Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSistema FMUSP-HC: Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP) e Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP
dc.contributor.authorBALEN, Sheila Andreoli
dc.contributor.authorMOORE, David R.
dc.contributor.authorSAMESHIMA, Koichi
dc.identifier.citationJOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY, v.30, n.1, p.6-15, 2019
dc.description.abstractBackground: Pitch pattern sequence (PPS) and duration pattern sequence (DPS) tests are frequently used in the assessment of auditory processing disorder. Current recommendations suggest alternate, interchangeable modes for responding to stimuli. Purpose: The objective of the study is to evaluate the influence of response mode (i.e., humming, pointing, and labeling) and age on PPS and DPS performance of 7- to 11-year-old children. Research Design: Laboratory-based testing of school children. Cross-sectional comparison of age, with repeated measures of age, test, ear, and response mode. Study Sample: From 452 children recruited, 228 right-handed children (109 girls) aged 7 years to 11 years 11 months (mean age 9 years 4 months) completed at least one test (PPS: 211, DPS: 198), and 181 children completed both tests. Audiology inclusion criteria include normal hearing thresholds (<= 15 dB HL at octave frequencies 250-8000 Hz); word recognition in quiet >= 92%; tympanogram peak compensated static acoustic compliance 0.4-1.6 mmhos; and tympanometric peak pressure -100 to + 50 daPa, all in both ears. Other inclusion criteria were Portuguese as first language; right handed; no musical training; no related, known, or observed phonological, learning, neurologic, psychiatric, or behavioral disorder; otologic history; and delayed neuropsychomotor or language development. Data Collection and Analysis: PPS: 30 trials per ear and response condition of three consecutive 500 msec duration intermixed high (1430 Hz) or low (880 Hz) frequency tones presented monaurally at 50 dB HL. The first response condition was humming followed by labeling (naming: high or low). DPS: As per PPS except 1000 Hz tones of intermixed 500 (long) and 250 msec (short) duration. First response was pointing (at a symbolic object) followed by labeling. Trends across age and between tests were assessed using repeated measures generalized linear mixed models. Correlation coefficients were calculated to assess relations among test scores. The two-sided significance level was 0.05. Results: Older children performed better than younger children in all tasks. Humming the tone pattern (PPS humming) produced generally better performance than either articulating the attributes of the tones (labeling) or pointing to objects representing tone duration. PPS humming produced ceiling performance for many children of all ages. For both labeling tasks and DPS pointing, performance was better on the PPS than on the DPS, for stimulation of the right than the left ear, and in boys than girls. Individual performance on the two tasks was highly correlated. Conclusions: Response mode does matter in the PPS and DPS. Results from humming should not be combined with or be a substitute for results obtained from a labeling response. Tasks that rely on labeling a tonal stimulus should be avoided in testing hearing in children or other special populations.eng
dc.publisherAMER ACAD AUDIOLOGYeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of the American Academy of Audiology
dc.subjectauditory processing disordereng
dc.subjectduration pattern testeng
dc.subjectpitch pattern testeng
dc.titlePitch and Duration Pattern Sequence Tests in 7-to 11-Year-Old Children: Results Depend on Response Modeeng
dc.rights.holderCopyright AMER ACAD AUDIOLOGYeng
dc.subject.wosAudiology & Speech-Language Pathologyeng
dc.type.categoryoriginal articleeng
dc.type.versionpublishedVersioneng, Sheila Andreoli:Fed Univ, Dept Speech Language & Hearing, BR-59015110 Natal, RN, Brazil, David R.:Univ Cincinnati, Cincinnati Childrens Hosp Med Ctr, Coll Med, Commun Sci Res Ctr, Cincinnati, OH 45229 USA; Univ Cincinnati, Coll Med, Dept Otolaryngol, Cincinnati, OH 45229 USA
hcfmusp.relation.referenceAAA - American Academy of Audiology, 2010, CLIN PRACT GUID DIAGeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceAmerican Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA), 2005, CENTR AUD PROC DIS Reng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBregman A. S., 1990, AUDITORY SCENE ANALeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceCameron S, 2007, EAR HEARING, V28, P196, DOI 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318031267feng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceCameron S, 2016, J AM ACAD AUDIOL, V27, P458, DOI 10.3766/jaaa.15084eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceChermak GD, 2017, INT J AUDIOL, V56, P499, DOI 10.1080/14992027.2017.1284351eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceDillon H, 2014, J AM ACAD AUDIOL, V25, P699eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceEmanuel DC, 2011, AM J AUDIOL, V20, P48, DOI 10.1044/1059-0889(2011/10-0019)eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceFerguson MA, 2011, J SPEECH LANG HEAR R, V54, P211, DOI 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0167)eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGrube M, 2012, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V279, P4496, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2012.1817eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHuyck JJ, 2011, DEVELOPMENTAL SCI, V14, P614, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.01009.xeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceKraus N, 2010, NAT REV NEUROSCI, V11, P599, DOI 10.1038/nrn2882eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMcDermott EE, 2016, J AM ACAD AUDIOL, V27, P72, DOI 10.3766/jaaa.14050eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMoore DR, 2018, J AM ACAD AUDIOL, V29, P364, DOI 10.3766/jaaa.16130eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMoore DR, 2012, J COMMUN DISORD, V45, P411, DOI 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2012.06.006eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMoore DR, 2010, PEDIATRICS, V126, pE382, DOI 10.1542/peds.2009-2826eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMusiek F E, 1994, J Am Acad Audiol, V5, P265eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMusiek F. E., 1994, NEUROAUDIOLOGY CASEeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMUSIEK FE, 1990, AUDIOLOGY, V29, P304eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMUSIEK FE, 1987, AUDIOLOGY, V26, P79eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMusiek FE, 2002, HEARING J, V55, P58, DOI 10.1097/01.HJ.0000293280.99394.DDeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMusiek FE, 2011, J AM ACAD AUDIOL, V22, P342, DOI 10.3766/jaaa.22.6.4eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceRusso ICAP, 2011, PRCITICA AUDIOLOGIAeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSanes DH, 2011, NEURON, V72, P912, DOI 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.12.005eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceShinn J.B., 2003, HEAR J, V56, P52eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSkoe E, 2015, J COGNITIVE NEUROSCI, V27, P124, DOI 10.1162/jocn_a_00691eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceTomlin D, 2015, EAR HEARING, V36, P527, DOI 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000172eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceTomlin D, 2014, J AM ACAD AUDIOL, V25, P541, DOI 10.3766/jaaa.25.6.4eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceWalker KMM, 2006, BRAIN RES, V1124, P126, DOI 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.09.080eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceWerner LA, 2007, J COMMUN DISORD, V40, P275, DOI 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2007.03.004eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceWilleford JA, 1985, ASSESSMENT CENTRAL Aeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceZhang Y, 2005, NEUROIMAGE, V26, P703, DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.040eng
hcfmusp.relation.reference2011, EAR HEARING, V32, P269, DOI 10.1097/AUD.0B013E318201C468eng
hcfmusp.relation.reference1997, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, V34, P534eng
hcfmusp.relation.reference2015, J AM ACAD AUDIOL, V26, P652, DOI 10.3766/JAAA.14108eng
hcfmusp.relation.reference2006, J ACOUST SOC AM, V119, P1616, DOI 10.1121/1.2164988eng
Appears in Collections:

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MDR
Departamento de Radiologia - FM/MDR

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/43
LIM/43 - Laboratório de Medicina Nuclear

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
  Restricted Access
publishedVersion (English)545.33 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.