Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSistema FMUSP-HC: Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP) e Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP-
dc.contributor.authorKHO, Rosanne M.-
dc.contributor.authorANDRES, Marina Paula-
dc.contributor.authorBORRELLI, Giuliano Moyses-
dc.contributor.authorNETO, Joao Siufi-
dc.contributor.authorZANLUCHI, Alan-
dc.contributor.authorABRAO, Mauricio Simes-
dc.identifier.citationBEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, v.51, p.102-110, 2018-
dc.description.abstractTreatment options for patients with different types of endometriosis - superficial, ovarian, or deep vary depending on the clinical presentation. New findings in the recent years regarding the role of preoperative imaging, efficacy of medical therapy, and effect of surgery on ovarian reserve have changed the way we understand the disease and subsequently the way we treat our patients. Practicing clinicians frequently refer to published recommendations from major societies for treatment guidelines. This paper aims to present and compare the varying major society guidelines on the indications and best surgical treatment approach for the management of the different types of endometriosis. We also present our preferred surgical treatment algorithm given the evidence in the literature and our cumulative 30-year clinical experience in a large tertiary referral center. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier Ltd.-
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCI LTD-
dc.relation.ispartofBest Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology-
dc.subjectSuperficial endometriosis-
dc.subjectOvarian endometrioma-
dc.subjectDeep endometriosis-
dc.subjectSurgical treatment-
dc.subject.otherovarian endometriosis-
dc.subject.otherdeep endometriosis-
dc.subject.othermild endometriosis-
dc.titleSurgical treatment of different types of endometriosis: Comparison of major society guidelines and preferred clinical algorithms-
dc.rights.holderCopyright ELSEVIER SCI LTD-
dc.subject.wosObstetrics & Gynecology-
dc.type.categoryoriginal article-
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion-, Rosanne M.:Cleveland Clin, Womens Hlth Inst, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceAbbott J, 2004, FERTIL STERIL, V82, P878, DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.03.046-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceAbrao MS, 2007, HUM REPROD, V22, P3092, DOI 10.1093/humrep/dem187-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceAbrao MS, 2008, J MINIM INVAS GYN, V15, P280, DOI 10.1016/j.jmig.2008.01.006-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceAndres MD, 2017, MINERVA GINECOL, V69, P587, DOI 10.23736/S0026-4784.17.04082-5-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBerlanda N, 2017, EUR J OBSTET GYN R B, V209, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.07.513-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceCarmona F, 2011, FERTIL STERIL, V96, P251, DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.04.068-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceChaaabouni S, 2009, PATHOLOGICA, V101, P130-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceChapron C, 2009, FERTIL STERIL, V92, P453, DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.06.003-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGoncalves MOD, 2010, HUM REPROD, V25, P665, DOI 10.1093/humrep/dep433-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceDunselman GAJ, 2014, HUM REPROD, V29, P400, DOI 10.1093/humrep/det457-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceEskenazi B, 1997, OBSTET GYN CLIN N AM, V24, P235, DOI 10.1016/S0889-8545(05)70302-8-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceFalcone T, 2010, OBSTET GYNECOL, V116, P440, DOI [10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181e8b073, 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181ea4fb6]-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGoodman LR, 2016, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V215, DOI 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.05.029-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHart RJ, 2008, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, V16-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceLeyland N, 2010, J OBSTET GYNAECOL CA, V32, pS1, DOI 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34589-3-
hcfmusp.relation.referencede la Torre MAL, 2017, J MINIM INVAS GYN, V24, P203, DOI 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.11.009-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceLouis GMB, 2011, FERTIL STERIL, V96, P360, DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.05.087-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMaggiore ULR, 2017, EUR UROL, V71, P790, DOI 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.12.015-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMarcoux S, 1997, NEW ENGL J MED, V337, P217, DOI 10.1056/NEJM199707243370401-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMissmer SA, 2004, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V160, P784, DOI 10.1093/aje/kwh275-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceNisolle M, 1997, FERTIL STERIL, V68, P585, DOI 10.1016/S0015-0282(97)00191-X-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceOpoien HK, 2011, REPROD BIOMED ONLINE, V23, P389, DOI 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.06.002-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMota ILP, 2015, JSLS-J SOC LAPAROEND, V19, DOI 10.4293/JSLS.2015.00028-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceParazzini F, 1999, HUM REPROD, V14, P1332-
hcfmusp.relation.referencePodgaec S, 2014, FEDERACAO BRASILEIRA, V1, P1-
hcfmusp.relation.referencePractice Comm Amer Soc Reprod Med, 2012, FERTIL STERIL, V98, P591, DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.05.031-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceRemorgida V, 2007, OBSTET GYNECOL SURV, V62, P461, DOI 10.1097/01.ogx.0000268688.55653.5c-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceRuffo G, 2012, SURG ENDOSC, V26, P1035, DOI 10.1007/s00464-011-1991-8-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSalihoglu KN, 2016, J MINIM INVAS GYN, V23, P719, DOI 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.02.018-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSoliman AM, 2016, HUM REPROD, V31, P712, DOI 10.1093/humrep/dev335-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSUTTON CJG, 1994, FERTIL STERIL, V62, P696-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceVigano P, 2004, BEST PRACT RES CL OB, V18, P177, DOI 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2004.01.007-
Appears in Collections:

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MOG
Departamento de Obstetrícia e Ginecologia - FM/MOG

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/ICHC
Instituto Central - HC/ICHC

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/58
LIM/58 - Laboratório de Ginecologia Estrutural e Molecular

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
  Restricted Access
publishedVersion (English)676.35 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.