Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/38523
Title: Cross-Cultural Validity Study of a Medical Education Leadership Competencies Instrument in Latin American Physicians: A Multinational Study
Authors: MANO, Max S.GOMES, RafaelaWERUTSKY, GustavoBARRIOS, Carlos H.MARTA, Gustavo NaderVILLARREAL-GARZA, CynthiaFRASSON, Antonio LuizSTERNBERG, CinthyaCLARA, RenanSIMON, Sergio D.CITAKU, FadilWALDROP, MarianneVIOLATO, ClaudioZILLIOUX, DonKHAN, Yawar Hayat
Citation: JOURNAL OF GLOBAL ONCOLOGY, v.5, 2019
Abstract: PURPOSE Physicians rarely receive formal training in leadership skills. Citaku and colleagues have identified a set of leadership competencies (LCs) providing validity evidence in North American (NA) and European Union (EU) medical education institutions. We aim to apply this same survey to a sample of Latin American (LA) medical leaders from the oncology community and related areas, compare the results with those of the previous survey, and perform subgroup analyses within the LA cohort. METHODS The survey was sent to nearly 8,000 physicians of participating professional organizations. In addition to the 63 questions, we also collected data on the type of institution, country, specialty, sex, age, years of experience in oncology, and leadership position. RESULTS The 217 LA respondents placed the highest value on task management competencies (91.37% reported these as important or very important v 87.0% of NA/EU respondents; P < .0001), followed by self-management (87.45% of LA respondents v 87.55% of NA/EU respondents; P = not significant [NS]), social responsibility (86.83% of LA respondents v 87.48% of NA/EU respondents; P = NS), innovation (86.69% of LA respondents v 85.31% of NA/EU respondents; P = NS), and leading others (83.31% of LA respondents v 84.71% of NA/EU respondents; P = NS). Social responsibility, which was first in importance in the NA/EU survey, was only third in the LA survey. Subgroup analyses showed significant variations in the ratings of specific LCs within the LA population. CONCLUSION LCs valued by LA leaders somewhat differ from those valued by their NA and EU counterparts, implying that cultural aspects might influence the perception of desired LCs. We also detected variations in the responses within the LA population. Our data indicate that current physician leadership training programs should be tailored to suit specific needs and cultural aspects of each region. Further validity studies of this instrument with other samples and cultures are warranted. (C) 2019 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
Appears in Collections:

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/ICESP
Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo - HC/ICESP


Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
art_MANO_CrossCultural_Validity_Study_of_a_Medical_Education_Leadership_2019.PDF.pdfpublishedVersion (English)614.79 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.