Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/32013
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSistema FMUSP-HC: Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP) e Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP-
dc.contributor.authorOLIVEIRA, Dayan Carvalho Ramos Salles de-
dc.contributor.authorSOUZA, Amanda de Moura-
dc.contributor.authorLEVY, Renata Bertazzi-
dc.contributor.authorSICHIERI, Rosely-
dc.contributor.authorVERLY-JR, Eliseu-
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-30T13:52:17Z-
dc.date.available2019-05-30T13:52:17Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationPUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION, v.22, n.5, p.841-847, 2019-
dc.identifier.issn1368-9800-
dc.identifier.urihttps://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/32013-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to compare Household Budget Survey (HBS) data on food purchasing and individual food consumption, collected in the same nationwide survey. DESIGN: Food purchase information for each household was collected by a seven-day collective acquisition diary, applied to 55 970 households. Food consumption information was obtained from household members over 10 years old by the application of two non-consecutive food records in a sub-sample of the HBS. Cooking and correction factors were applied when necessary, and all food items reported were grouped into twelve main food groups. Food purchase and consumption data were presented as absolute weight (g/person per d) and as relative contribution to energy intake (%) for the overall study population, which was stratified according to household income. SETTING: Brazil.ParticipantsNational estimates of food consumption and purchase for Brazil. RESULTS: The greatest differences between purchase and consumption data (purchase minus consumption) were observed for meat (-168 g), beans/legumes (-48 g), roots/tubers (-36 g) and fruits (-31 g). When expressed in terms of energy contribution, the highest differences were found for cereals (13 %) and oils and fats (11 %). Differences between purchase and consumption data were generally lower in the highest compared with the lowest household income quintile; and were lower for most main food groups when considering only foods reported as being eaten at home. CONCLUSIONS: With few exceptions, food purchase expressed as relative energy contribution, as opposed to absolute weight, can provide a good picture of actual consumption in the Brazilian populationeng
dc.description.sponsorshipCoordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior - Brasil (CAPES) [1701627]-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherCAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESSeng
dc.relation.ispartofPublic Health Nutrition-
dc.rightsrestrictedAccesseng
dc.subjectHousehold dataeng
dc.subjectDietary assessmenteng
dc.subjectFood consumptioneng
dc.subjectFood away from homeeng
dc.subjectSurveyseng
dc.subject.otherexpenditures surveys hceseng
dc.subject.othernationally representative sampleeng
dc.subject.otherenergy-intakeeng
dc.subject.otheravailabilityeng
dc.subject.otherrecallseng
dc.subject.otherrecordseng
dc.subject.othertrendseng
dc.titleComparison between household food purchase and individual food consumption in Brazileng
dc.typearticleeng
dc.rights.holderCopyright CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESSeng
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S1368980018002987-
dc.subject.wosPublic, Environmental & Occupational Healtheng
dc.subject.wosNutrition & Dieteticseng
dc.type.categoryoriginal articleeng
dc.type.versionpublishedVersioneng
hcfmusp.author.externalOLIVEIRA, Dayan Carvalho Ramos Salles de:Rio de Janeiro State Univ UERJ, Inst Social Med, Sao Francisco Xavier 524 UERJ, BR-20550013 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil-
hcfmusp.author.externalSOUZA, Amanda de Moura:Fed Univ Rio de Janeiro UFRJ, Inst Studies Collect Hlth, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil-
hcfmusp.author.externalSICHIERI, Rosely:Rio de Janeiro State Univ UERJ, Inst Social Med, Sao Francisco Xavier 524 UERJ, BR-20550013 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil-
hcfmusp.author.externalVERLY-JR, Eliseu:Rio de Janeiro State Univ UERJ, Inst Social Med, Sao Francisco Xavier 524 UERJ, BR-20550013 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil-
hcfmusp.description.beginpage841-
hcfmusp.description.endpage847-
hcfmusp.description.issue5-
hcfmusp.description.volume22-
hcfmusp.origemWOS-
hcfmusp.origem.idWOS:000462870200008-
hcfmusp.origem.id2-s2.0-85058186907-
hcfmusp.publisher.cityCAMBRIDGEeng
hcfmusp.publisher.countryENGLANDeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceAntonic-Degac Katica, 2010, Acta Med Croatica, V64, P17eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBermudez OI, 2012, FOOD NUTR BULL, V33, pS208, DOI 10.1177/15648265120333S209eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBezerra Ilana Nogueira, 2013, Rev. Saúde Pública, V47, p200s, DOI 10.1590/S0034-89102013000700006eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBezerra IN, 2013, BRIT J NUTR, V109, P1276, DOI 10.1017/S0007114512003169eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBlanco-Metzler A, 2017, NUTRIENTS, V9, DOI 10.3390/nu9091020eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBognar A, 2002, TABLES WEIGHT YIELDeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBorlizzi A, 2017, FOOD POLICY, V72, P20, DOI 10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.08.009eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceClaro RM, 2010, CAD SAUDE PUBLICA, V26, P2168, DOI 10.1590/S0102-311X2010001100018eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceLouzada MLD, 2017, FOOD POLICY, V72, P112, DOI 10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.08.017eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceFiedler JL, 2012, FOOD NUTR BULL, V33, pS170, DOI 10.1177/15648265120333S205eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGibson RS, 2005, PRINCIPLES NUTR ASSE, P129eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceValencia-Valero RG, 2014, SALUD PUBLICA MEXICO, V56, P154eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceInstituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatistica, 1999, EST NAC DESP FAM ENDeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceInstituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatistica, 2010, PESQ ORC FAM 2008 20eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceInstituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatistica, 2011, PESQ ORC FAM 2008 20eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceKaara J, 2008, DERIVING FOOD SECURI, P69eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceLevy RB, 2012, REV SAUDE PUBL, V46, P6, DOI 10.1590/s0034-89102011005000088eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceLevy-Costa RB, 2005, REV SAUDE PUBL, V39, P530, DOI 10.1590/s0034-89102005000400003eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceLopes TS, 2016, EUR J CLIN NUTR, V70, P1259, DOI 10.1038/ejcn.2016.85eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMartirisova D, 2008, DERIVING FOOD SECURI, P59eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMONDINI L, 1994, REV SAUDE PUBL, V28, P433, DOI 10.1590/S0034-89101994000600007eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMonteiro CA, 2000, REV SAUDE PUBL, V34, P251, DOI 10.1590/S0034-89102000000300007eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMoubarac JC, 2014, CAN J DIET PRACT RES, V75, P15, DOI 10.3148/75.1.2014.15eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMurphy S, 2012, FOOD NUTR BULL, V33, pS235, DOI 10.1177/15648265120333S213eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceNeufeld LM, 2012, ENCY HUMAN NUTR, P289eng
hcfmusp.relation.referencePereira C, 2008, DERIVING FOOD SECURI, P81eng
hcfmusp.relation.referencePerez-Cueto FJA, 2006, BRIT J NUTR, V95, P555, DOI 10.1079/BJN20051661eng
hcfmusp.relation.referencePinheiro ABV, 2009, TABELA AVALIACAO CON, P117eng
hcfmusp.relation.referencePrentice RL, 2011, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V174, P591, DOI 10.1093/aje/kwr140eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSantos DM, 2014, J NUTR HEALTH AGING, V18, P471, DOI 10.1007/s12603-014-0013-7eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSekula W, 2005, PUBLIC HEALTH NUTR, V8, P430, DOI 10.1079/PHN2004695eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceWorld Cancer Research Fund & American Institute for Cancer Research, 2007, DIET NUTR PHYS ACT Ceng
dc.description.indexMEDLINEeng
dc.identifier.eissn1475-2727-
hcfmusp.citation.scopus8-
hcfmusp.scopus.lastupdate2022-06-10-
Appears in Collections:

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/38
LIM/38 - Laboratório de Epidemiologia e Imunobiologia


Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
art_OLIVEIRA_Comparison_between_household_food_purchase_and_individual_food_2019.PDF
  Restricted Access
267.61 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.