Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/22962
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSistema FMUSP-HC: Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP) e Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP-
dc.contributor.authorMENEZES, Marcia H. M.-
dc.contributor.authorUBRIG-ZANCANELLA, Maysa T.-
dc.contributor.authorCUNHA, Maria Gabriela B.-
dc.contributor.authorCORDEIRO, Gislaine F.-
dc.contributor.authorNEMR, Katia-
dc.contributor.authorTSUJI, Domingos H.-
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-27T16:26:39Z-
dc.date.available2017-11-27T16:26:39Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.citationJOURNAL OF VOICE, v.25, n.4, p.E167-E175, 2011-
dc.identifier.issn0892-1997-
dc.identifier.urihttps://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/22962-
dc.description.abstractObjective. To assess the relationship between tongue trill performance duration and auditory perception and acoustic changes in dysphonic women. Study Design. Prospective clinical study, with intrasubject comparison. Methods. Twenty-seven women who had vocal nodules were in the experimental group (EG) (tongue trills), and 10 were also in the control group (CG) (placebo exercises). The voices were recorded before and after experimental and placebo exercises at the first (m1), third (m3), fifth (m5), and seventh (m7) minutes of performance. These recordings were randomized, and the auditory perception analysis was carried out by three judges trained in voice analysis. Individual recordings were analyzed using the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) protocol, the randomized pairs of recordings were compared, and the better voice was chosen. VoxMetria software (CTS, Parana, Brazil, www.ctsinformatica.com.br) was used to assess the acoustic. Results. In the EG, the CAPE-V results showed a predominance of vocal improvement, statistically proven, at m5 of tongue trill exercise, with the best overall rating, the least roughness and breathiness, and increase in pitch level. At m7, strain was significantly higher. In the paired comparison analysis, voices at m5 were considered the best of all moments. There was an increase of the F-0 and glottal-to-noise excitation after m3 and a decrease in noise as in m1. In the CG, vocal changes were discrete compared with those in the EG. Conclusion. Tongue trill performance duration interfered with the vocal response of dysphonic women, with positive response predominance at m5. At m7, there was an increase of vocal tension and a drop in vocal quality.-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherMOSBY-ELSEVIER-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Voice-
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess-
dc.subjectVoice-
dc.subjectVoice training-
dc.subjectVoice quality-
dc.subject.otherfundamental-frequency-
dc.subject.othersubglottal pressure-
dc.subject.othervoice therapy-
dc.subject.othernodules-
dc.subject.othermuscle-
dc.subject.otherphonation-
dc.subject.othervibration-
dc.subject.otherparalysis-
dc.subject.otherfatigue-
dc.subject.otheradults-
dc.titleThe Relationship Between Tongue Trill Performance Duration and Vocal Changes in Dysphonic Women-
dc.typearticle-
dc.rights.holderCopyright MOSBY-ELSEVIER-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jvoice.2010.03.009-
dc.identifier.pmid20655703-
dc.subject.wosOtorhinolaryngology-
dc.type.categoryoriginal article-
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion-
hcfmusp.author.externalCUNHA, Maria Gabriela B.:Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Otolaryngol, Sao Paulo, Brazil-
hcfmusp.description.beginpageE167-
hcfmusp.description.endpageE175-
hcfmusp.description.issue4-
hcfmusp.description.volume25-
hcfmusp.origemWOS-
hcfmusp.origem.id2-s2.0-79958728407-
hcfmusp.origem.idWOS:000306466500002-
hcfmusp.publisher.cityNEW YORK-
hcfmusp.publisher.countryUSA-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceAlipour F, 2005, J VOICE, V19, P350, DOI 10.1016/j.jvoice.2004.04.005-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGaskill CS, 2008, J VOICE, V22, P634, DOI 10.1016/j.jvoice.2007.03.012-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceLaukkanen AM, 2008, FOLIA PHONIATR LOGO, V60, P298, DOI 10.1159/000170080-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGelfer MP, 2006, J VOICE, V20, P369, DOI 10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.03.011-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMiller S, 2004, OTOLARYNG CLIN N AM, V37, P105, DOI 10.1016/S0030-6665(03)00163-4-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMichaelis D, 1997, ACUSTICA, V83, P700-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceKARNI A, 1995, NATURE, V377, P155-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceTITZE IR, 1989, J ACOUST SOC AM, V85, P901, DOI 10.1121/1.397562-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceWelham NV, 2003, J VOICE, V17, P21, DOI 10.1016/S0892-1997(03)00033-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceJiang JJ, 1998, ANN OTO RHINOL LARYN, V107, P603-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMCCARTHY JP, 1995, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V27, P429-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceLeonard R, 2009, CURR OPIN OTOLARYNGO, V17, P453, DOI 10.1097/MOO.0b013e3283317fd2-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceAndersen JL, 2000, SCI AM, V283, P48-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceZhang K, 2009, J VOICE, V23, P277, DOI 10.1016/j.jvoice.2007.09.010-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceKarkos PD, 2009, CURR OPIN OTOLARYNGO, V17, P420, DOI 10.1097/MOO.0b013e328331a7f8-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceASHA, 2002, CONS AUD PERC EV VOI-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBehlau M, 2005, VOZ LIVRO ESPECIALIS, V2, P409-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceColton R, 1996, UNDERSTANDING VOICE, P270-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceFerrand CT, 1998, J VOICE, V12, P175-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGarrel R, 2007, EUR ARCH OTO-RHINO-L, V264, P1201, DOI 10.1007/s00405-007-0348-3-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGodino-Llorente JI, 2010, J VOICE, V24, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.jvoice.2008.04.006-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHirano M., 1981, CLIN EXAMINATION VOI, P81-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHsiao TY, 2001, J VOICE, V15, P187, DOI 10.1016/S0892-1997(01)00020-0-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceImamura R, 2000, ANN OTO RHINOL LARYN, V110, P158-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceLaukkanen AM, 2008, J VOICE, V22, P283, DOI 10.1016/j.jvoice.2006.10.001-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMcGowan RS, 1992, J ACOUST SOC AM, V91, P293-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMenezes MH, 2005, J VOICE, V19, P61, DOI 10.1016/j.jvoice.2003.11.002-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMinamoto VB, 2005, FISIOT PESQUI, V12, P50-
hcfmusp.relation.referencePartone C, 2008, J VOICE, V22, P192-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceRuotsalainen JH, 2007, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD006372.pub2-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSaxon K. G., 1995, VOCAL EXERCISE PHYSL-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSaxon KG, 2009, J SINGING, V66, P51-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceTitze IR, 2006, J SPEECH LANG HEAR R, V49, P448, DOI 10.1044/1092-4388(2006/035)-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceVerdolini K, 2006, CLASSIFICATION MANUA-
dc.description.indexMEDLINE-
hcfmusp.citation.scopus33-
hcfmusp.scopus.lastupdate2022-11-04-
Appears in Collections:

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MFT
Departamento de Fisioterapia, Fonoaudiologia e Terapia Ocupacional - FM/MFT

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MOF
Departamento de Otorrinolaringologia e Oftalmologia - FM/MOF

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/ICHC
Instituto Central - HC/ICHC

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/IOT
Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia - HC/IOT

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/32
LIM/32 - Laboratório de Otorrinolaringologia


Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.