Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/31985
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSistema FMUSP-HC: Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP) e Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP
dc.contributor.authorBATISTA, Rafael L.
dc.contributor.authorMUSOLINO, Nina R. C.
dc.contributor.authorCESCATO, Valter A. S.
dc.contributor.authorSILVA, Gilberto O. da
dc.contributor.authorMEDEIROS, Raphael S. S.
dc.contributor.authorHERKENHOFF, Clarissa G. B.
dc.contributor.authorTRARBACH, Ericka B.
dc.contributor.authorCUNHA-NETO, Malebranche B.
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-30T13:48:02Z
dc.date.available2019-05-30T13:48:02Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationAMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, v.42, n.2, p.221-227, 2019
dc.identifier.issn0277-3732
dc.identifier.urihttps://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/31985
dc.description.abstractBackground: Complete tumor removal by transsphenoidal surgery is usually difficult for large nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs). A validated medical treatment may be useful for their management. This study evaluates the clinical efficacy of the dopaminergic agonist cabergoline for residual NFPA. Design, Setting, and Participants: We conducted a randomized, parallel, open-label clinical trial that compared cabergoline with nonintervention in patients with residual NFPA after transsphenoidal surgery over 2 years. The primary outcome was clinical efficacy (tumor reduction). The secondary outcome was the relationship between tumor dopamine D2 receptor (D2R) expression and clinical responsiveness. Tumor measurements and clinical evaluations were performed every 6 months. Results: In total, 59 and 57 individuals were randomly assigned to the study and control groups, respectively. At the end of the study, residual tumor shrinkage, stabilization, and enlargement were observed in 28.8%, 66.1%, and 5.1% of patients, respectively, in the medical-therapy group and in 10.5%, 73.7%, and 15.8% of patients, respectively, in the control group (P=0.01). The progression-free survival rate was 23.2 and 20.8 months for the study and control groups, respectively (P=0.01). D2R was not associated with cabergoline responsiveness. No major side effects were related to cabergoline use. Conclusions: Cabergoline was an effective drug for treating residual NFPA, and its use was associated with a high rate of tumor shrinkage ( NCT03271918).eng
dc.description.sponsorshipFundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo-FAPESP [2014/16327-1]
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherLIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINSeng
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials
dc.rightsrestrictedAccesseng
dc.subjectnonfunctioning adenomaeng
dc.subjectcabergolineeng
dc.subjectD2R expressioneng
dc.subject.otherreceptor expressioneng
dc.subject.othermedical therapyeng
dc.subject.otherdopamine 2eng
dc.subject.otherradiotherapyeng
dc.subject.otherdiagnosiseng
dc.subject.othermortalityeng
dc.subject.otherdiseaseeng
dc.titleCabergoline in the Management of Residual Nonfunctioning Pituitary Adenoma A Single-Center, Open-Label, 2-Year Randomized Clinical Trialeng
dc.typearticleeng
dc.rights.holderCopyright LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINSeng
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/COC.0000000000000505
dc.identifier.pmid30540568
dc.subject.wosOncologyeng
dc.type.categoryoriginal articleeng
dc.type.versionpublishedVersioneng
hcfmusp.description.beginpage221
hcfmusp.description.endpage227
hcfmusp.description.issue2
hcfmusp.description.volume42
hcfmusp.origemWOS
hcfmusp.origem.idWOS:000465420000019
hcfmusp.origem.id2-s2.0-85060373250
hcfmusp.publisher.cityPHILADELPHIAeng
hcfmusp.publisher.countryUSAeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceAyuk J, 2009, PITUITARY, V12, P35, DOI 10.1007/s11102-007-0083-1eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBorba CG, 2015, CASE REP ONCOL MED, DOI 10.1155/2015/810367eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBulwer C, 2017, CLIN ENDOCRINOL, V86, P862, DOI 10.1111/cen.13339eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceCastinetti F, 2015, ANN ENDOCRINOL-PARIS, V76, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.ando.2015.04.007eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceChanson P, 2015, ANN ENDOCRINOL-PARIS, V76, P239, DOI 10.1016/j.ando.2015.04.002eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceColao A, 2008, ENDOCR-RELAT CANCER, V15, P905, DOI 10.1677/ERC-08-0181eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceDelpont B, 2017, MOVEMENT DISORD, V32, P1566, DOI 10.1002/mds.27101eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceDICHIRO G, 1962, AMER J ROENTGENOL RA, V87, P989eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGabalec F, 2015, PHYSIOL RES, V64, P369eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGabalec F, 2012, PITUITARY, V15, P222, DOI 10.1007/s11102-011-0316-1eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGagliano T, 2013, PITUITARY, V16, P91, DOI 10.1007/s11102-012-0380-1eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGarcia EC, 2013, PITUITARY, V16, P189, DOI 10.1007/s11102-012-0403-yeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGreenman Y, 2016, EUR J ENDOCRINOL, V175, P63, DOI 10.1530/EJE-16-0206eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGreenman Y, 2017, EUR J ENDOCRINOL, V177, pR113, DOI 10.1530/EJE-17-0216eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGreenman Y, 2015, ENDOCRINE, V50, P51, DOI 10.1007/s12020-015-0685-8eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHalperin I, 2012, CLIN ENDOCRINOL, V77, P275, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2012.04349.xeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceIoachimescu AG, 2012, NEUROSURGERY, V71, P296, DOI 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318257c1f0eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceKim MY, 2016, RADIAT ONCOL J, V34, P121, DOI 10.3857/roj.2016.01683eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceLUNDIN P, 1992, J COMPUT ASSIST TOMO, V16, P519, DOI 10.1097/00004728-199207000-00004eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMano T, 2017, CLIN NEUROPHARMACOL, V40, P219, DOI 10.1097/WNF.0000000000000243eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMercado M, 2017, ENDOCRINOL DIAB NUTR, V64, P384, DOI 10.1016/j.endinu.2017.05.009eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMinniti G, 2016, REP PRACT ONCOL RADI, V21, P370, DOI 10.1016/j.rpor.2014.09.004eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMolitch ME, 2017, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V317, P516, DOI 10.1001/jama.2016.19699eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceNeto LV, 2015, CLIN ENDOCRINOL, V82, P739, DOI 10.1111/cen.12684eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceNishioka H, 2015, ENDOCR PATHOL, V26, P349, DOI 10.1007/s12022-015-9398-zeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceOlsson DS, 2015, J CLIN ENDOCR METAB, V100, P2651, DOI 10.1210/jc.2015-1475eng
hcfmusp.relation.referencePerez-Esparza R, 2017, J NEUROPSYCH CLIN N, V29, P295, DOI 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.16110313eng
hcfmusp.relation.referencePivonello R, 2004, J CLIN ENDOCR METAB, V89, P1674, DOI 10.1210/jc.2003-030859eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceRogers A, 2014, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V349, DOI 10.1136/bmj.g5390eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSebastian P, 2016, REP PRACT ONCOL RADI, V21, P466, DOI 10.1016/j.rpor.2016.06.002eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSerra C, 2016, NEUROSURG FOCUS, V40, DOI 10.3171/2015.12.FOCUS15564eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceVoon V, 2009, LANCET NEUROL, V8, P1140, DOI 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70287-Xeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceVroonen L, 2017, ENDOCRINE, V55, P248, DOI 10.1007/s12020-016-1120-5eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceWang SS, 2016, ARCH MED SCI, V12, P576, DOI 10.5114/aoms.2016.59932eng
dc.description.indexMEDLINEeng
dc.identifier.eissn1537-453X
hcfmusp.citation.scopus42-
hcfmusp.scopus.lastupdate2024-03-29-
Appears in Collections:

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/ICESP
Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo - HC/ICESP

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/ICHC
Instituto Central - HC/ICHC

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/IPq
Instituto de Psiquiatria - HC/IPq

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/25
LIM/25 - Laboratório de Endocrinologia Celular e Molecular

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - ODS/03
ODS/03 - Saúde e bem-estar


Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
art_BATISTA_Cabergoline_in_the_Management_of_Residual_Nonfunctioning_Pituitary_2019.PDF
  Restricted Access
publishedVersion (English)233.95 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.