1. Início
  2. Faculdade de Medicina - FM
  3. Departamento de Cirurgia - FM/MCG
  4. Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MCG
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/3865
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSistema FMUSP-HC: Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP) e Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP-
dc.contributor.authorSALLES JR., Guatacara Schenfelder-
dc.contributor.authorFARIA, Jose Carlos Marques de-
dc.contributor.authorBUSNARDO, Fabio Freitas-
dc.contributor.authorGEMPERLI, Rolf-
dc.contributor.authorFERREIRA, Marcus Castro-
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-28T22:16:06Z-
dc.date.available2014-01-28T22:16:06Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationACTA CIRURGICA BRASILEIRA, v.28, n.7, p.509-517, 2013-
dc.identifier.issn0102-8650-
dc.identifier.urihttps://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/3865-
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: To compare sciatic nerve regeneration between non-diabetic (control) and streptozotocin-induced diabetic Wistar rats. METHODS: Four subgroups were evaluated. CN: Non-diabetic rats submitted to neurorrhaphy (n=9); DN: Diabetic rats submitted to neurorrhaphy (n=9); CG: Non-diabetic rats submitted to nerve grafting (n=10); DG: Diabetic rats submitted to nerve grafting (n=9). The nerve regeneration was evaluated by walking track analysis (sciatic functional index), electrophysiological test, histomorphometric analysis and triceps surae muscle weight. RESULTS: At 60 days post-surgery, functional recovery of DN was similar to that of the non-diabetic rats (CN, CG), but DG didn't achieve the same. Evoked potential amplitudes showed no statistically significant differences among subgroups. Triceps surae muscle was heavier in CN. No statistically significant differences were observed between the control and diabetes subgroups with respect to histomorphometric analysis. CONCLUSION: After 60 days, DN had a functionally similar recovery to that of the control animals, whereas nerve grafting in diabetic rats didn't allow the same. The muscle atrophy was lower in CN. In the rest of evaluations, as electrophysiological and histomorphometric, diabetic rats were not different from control ones.-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherACTA CIRURGICA BRASILEIRA-
dc.relation.ispartofActa Cirurgica Brasileira-
dc.rightsopenAccess-
dc.subjectDiabetes Mellitus-
dc.subjectExperimental-
dc.subjectSciatic Nerve-
dc.subjectTransplants-
dc.subjectNerve Regeneration-
dc.subjectRats-
dc.subject.otherwalking-track analysis-
dc.subject.otherperipheral-nerve-
dc.subject.othercompression-
dc.subject.otherneuropathy-
dc.subject.otherperoneal-
dc.subject.otherrecovery-
dc.subject.otherlesions-
dc.subject.otherinjury-
dc.titleEvaluation of nerve regeneration in diabetic rats-
dc.typearticle-
dc.rights.holderCopyright ACTA CIRURGICA BRASILEIRA-
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/S0102-86502013000700006-
dc.identifier.pmid23842932-
dc.subject.wosSurgery-
dc.type.categoryoriginal article-
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion-
hcfmusp.description.beginpage509-
hcfmusp.description.endpage517-
hcfmusp.description.issue7-
hcfmusp.description.volume28-
hcfmusp.origemWOS-
hcfmusp.origem.id2-s2.0-84880355808-
hcfmusp.origem.idWOS:000322407000006-
hcfmusp.origem.idSCIELO:S0102-86502013000700006-
hcfmusp.publisher.citySAO PAULO-
hcfmusp.publisher.countryBRAZIL-
hcfmusp.relation.reference[Anonymous], 1979, J EXP MED-
hcfmusp.relation.reference[Anonymous], 2000, ACTA CIR BRAS-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceDELLON AL, 1994, MICROSURG, V15, P265, DOI 10.1002/micr.1920150409-
hcfmusp.relation.reference[Anonymous], 1992, PLAST RECONSTR SURG-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceDEMEDINACELI L, 1995, J NEUROSCI METH, V58, P29, DOI 10.1016/0165-0270(94)00156-B-
hcfmusp.relation.reference[Anonymous], 1976, BRIT MED J-
hcfmusp.relation.reference[Anonymous], 1988, INT ORTHOP-
hcfmusp.relation.reference[Anonymous], 1981, DIABETES-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGoheen-Robillard B, 2002, LARYNGOSCOPE, V112, P899, DOI 10.1097/00005537-200205000-00022-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBabovic S, 1998, MICROSURG, V18, P9, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2752(1998)18:1<9::AID-MICR3>3.0.CO;2-J-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBAIN JR, 1989, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V83, P129, DOI 10.1097/00006534-198901000-00024-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBISBY MA, 1980, EXP NEUROL, V69, P74, DOI 10.1016/0014-4886(80)90144-2-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBROWN CJ, 1989, MICROSURG, V10, P226, DOI 10.1002/micr.1920100317-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBROWN CJ, 1991, MICROSURG, V12, P76, DOI 10.1002/micr.1920120204-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceDanaei G, 2011, LANCET, V378, P31, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60679-X-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceDash H, 1996, ANN PLAS SURG, V37, P526, DOI 10.1097/00000637-199611000-00012-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceDELLON AL, 1988, ANN PLAS SURG, V20, P117, DOI 10.1097/00000637-198802000-00004-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceDELLON ES, 1991, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V88, P686, DOI 10.1097/00006534-199110000-00020-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceDe Sa JMR, 2004, J NEUROSCI METH, V136, P45, DOI 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.12.018-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceELIASISON SVEN G., 1965, TRANS AMER NEUROL ASS, V90, P35-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceFansa H, 1999, J HAND SURG-BRIT EUR, V24B, P38, DOI 10.1016/S0266-7681(99)90021-9-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHARE GMT, 1992, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V89, P251, DOI 10.1097/00006534-199202000-00009-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHARE GMT, 1993, ANN PLAS SURG, V30, P147, DOI 10.1097/00000637-199302000-00009-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceKennedy JM, 2000, BRAIN, V123, P2118, DOI 10.1093/brain/123.10.2118-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceKennedy JM, 2002, DIABETES, V51, P2233, DOI 10.2337/diabetes.51.7.2233-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceLONGO FM, 1986, MUSCLE NERVE, V9, P385, DOI 10.1002/mus.880090502-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMACKINNON SE, 1985, J HAND SURG-AM, V10A, P906-
hcfmusp.relation.referencePOWELL HC, 1985, ACTA NEUROPATHOL, V68, P295-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSHARMA AK, 1975, J NEUROL SCI, V24, P417, DOI 10.1016/0022-510X(75)90167-7-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSHARMA AK, 1981, ACTA NEUROPATHOL, V53, P257-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSiemionow M, 2007, ANN PLAS SURG, V59, P102, DOI 10.1097/01.sap.0000252067.95690.9b-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceTHOMAS PK, 1970, J ANAT, V106, P463-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceYasihashi S, 1979, REV BRAS ORTOP, V129, P139-
dc.description.indexMEDLINE-
hcfmusp.citation.scopus7-
hcfmusp.scopus.lastupdate2024-03-29-
Appears in Collections:

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MCG
Departamento de Cirurgia - FM/MCG

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/ICHC
Instituto Central - HC/ICHC

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/04
LIM/04 - Laboratório de Microcirurgia

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - ODS/03
ODS/03 - Saúde e bem-estar


Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
art_SALLES JR._Evaluation_of_nerve_regeneration_in_diabetic_rats_2013.PDFpublishedVersion (English)483.92 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.