Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSistema FMUSP-HC: Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP) e Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP
dc.contributor.authorVASCONCELOS, Luciana Pereira de
dc.contributor.authorRODRIGUES, Luiza de Oliveira
dc.contributor.authorNOBRE, Moacyr Roberto Cuce
dc.identifier.citationINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH GOVERNANCE, v.24, n.3, p.230-238, 2019
dc.description.abstractPurpose Good medical practice, evidence-based medicine (EBM) and clinical practice guidelines (CPG) have been recurring subjects in the scientific literature. EBM advocates argue that good medical practice should be guided by evidence-based CPG. On the other hand, critical authors of EBM methodology argue that various interests undermine the quality of evidence and reliability of CPG recommendations. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate patient related outcomes of CPG implementation, in light of EBM critics. Design/methodology/approach The authors opted for a rapid literature review. Findings There are few studies evaluating the effectiveness of CPG in patient-related outcomes. The systematic reviews found are not conclusive, although they suggest a positive impact of CPGs in relevant outcomes. Originality/value The paper is the first of its kind to discuss, based on the published literature, next steps toward better health practice, while acknowledging the caveats of this process.eng
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Health Governance
dc.subjectEvidence-based practiceeng
dc.subjectHealth care qualityeng
dc.titleClinical guidelines and patient related outcomes: summary of evidence and recommendationseng
dc.rights.holderCopyright EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTDeng
dc.subject.wosHealth Policy & Serviceseng
dc.type.versionpublishedVersioneng, Luiza de Oliveira:Hosp Unimed Belo Horizonte, Unidade Betim, Betim, Brazil
hcfmusp.relation.referenceAbdullah G, 2014, WORLDV EVID-BASED NU, V11, P284, DOI 10.1111/wvn.12060eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceAllen Davina, 2009, JBI Libr Syst Rev, V7, P80eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceAnderson ML, 2016, JAMA CARDIOL, V1, P37, DOI 10.1001/jamacardio.2015.0275eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceArmstrong JJ, 2017, J CLIN EPIDEMIOL, V81, P13, DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.08.005eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceAtkins L, 2017, IMPLEMENT SCI, V12, DOI 10.1186/s13012-017-0605-9eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBahtsevani C, 2004, INT J TECHNOL ASSESS, V20, P427, DOI 10.1017/S026646230400131Xeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceCasajuana Brunet J., 2003, SEMERGEN MED FAMILIA, V29, P240, DOI [10.1016/S1138-3593(03)74186-0, DOI 10.1016/S1138-3593(03)74186-0]eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceEmparanza JI, 2015, J EVAL CLIN PRACT, V21, P1059, DOI 10.1111/jep.12460eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGirlanda F, 2017, BRIT J PSYCHIAT, V210, P24, DOI 10.1192/bjp.bp.115.179093eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGreenhalgh T, 2014, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V348, DOI 10.1136/bmj.g3725eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGRIMSHAW JM, 1993, LANCET, V342, P1317, DOI 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92244-Neng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGuyatt GH, 2011, J CLIN EPIDEMIOL, V64, P1277, DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.01.011eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceInstitute of Medicine, 2011, CLIN PRACTICE GUIDEL, DOI [DOI 10.17226/13058, 10.17226/13058]eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceIoannidis JPA, 2016, J CLIN EPIDEMIOL, V73, P82, DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.02.012eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceKhangura S, 2012, SYST REV, V1, DOI 10.1186/2046-4053-1-10eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceKinsman L, 2010, BMC MED, V8, DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-8-31eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceKredo T, 2016, INT J QUAL HEALTH C, V28, P122, DOI 10.1093/intqhc/mzv115eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceLee DH, 2011, ARCH INTERN MED, V171, P18, DOI 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.482eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceLugtenberg M, 2009, QUAL SAF HEALTH CARE, V18, P385, DOI 10.1136/qshc.2008.028043eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMcGuirk B, 2001, SPINE, V26, P2615, DOI 10.1097/00007632-200112010-00017eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceNeubauer MA, 2010, J ONCOL PRACT, V6, P12, DOI 10.1200/JOP.091058eng
hcfmusp.relation.referencePoonacha TK, 2011, J CLIN ONCOL, V29, P186, DOI 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.6414eng
hcfmusp.relation.referencePrior M, 2008, J EVAL CLIN PRACT, V14, P888, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01014.xeng
hcfmusp.relation.referencePrusova K, 2014, J OBSTET GYNAECOL, V34, P706, DOI 10.3109/01443615.2014.920794eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceRotter T, 2010, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD006632.pub2eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceRowe AK, 2012, HEALTH POLICY PLANN, V27, P179, DOI 10.1093/heapol/czr033eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSackett DL, 1996, BRIT MED J, V312, P71eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceShackelton RJ, 2009, J EVAL CLIN PRACT, V15, P1035, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01201.xeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSteel N, 2014, J CLIN EPIDEMIOL, V67, P1251, DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.05.020eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceThomas L., 2000, COCHRANE DATABASE SYeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceTricoci P, 2009, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V301, P831, DOI 10.1001/jama.2009.205eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceUS Preventive Services Task Force, BREAST CANC SCREEN Feng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceWelland DE, 1997, AM J SURG, V174, P592, DOI 10.1016/S0002-9610(97)00196-7eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceWhelton PK, 2018, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V71, pE127, DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.11.006eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceWorrall G, 1997, CAN MED ASSOC J, V156, P1705eng
Appears in Collections:

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/InCor
Instituto do Coração - HC/InCor

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
  Restricted Access
publishedVersion (English)138.39 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.