Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/2835
Title: Excision repair cross-complementary group 1 (ERCC1) as a prognostic biomarker in patients (pts) with solid tumors: A meta-analysis on detection methods
Authors: MAK, Milena PerezTAKAHASHI, Tiago KenjiHOFF, Paulo MarceloCASTRO, GilbertoSNITCOVSKY, Igor M. L.
Citation: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, v.30, n.15, suppl.S, 2012
Abstract: Background: ERCC1 overexpression is associated with better outcomes in some cancers. The best method to assess its expression, immunohistochemistry (IHC) or polymerase chain reaction (PCR), is not established. To clarify such question, this meta-analysis was conducted. Methods: PUBMED, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were searched with terms: "ERCC1" and "IHC" and/or "PCR" and/or "mRNA". Inclusion criteria: full papers in English, solid tumor pts, ERCC1 evaluated by IHC and PCR on the same samples, reported correlation between ERCC1 expression and overall survival (OS) – the primary endpoint. As secondary endpoint, correlation between IHC and PCR expression was assessed. Exclusion criteria: review articles and no reported endpoint. Two authors reviewed and classified all papers. Pooled HR and variance were calculated by standard methods, using CMA v2.2.064 (Englewood, USA). Results: 25 articles were retrieved, with 4 included for the primary endpoint (224 pts) and 4 (191) for the secondary endpoint. All were retrospective, with diverse primary sites. Except for one, platinum chemotherapy was employed. All studies used 8F1 clone, and in 2, FL297 clone was also evaluated. ERCC1 positivity was determined by H-score in 2 studies and by AQUA in 2. mRNA ERCC1 positivity was variably defined. In general, ERCC1 overexpression was correlated with longer OS (HR 0.569, 95% CI 0.436 - 0.743, p <0.001). Similar results were found in terms of OS either by IHC or PCR (HR 0.626, 95% CI 0.46 – 0.853, p 0.003 and HR 0.434, 95% CI 0.257 – 0.730, p 0.002; respectively). No correlation between IHC and PCR overexpression was found (coefficient 0.098 p 0.444, random effect). Heterogeneity was detected only in IHC analysis, when expression was detected by both FL297 and 8F1 antibodies (p 0.001, fixed effect). Conclusions: ERCC1 overexpression is associated with better OS, regardless of employed methodology. However, protein and mRNA expression are not correlated. Major limitations to our analysis include the variety of employed ERCC1 detection methods and retrospective nature of data. Definitive conclusions on the prognostic role of ERCC1 and best methodology remain to be answered.
Appears in Collections:

Comunicações em Eventos - FM/MDR
Departamento de Radiologia - FM/MDR

Comunicações em Eventos - HC/ICESP
Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo - HC/ICESP

Comunicações em Eventos - HC/InRad
Instituto de Radiologia - HC/InRad

Comunicações em Eventos - LIM/24
LIM/24 - Laboratório de Oncologia Experimental


Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.