Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/28750
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSistema FMUSP-HC: Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP) e Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP
dc.contributor.authorMALAVOLTA, Eduardo Angeli
dc.contributor.authorASSUNÇÃO, Jorge Henrique
dc.contributor.authorGRACITELLI, Mauro Emilio Conforto
dc.contributor.authorSIMÕES, Pedro Antonio Araújo
dc.contributor.authorSHIDO, Danilo Kenji
dc.contributor.authorFERREIRA NETO, Arnaldo Amado
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-11T19:06:58Z
dc.date.available2018-10-11T19:06:58Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationREVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ORTOPEDIA, v.53, n.4, p.441-447, 2018
dc.identifier.issn1982-4378
dc.identifier.urihttps://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/28750
dc.description.abstractABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the correlation between the UCLA and Constant-Murley scores in the surgical treatment of rotator cuff tears and proximal humeral fractures (PHF). Methods: Retrospective study evaluating patients submitted to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and surgical treatment of PHF with 2-year follow-up. Patients were evaluated by the UCLA and Constant-Murley scores in the preoperative period for the rotator cuff repairs, and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery for both diagnoses. Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) was calculated to measure the degree of correlation between the two clinical scales. Results: We evaluated 109 patients: 54 with rotator cuff tear and 55 with PHF. Twenty-four months after surgical treatment, the scores according to the UCLA and Constant-Murley scores were 32.6 ± 4.0 and 85.0 ± 12.0 for the rotator cuff tears and 30.3 ± 5.3 and 73.8 ± 13.9 for the PHF, demonstrating significant improvements in both, in relation to the initial evaluation (p < 0.001). The scales demonstrated high correlation (r = 0.88, p < 0.001). The scores obtained in the two scales showed high or very high correlation in all the postoperative clinical evaluations (r = 0.79-0.91, p < 0.001). The correlation was high in the preoperative evaluation (r = 0.73, p < 0.001). Conclusion: The UCLA and Constant-Murley scores presented high or very high correlation in the evaluation of surgical treatment of rotator cuff tears and PHF. The correlation in the preoperative evaluation was high.
dc.description.abstractRESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar a correlação entre as escalas da UCLA e de Constant-Murley no tratamento cirúrgico de roturas do manguito rotador e de fraturas da extremidade proximal do úmero (FEPU). Métodos: Estudo retrospectivo, que avaliou pacientes submetidos ao reparo do manguito rotador por via artroscópica e tratamento cirúrgico de FEPU com dois anos de seguimento. Os pacientes foram avaliados pelas escalas da UCLA e de Constant-Murley no período pré-operatório nas roturas do manguito rotador e após seis, 12 e 24 meses da cirurgia em ambos os diagnósticos. O coeficiente de correlação de Pearson (r) foi calculado para medir o grau de correlação entre as duas escalas clínicas. Resultados: Avaliamos 109 pacientes, 54 com rotura do manguito rotador e 55 com FEPU. Após 24 meses do tratamento cirúrgico, as pontuações pelas escalas da UCLA e da Constant-Murley foram de 32,6 ± 4,0 e 85,0 ± 12,0 nas roturas do manguito rotador e 30,3 ± 5,3 e 73,8 ± 13,9 nas FEPU, com melhoria significativa em ambas em relação à avaliação inicial (p < 0,001). As escalas demostraram alta correlação (r = 0,88, p < 0,001). Em todas as avaliações clínicas pós-operatórias as pontuações obtidas nas duas escalas se correlacionaram de modo alto ou muito alto (r = 0,79 a 0,91, p < 0,001). No pré-operatório a correlação foi alta (r = 0,73, p < 0,001). Conclusão: As escalas da UCLA e de Constant-Murley apresentam uma correlação alta ou muito alta na avaliação do tratamento cirúrgico das roturas do manguito rotador e das FEPU. No pré-operatório a correlação é alta.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.language.isopor
dc.publisherSociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
dc.relation.ispartofRevista Brasileira de Ortopedia
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.subjectRotator cuff
dc.subjectArthroscopy
dc.subjectShoulder fractures
dc.subjectRehabilitation
dc.subjectShoulder
dc.subjectClinical scales
dc.subjectManguito rotador
dc.subjectArtroscopia
dc.subjectFraturas do ombro
dc.subjectReabilitação
dc.subjectOmbro
dc.subjectEscalas clínicas
dc.titleCorrelation between the UCLA and Constant-Murley scores in rotator cuff repairs and proximal humeral fractures osteosynthesis
dc.title.alternativeCorrelação entre as escalas da UCLA e Constant-Murley nas roturas do manguito rotador e fraturas da extremidade proximal do úmero
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.holderCopyright Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.rboe.2018.02.003
dc.identifier.pmid30027076
dc.subject.wosOrthopedics
dc.type.categoryoriginal article
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
hcfmusp.description.beginpage441
hcfmusp.description.endpage447
hcfmusp.description.issue4
hcfmusp.description.volume53
hcfmusp.origemsciELO
hcfmusp.origem.idSCIELO:S0102-36162018000400441
hcfmusp.origem.id2-s2.0-85037036385
hcfmusp.relation.referenceAllom R, 2009, J BONE JOINT SURG BR, V91B, P367, DOI 10.1302/0301-620X.91B3.20714
hcfmusp.relation.referenceAMSTUTZ HC, 1981, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P7
hcfmusp.relation.referenceAssunção JH, 2017, J Shoulder Elbow Surg, V10
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBaker P, 2008, J SHOULDER ELB SURG, V17, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.jse.2007.04.019
hcfmusp.relation.referenceCloke DJ, 2005, J SHOULDER ELB SURG, V14, P380, DOI 10.1016/j.jse.2004.08.008
hcfmusp.relation.referenceCole BJ, 2007, J SHOULDER ELB SURG, V16, P579, DOI 10.1016/j.jse.2006.12.011
hcfmusp.relation.referenceConstant CR, 2008, J SHOULDER ELB SURG, V17, P355, DOI 10.1016/j.jse.2007.06.022
hcfmusp.relation.referenceCONSTANT CR, 1987, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P160
hcfmusp.relation.referenceCook KF, 2002, J ORTHOP SPORT PHYS, V32, P336, DOI 10.2519/jospt.2002.32.7.336
hcfmusp.relation.referenceCunningham G, 2015, ARTHROSCOPY, V31, P1688, DOI 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.03.010
hcfmusp.relation.referenceELLMAN H, 1986, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V68A, P1136, DOI 10.2106/00004623-198668080-00002
hcfmusp.relation.referenceELLMAN H, 1991, J BONE JOINT SURG BR, V73, P395
hcfmusp.relation.referenceFuchs B, 1999, J SHOULDER ELB SURG, V8, P599, DOI 10.1016/S1058-2746(99)90097-6
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGilbart MK, 2007, J SHOULDER ELB SURG, V16, P717, DOI 10.1016/j.jse.2007.02.123
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHarreld K, 2013, ORTHOPEDICS, V36, P808, DOI 10.3928/01477447-20130523-29
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHarvie P, 2005, J BONE JOINT SURG BR, V87B, P151, DOI 10.1302/0301-620X.87B2.15305
hcfmusp.relation.referenceJohansson KM, 2005, J SHOULDER ELB SURG, V14, P273, DOI 10.1016/j.jse.2004.08.001
hcfmusp.relation.referenceKirkley A, 2003, ARTHROSCOPY, V19, P1109, DOI 10.1016/j.arthro.2003.10.030
hcfmusp.relation.referenceKoh KH, 2011, ARTHROSCOPY, V27, P453, DOI 10.1016/j.arthro.2010.11.059
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMalavolta EA, 2014, AM J SPORT MED, V42, P2446, DOI 10.1177/0363546514541777
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMcCormick F, 2014, INT J SHOULDER SURG, V8, P15, DOI 10.4103/0973-6042.131850
hcfmusp.relation.referencePanella A, 2016, ARCH ORTHOP TRAUM SU, V136, P1507, DOI 10.1007/s00402-016-2558-x
hcfmusp.relation.referencePuga VOO, 2012, Rev Bras Fisioter, V16
hcfmusp.relation.referenceRocourt MHH, 2008, J SHOULDER ELB SURG, V17, P364, DOI 10.1016/j.jse.2007.06.024
hcfmusp.relation.referenceRomeo AA, 2004, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P107, DOI 10.1097/01.blo.0000142624.05526.dd
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSkutek M, 2000, ARCH ORTHOP TRAUM SU, V120, P432, DOI 10.1007/s004020000133
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSlobogean GP, 2011, INJURY, V42, P248, DOI 10.1016/j.injury.2010.11.046
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSmith AM, 2006, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V88A, P508, DOI 10.2106/JBJS.E.00132
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSproul RC, 2011, INJURY, V42, P408, DOI 10.1016/j.injury.2010.11.058
hcfmusp.relation.referenceThanasas C, 2009, J SHOULDER ELB SURG, V18, P837, DOI 10.1016/j.jse.2009.06.004
hcfmusp.relation.referencevan de Water ATM, 2014, DISABIL REHABIL, V36, P1072, DOI 10.3109/09638288.2013.829529
hcfmusp.relation.referenceWilliams GN, 1999, AM J SPORT MED, V27, P214, DOI 10.1177/03635465990270021701
dc.description.indexSciELO
hcfmusp.citation.scopus7-
hcfmusp.scopus.lastupdate2022-06-17-
Appears in Collections:

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/IOT
Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia - HC/IOT

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/41
LIM/41 - Laboratório de Investigação Médica do Sistema Músculoesquelético


Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
art_MALAVOLTA_Correlation_between_the_UCLA_and_ConstantMurley_scores_in_2018_por.PDFpublishedVersion (Portuguese)947.97 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
art_MALAVOLTA_Correlation_between_the_UCLA_and_ConstantMurley_scores_in_2018_eng.PDFpublishedVersion (English)908.15 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.