Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/36020
Title: A multicenter, randomized trial comparing pelvic organ prolapse surgical treatment with native tissue and synthetic mesh: A 5-year follow-up study
Authors: SILVEIRA, Simone dos Reis B. daAUGE, Antomio P. F.JARMY-DIBELLA, Zsuzsanna I. K.MARGARIDO, Paulo F. R.CARRAMAO, SilviaRODRIGUES, Claudinei AlvesDOUMOUCHTSIS, Stergios K.BARACAT, Edmund ChadaHADDAD, Jorge Milhem
Citation: NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, v.39, n.3, p.1002-1011, 2020
Abstract: Introduction The aim of this study was to compare long-term outcomes in patients who underwent either native tissue repair or monofilament macroporous polypropylene mesh. Methods This multicenter, randomized trial included-at the end of 5 years follow-up-122 women with severe pelvic organ prolapse, who were randomly assigned to undergo surgical treatment using native tissue repair (native tissue group, n = 59) or synthetic mesh repair (mesh group, n = 63). Cure criterion was when pelvic organ prolapse-quantification (POP-Q) point was <= 0. Quality of life was assessed using the prolapse quality-of-life questionnaire and sexual function with the quality of sexual function. Results Groups were homogeneous preoperatively with the exception of the previous pelvic surgery variable, which was higher in mesh (P = .019). Cure rate was significantly better for mesh group in the anterior compartment (P = .002) and in the combination of all compartments (P = .001). Native tissue group was significantly better when there was prolapse in the posterior and apical compartment (P = .031). In the quality of life analysis, mesh group showed a significant improvement compared with native tissue group (P = .004). Complications were significantly higher in mesh and recurrence in native tissue. Regarding the reoperation rate, there was no difference between groups, but native tissue had a higher reoperation rate due to recurrence (P = .031). Conclusions Outcomes in women with severe POP were better with mesh use than native tissue repair, both in the anterior compartment and in the multicompartmental prolapse after 5-year follow-up. Complications were more common in the mesh group and recurrences were more frequent in the native tissue group.
Appears in Collections:

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MOG
Departamento de Obstetrícia e Ginecologia - FM/MOG

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/ICHC
Instituto Central - HC/ICHC

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HU
Hospital Universitário - HU

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/58
LIM/58 - Laboratório de Ginecologia Estrutural e Molecular


Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
art_SILVEIRA_A_multicenter_randomized_trial_comparing_pelvic_organ_prolapse_2020.PDF.pdf
  Restricted Access
publishedVersion (English)901.98 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.