Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/2652
Título: Incidence of Intraoperative Anaphylaxis in A University General Hospital in Brazil
Autor: GARRO, Laila SabinoCARMONA, Maria Jose CarvalhoSOARES, Iracy Silvia CorreaAUN, Marcelo VivoloRIBEIRO, Marisa RosimeireRODRIGUES, Adriana TeixeiraKALIL, JorgeGIAVINA-BIANCHI, PedroMOTTA, Antonio Abilio
Citación: JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, v.131, n.2, suppl.S, p.AB177-AB177, 2013
Resumen: RATIONALE: The epidemiology of intraoperative anaphylaxis is un-known in Brazil. We aimed to evaluate the incidence and clinical features of anaphylaxis during anesthesia in a University General Hospital in Sao Paulo, Brazil. METHODS: A cross-sectional, observational study analyzing data fromvoluntary notification sent by anesthesiologists, about occurrence of intraoperative anaphylaxis during the period between January and December 2010. The diagnostic criteria for anaphylaxis were based onthe World Allergy Organization Guidelines. We analyzed the incidence of intraoperative anaphylaxis, clinical features, severity of anaphylaxis, types of surgical procedures, classification of anesthetic risk (American Society of Anesthesiologists - ASA), culprit agent cited by the anesthesiologist and type of treatment provided. RESULTS: The incidence of intraoperative anaphylaxis was 69:10.000 surgeries. The mean age of patients with anaphylaxis was 36.7 years-old and 57% were women. The most common procedures associated with anaphylaxis were the abdominal non-vascular (17.1%) and urologic (17.1%) surgeries. Skin symptoms were the most prevalent (85.7%) and all patients who presented cardiovascular shock were classified as ASA II (42.9%) or ASA III (57.1%). Epinephrine was used preferentially in anaphylaxis grade 3 (72.7%), while a few patients with anaphylaxis grades 1 and 2 took the drug (2.1% and 16.7, respectively). The most commonly etiologic drugs cited by the anesthesiologists were the neuromuscular blocking agents (22.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Our incidence of intraoperative anaphylaxis was higher than in other studies reported in the literature. These data are a warning signal to encourage measures to reduce the incidence of these severe reactions.
Aparece en las colecciones:

Comunicações em Eventos - FM/MCG
Departamento de Cirurgia - FM/MCG

Comunicações em Eventos - FM/MCM
Departamento de Clínica Médica - FM/MCM

Comunicações em Eventos - HC/ICHC
Instituto Central - HC/ICHC

Comunicações em Eventos - HC/InCor
Instituto do Coração - HC/InCor

Comunicações em Eventos - LIM/08
LIM/08 - Laboratório de Anestesiologia

Comunicações em Eventos - LIM/19
LIM/19 - Laboratório de Histocompatibilidade e Imunidade Celular

Comunicações em Eventos - LIM/60
LIM/60 - Laboratório de Imunologia Clínica e Alergia


Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.