Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/31963
Title: Patient Preferences for Coronary CT Angiography with Stress Perfusion, SPECT, or Invasive Coronary Angiography
Authors: MINHAS, AnumDEWEY, MarcVAVERE, Andrea L.TANAMI, YutakaOSTOVANEH, Mohammad R.LAULE, MichaelROCHITTE, Carlos E.NIINUMA, HiroyukiKOFOED, Klaus F.GELEIJNS, JacobHOE, JohnCHEN, Marcus Y.KITAGAWA, KakuyaNOMURA, CesarCLOUSE, Melvin E.RYBICKI, Frank J.TAN, Swee YawPAUL, NarinderMATHESON, MatthewCOX, ChristopherRIEF, MatthiasMAIER, PiaFEGER, SarahPLOTKIN, MichailSCHOENENBERGER, Eva
Citation: RADIOLOGY, v.291, n.2, p.339-347, 2019
Abstract: Background: Patient preference is pivotal for widespread adoption of tests in clinical practice. Patient preferences for invasive versus other noninvasive tests for coronary artery disease are not known. Purpose: To compare patient acceptance and preferences for noninvasive and invasive cardiac imaging in North and South America, Asia, and Europe. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective 16-center trial in 381 study participants undergoing coronary CT angiography with stress perfusion, SPECT, and invasive coronary angiography (ICA). Patient preferences were collected by using a previously validated questionnaire translated into eight languages. Responses were converted to ordinal scales and were modeled with generalized linear mixed models. Results: In patients in whom at least one test was associated with pain, CT and SPECT showed reduced median pain levels, reported on 0-100 visual analog scales, from 20 for ICA (interquartile range [IQR], 4-50) to 6 for CT (IQR, 0-27.5) and 5 for SPECT (IQR, 0-25) (P < .001). Patients from Asia reported significantly more pain than patients from other continents for ICA (median, 25; IQR, 10-50; P = .01), CT (median, 10; IQR, 0-30; P = .02), and SPECT (median, 7; IQR, 0-28; P = .03). Satisfaction with preparation differed by continent and test (P = .01), with patients from Asia reporting generally lower ratings. Patients from North America had greater percentages of ""very high"" or ""high"" satisfaction than patients from other continents for ICA (96% vs 82%, respectively; P < .001) and SPECT (95% vs 79%, respectively; P = .04) but not for CT (89% vs 86%, respectively; P = .70). Among all patients, CT was preferred by 54% of patients, compared with 18% for SPECT and 28% for ICA (P < .001). Conclusion: For cardiac imaging, patients generally favored CT angiography with stress perfusion, while study participants from Asia generally reported lowest satisfaction. (c) RSNA, 2019
Appears in Collections:

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/InCor
Instituto do Coração - HC/InCor

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/64
LIM/64 - Laboratório de Investigação Médica em Biologia Cardiovascular Translacional

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - ODS/03
ODS/03 - Saúde e bem-estar


Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
art_MINHAS_Patient_Preferences_for_Coronary_CT_Angiography_with_Stress_2019.PDF
  Restricted Access
publishedVersion (English)1.57 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.