Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/23265
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSistema FMUSP-HC: Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP) e Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP-
dc.contributor.authorBIASE, M. E. M. De-
dc.contributor.authorPOLITTI, F.-
dc.contributor.authorPALOMARI, E. T.-
dc.contributor.authorBARROS-FILHO, T. E. P.-
dc.contributor.authorCAMARGO, O. P. De-
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-27T16:33:06Z-
dc.date.available2017-11-27T16:33:06Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.citationPHYSIOTHERAPY, v.97, n.2, p.175-179, 2011-
dc.identifier.issn0031-9406-
dc.identifier.urihttps://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/23265-
dc.description.abstractObjective To study increases in electromyographic (EMG) response from the right and left rectus femoris muscles of individuals with long-term cervical spinal cord injuries after EMG biofeedback treatment. Design Repeated measure trials compared EMG responses before and after biofeedback treatment in patients with spinal cord injuries. Main outcome measures The Neuroeducator was used to analyse and provide feedback of the EMG signal and to measure EMG response. Setting Department of Traumatic Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Brazil. Participants Twenty subjects (three men and 17 women), between 21 and 49 years of age, with incomplete spinal cord injury at level C6 or higher (range C2 to C6). Of these subjects, 10 received their spinal cord injuries from motor vehicle accidents, one from a gunshot, five from diving, three from falls and one from spinal disc herniation. Results Significant differences were found in the EMG response of the right rectus femoris muscle between pre-initial (T1), post-initial (T2) and additional (T3) biofeedback treatment with the subjects in a sitting position [mean (standard deviation) T1: 26 mu V (29); T2: 67 mu V (50); T3: 77 mu V (62)]. The mean differences and 95% confidence intervals for these comparisons were as follows: T1 to T2, -40.7 (-53.1 to -29.4); T2 to T3, -9.6 (-26.1 to 2.3). Similar differences were found for the left leg in a sitting position and for both legs in the sit-to-stand condition. Conclusions The EMG responses obtained in this study showed that treatment involving EMG biofeedback significantly increased voluntary EMG responses from right and left rectus femoris muscles in individuals with spinal cord injuries.-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCI LTD-
dc.relation.ispartofPhysiotherapy-
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess-
dc.subjectElectromyography-
dc.subjectBiofeedback-
dc.subjectSpinal cord injury-
dc.subjectLower limb-
dc.subjectRehabilitation-
dc.subjectRectus femoris muscle-
dc.subject.otherplasticity-
dc.subject.otherstimulation-
dc.titleIncreased EMG response following electromyographic biofeedback treatment of rectus femoris muscle after spinal cord injury-
dc.typearticle-
dc.rights.holderCopyright ELSEVIER SCI LTD-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.physio.2010.05.005-
dc.identifier.pmid21497253-
dc.subject.wosRehabilitation-
dc.type.categoryoriginal article-
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion-
hcfmusp.author.externalBIASE, M. E. M. De:Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Med, Inst Orthopaed & Traumatol, Hosp Clin, Sao Paulo, Brazil-
hcfmusp.author.externalPOLITTI, F.:Univ Estadual Campinas, Inst Biol, Dept Anat, Campinas, SP, Brazil; Nove Julho Univ, Rehabil Sci Dept, Uninove, Brazil-
hcfmusp.author.externalPALOMARI, E. T.:Univ Estadual Campinas, Inst Biol, Dept Anat, Campinas, SP, Brazil-
hcfmusp.description.beginpage175-
hcfmusp.description.endpage179-
hcfmusp.description.issue2-
hcfmusp.description.volume97-
hcfmusp.origemWOS-
hcfmusp.origem.idWOS:000289547300012-
hcfmusp.origem.id2-s2.0-79954625507-
hcfmusp.publisher.cityOXFORD-
hcfmusp.publisher.countryENGLAND-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceAmerican Spinal Injury Association, 2002, INT STAND NEUR CLASS-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHermens HJ, 2000, J ELECTROMYOGR KINES, V10, P361, DOI 10.1016/S1050-6411(00)00027-4-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHagg T, 2006, J NEUROTRAUM, V23, P264-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceASHWORTH B, 1964, PRACTITIONER, V192, P540-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSTEIN RB, 1990, J NEUROL NEUROSUR PS, V53, P880, DOI 10.1136/jnnp.53.10.880-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceRamer LM, 2005, SPINAL CORD, V43, P134, DOI 10.1038/sj.sc.3101715-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceNorton JA, 2006, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V95, P2580, DOI 10.1152/jn.01289.2005-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceLynskey JV, 2008, J REHABIL RES DEV, V45, P229, DOI 10.1682/JRRD.2007.03.0047-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceLEVY WJ, 1990, BRAIN RES, V510, P130, DOI 10.1016/0006-8993(90)90738-W-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceRaineteau O, 2001, NAT REV NEUROSCI, V2, P263, DOI 10.1038/35067570-
hcfmusp.relation.referencevan Tuijl JH, 2002, SPINAL CORD, V40, P51, DOI 10.1038/sj.sc.3101261-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceThomas SL, 2005, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V94, P2844, DOI 10.1152/jn.00532.2005-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGreen JB, 1999, NEUROLOGY, V53, P736-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceDursun N, 2001, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V82, P1692, DOI 10.1053/apmr.2001.26253-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBrucker BS, 1996, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V77, P133, DOI 10.1016/S0003-9993(96)90157-4-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBRUCKER BS, 1980, BEHAVIORAL PSYCHOL R, P188-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceCOHEN LG, 1991, NEUROLOGY, V41, P1283-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceDing YM, 2005, CURR PHARM DESIGN, V11, P1441, DOI 10.2174/1381612053507855-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceINGERSOLL C D, 1991, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, V23, P1122-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceThurman DJ, 1995, GUIDELINES SURVEILLA-
dc.description.indexMEDLINE-
hcfmusp.citation.scopus12-
hcfmusp.scopus.lastupdate2024-04-12-
Appears in Collections:

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MOT
Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia - FM/MOT

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/41
LIM/41 - Laboratório de Investigação Médica do Sistema Músculoesquelético


Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
art_BIASE_Increased_EMG_response_following_electromyographic_biofeedback_treatment_of_2011.PDF
  Restricted Access
publishedVersion (English)136.55 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.