Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/36314
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSistema FMUSP-HC: Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP) e Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP
dc.contributor.authorKIM, Yeon Jung
dc.contributor.authorSAIKI, Carlos Eduardo Takeshi
dc.contributor.authorSILVA, Karoline
dc.contributor.authorMASSUDA, Carlos Kiyoshi Moreira
dc.contributor.authorFALONI, Ana Paula de Souza
dc.contributor.authorBRAZ-SILVA, Paulo Henrique
dc.contributor.authorPALLOS, Debora
dc.contributor.authorSENDYK, Wilson Roberto
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-01T15:08:17Z-
dc.date.available2020-06-01T15:08:17Z-
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, v.2020, article ID 2494128, 6p, 2020
dc.identifier.issn1687-8728
dc.identifier.urihttps://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/36314-
dc.description.abstractBackground. The aim of this study was to assess the volumetric stability and bone formation in grafts with Bio-Oss and autogenous bone at different proportions in rabbit calvaria. Material and Methods. Ten rabbits received four titanium cylinders in their calvaria and randomly divided into the following groups: Group I: Bio-Oss (100%), Group II: Bio-Oss (75%) + autogenous bone (25%), Group III: Bio-Oss (50%) + autogenous bone (50%), and Group IV: autogenous bone (100%). After twelve weeks, the animals were euthanized, and samples were collected for clinical and histological analysis. Results. Clinical analysis showed that Groups I (90.43 +/- 8.99) and II (90.87 +/- 7.43) had greater dimensional stability compared to Group IV (P=0.0005). Histologically, Groups I, II, and III showed areas of bone formation with particles of biomaterial remaining in close contact with the newly formed bone. However, there were no significant differences between the groups regarding the newly formed bone area. Conclusion. It was concluded that the use of Bio-Oss either alone or associated with the autogenous bone at a proportion of 25% showed superior dimensional stability compared to the use of autogenous bone in the proposed experimental model.eng
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq)National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) [143741/2014-0]
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherHINDAWI LTDeng
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Dentistry
dc.rightsopenAccesseng
dc.subject.othersinus floor augmentationeng
dc.subject.otherdeproteinized bovine boneeng
dc.subject.otherridge augmentationeng
dc.subject.otherposterior maxillaeng
dc.subject.otherimplant siteeng
dc.subject.othermixtureeng
dc.subject.otherreconstructioneng
dc.subject.otherregenerationeng
dc.subject.otherplacementeng
dc.subject.otherxenografteng
dc.titleBone Formation in Grafts with Bio-Oss and Autogenous Bone at Different Proportions in Rabbit Calvariaeng
dc.typearticleeng
dc.rights.holderCopyright HINDAWI LTDeng
dc.identifier.doi10.1155/2020/2494128
dc.identifier.pmid32148500
dc.subject.wosDentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicineeng
dc.type.categoryoriginal articleeng
dc.type.versionpublishedVersioneng
hcfmusp.author.externalKIM, Yeon Jung:Univ Santo Amaro UNISA, Dept Implantol, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
hcfmusp.author.externalSAIKI, Carlos Eduardo Takeshi:Univ Santo Amaro UNISA, Dept Implantol, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
hcfmusp.author.externalSILVA, Karoline:Univ Santo Amaro UNISA, Dept Implantol, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
hcfmusp.author.externalMASSUDA, Carlos Kiyoshi Moreira:Univ Santo Amaro UNISA, Dept Implantol, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
hcfmusp.author.externalFALONI, Ana Paula de Souza:UNIARA Dent Sch, Univ Ctr Araraquara, Implantol Postgrad Course, Dept Hlth Sci, Araraquara, SP, Brazil
hcfmusp.author.externalPALLOS, Debora:Univ Santo Amaro UNISA, Dept Implantol, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
hcfmusp.author.externalSENDYK, Wilson Roberto:Univ Santo Amaro UNISA, Dept Implantol, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
hcfmusp.description.articlenumber2494128
hcfmusp.description.volume2020
hcfmusp.origemWOS
hcfmusp.origem.idWOS:000518684700001
hcfmusp.origem.id2-s2.0-85081010992
hcfmusp.publisher.cityLONDONeng
hcfmusp.publisher.countryENGLANDeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceAludden HC, 2017, INT J ORAL MAX SURG, V46, P1030, DOI 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.03.008eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceAraujo M, 2009, CLIN ORAL IMPLAN RES, V20, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01606.xeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceArtzi Z, 2001, INT J PERIODONT REST, V21, P395eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBrowaeys H, 2007, CLIN IMPLANT DENT R, V9, P166, DOI 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2007.00050.xeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceCarmagnola D, 2008, CLIN ORAL IMPLAN RES, V19, P1246, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01584.xeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceChavda S, 2018, J ORAL IMPLANTOL, V44, P74, DOI 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-17-00053eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGalindo-Moreno P, 2011, CLIN ORAL IMPLAN RES, V22, P857, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02073.xeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGulinelli JL, 2017, INT J ORAL MAX SURG, V46, P1045, DOI 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.03.019eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHallman M, 2002, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V17, P635eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHallman M, 2005, INT J ORAL MAX SURG, V34, P273, DOI 10.1016/j.ijom.2004.09.009eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHassan KS, 2011, ORAL SURG ORAL MED O, V112, pE8, DOI 10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.04.010eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHatano N, 2004, CLIN ORAL IMPLAN RES, V15, P339, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.00996.xeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceJensen T, 2012, CLIN ORAL IMPLAN RES, V23, P263, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02168.xeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceJohansson B, 2001, DENTOMAXILLOFAC RAD, V30, P157, DOI 10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600601eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceKao Solon T, 2007, Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am, V19, P513, DOI 10.1016/j.coms.2007.06.002eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceKim YK, 2009, ORAL SURG ORAL MED O, V107, P204, DOI 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.07.021eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceLambert F, 2011, CLIN ORAL IMPLAN RES, V22, P538, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02069.xeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMaiorana C, 2019, J CRANIO MAXILL SURG, V47, P805, DOI 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.02.002eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMardinger O, 2011, ORAL SURG ORAL MED O, V111, pE6, DOI 10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.09.064eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMeijndert L, 2005, INT J ORAL MAX SURG, V34, P877, DOI 10.1016/j.ijom.2005.04.017eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMooren RECM, 2010, INT J ORAL MAX SURG, V39, P371, DOI 10.1016/j.ijom.2009.12.019eng
hcfmusp.relation.referencePapageorgiou SN, 2016, J DENT, V48, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.03.010eng
hcfmusp.relation.referencePelegrine AA, 2011, CELL TISSUE BANK, V12, P171, DOI 10.1007/s10561-010-9178-4eng
hcfmusp.relation.referencePolo CI, 2013, J PERIODONTOL, V84, P360, DOI 10.1902/jop.2012.110674eng
hcfmusp.relation.referencePripatnanont P, 2009, INT J ORAL MAX SURG, V38, P356, DOI 10.1016/j.ijom.2009.02.015eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSakkas A, 2017, INT J IMPLANT DENT, V3, DOI 10.1186/s40729-017-0084-4eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSchlegel A, 2008, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V23, P289eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceThuaksuban N, 2010, INT J ORAL MAX SURG, V39, P1175, DOI 10.1016/j.ijom.2010.07.008eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceYildirim M, 2001, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V16, P23eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceYoung C, 1999, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V14, P72eng
dc.description.indexPubMedeng
dc.identifier.eissn1687-8736
hcfmusp.citation.scopus22-
hcfmusp.scopus.lastupdate2024-03-29-
Appears in Collections:

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/52
LIM/52 - Laboratório de Virologia


Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
art_KIM_Bone_Formation_in_Grafts_with_BioOss_and_Autogenous_2020.PDFpublishedVersion (English)3.63 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.