthermore, although a meta-analysis demonstrated that hydration had no effect on the transit time of the stone or on the pain, the majority of the physicians reported that they prescribed more than 500 ml of fluid. Dipyrone, hyoscine, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and opioids were identified as the most frequently prescribed drug combination. The information regarding the time for the passage of urinary stones was inconsistent. The development of continuing education programs regarding ureteral colic in the emergency room is necessary.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherHOSPITAL CLINICAS, UNIV SAO PAULO
dc.relation.ispartofClinics
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.subjectUreterolithiasis
dc.subjectEmergency Department
dc.subjectUniversity Hospital
dc.subject.otherstone passage
dc.subject.otherspiral ct
dc.subject.otherefficacy
dc.titleCurrent practices in the management of patients with ureteral calculi in the emergency room of a university hospital
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.holderCopyright HOSPITAL CLINICAS, UNIV SAO PAULO
dc.identifier.doi10.6061/clinics/2012(05)02
dc.identifier.pmid22666782
dc.subject.wosMedicine, General & Internal
dc.type.categoryoriginal article
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
hcfmusp.author.externalFREDDY, Rodrigo:Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Med, Hosp Univ, Sao Paulo, Brazil
hcfmusp.description.beginpage415
hcfmusp.description.endpage418
hcfmusp.description.issue5
hcfmusp.description.volume67
hcfmusp.origemWOS
hcfmusp.origem.idWOS:000304827700002
hcfmusp.origem.id2-s2.0-84863953095
hcfmusp.origem.idSCIELO:S1807-59322012000500002
hcfmusp.publisher.citySAO PAULO
hcfmusp.publisher.countryBRAZIL
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBrener ZZ, 2011, SOUTH MED J, V104, P133, DOI 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e318206f6bd
hcfmusp.relation.referenceEray O, 2003, AM J EMERG MED, V21, P152, DOI 10.1053/ajem.2003.50027
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHoldgate A, 2004, BRIT MED J, V328, P1401, DOI 10.1136/bmj.38119.581991.55
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHollingsworth JM, 2006, LANCET, V368, P1171, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69474-9
hcfmusp.relation.referenceLotan Y, 2009, ADV CHRONIC KIDNEY D, V16, P5, DOI 10.1053/j.ackd.2008.10.002
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMiller Janet C, 2006, J Am Coll Radiol, V3, P814, DOI 10.1016/j.jacr.2006.02.038
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMiller O F, 2000, Curr Opin Urol, V10, P123, DOI 10.1097/00042307-200003000-00013
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMiller OF, 1999, J UROLOGY, V162, P688, DOI 10.1097/00005392-199909010-00014
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMiller OF, 1999, J UROLOGY, V162, P690
hcfmusp.relation.referencePhillips E, 2009, J ENDOUROL, V23, P1021, DOI 10.1089/end.2008.0615
hcfmusp.relation.referencePreminger GM, 2007, EUR UROL, V52, P1610, DOI 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.09.039
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSpringhart WP, 2006, J ENDOUROL, V20, P713, DOI 10.1089/end.2006.20.713
hcfmusp.relation.referenceTrinchieri Alberto, 2008, Arch Ital Urol Androl, V80, P1
hcfmusp.relation.referenceYilmaz S, 1998, EUR RADIOL, V8, P212, DOI 10.1007/s003300050364
dc.description.indexMEDLINE
hcfmusp.citation.scopus6
hcfmusp.scopus.lastupdate2024-03-28-
Appears in Collections:

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/ICHC
Instituto Central - HC/ICHC

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HU
Hospital Universitário - HU


Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
art_CLAROS_Current_practices_in_the_management_of_patients_with_2012.PDFpublishedVersion (English)923.35 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.