Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/39909
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor | Sistema FMUSP-HC: Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP) e Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP | |
dc.contributor.author | SILVA, Juliana Coutinho da | |
dc.contributor.author | GOFFI-GOMEZ, Maria Valeria Schmidt | |
dc.contributor.author | TSUJI, Robinson Koji | |
dc.contributor.author | BENTO, Ricardo | |
dc.contributor.author | BRITO NETO, Rubens | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-04-15T19:56:09Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-04-15T19:56:09Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.identifier.citation | AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, v.26, n.2, p.85-94, 2021 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1420-3030 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/39909 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: The spread of excitation (SOE) and auditory nerve recovery function (REC) are objective measures recorded by neural response telemetry and may interfere in cochlear implant (CI) stimulation. Objective: To analyze and correlate SOE with the refractory periods in subjects with pre- and postlingual deafness implanted with different electrode arrays. Methods: This was a retrospective study of 323 ears separated by perimodiolar or straight arrays and by pre- or postlingually deaf recipients. Measures were collected intraoperatively on electrode 11. The SOE width was measured in millimeters at the 0.75 point of the curve, and the relative (tau) and absolute (t0) refractory periods were measured in microseconds. Results: There was a statistical correlation between the SOE and the t0 in the patients with postlingual deafness implanted with the perimodiolar array. The SOE width was statistically different between the straight and perimodiolar arrays and between the pre- and postlingual groups in the perimodiolar array. Tau was statistically different between the pre- and postlingual groups with the straight array and the t0, between the pre- and postlingual groups with the perimodiolar array. Neural response threshold and amplitude of the neural response were not statistically different among groups. Conclusion: There was a correlation between SOE width and t0 only in patients with acquired deafness. The findings suggest that different factors influence SOE and REC, considering SOE is different according to the electrode array and REC being different according the onset of deafness. | eng |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher | KARGER | eng |
dc.relation.ispartof | Audiology and Neuro-Otology | |
dc.rights | restrictedAccess | eng |
dc.subject | Spread of excitation | eng |
dc.subject | Recovery function | eng |
dc.subject | Cochlear implant | eng |
dc.subject | Electrode array | eng |
dc.subject | Prelingual deafness | eng |
dc.subject | Postlingual deafness | eng |
dc.subject | eCAP | eng |
dc.subject | Neural response | eng |
dc.title | Is There Any Correlation between Spread of Excitation Width and the Refractory Properties of the Auditory Nerve in Cochlear Implant Users? | eng |
dc.type | article | eng |
dc.rights.holder | Copyright KARGER | eng |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1159/000508601 | |
dc.identifier.pmid | 32998132 | |
dc.subject.wos | Audiology & Speech-Language Pathology | eng |
dc.subject.wos | Neurosciences | eng |
dc.subject.wos | Otorhinolaryngology | eng |
dc.type.category | original article | eng |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | eng |
hcfmusp.description.beginpage | 85 | |
hcfmusp.description.endpage | 94 | |
hcfmusp.description.issue | 2 | |
hcfmusp.description.volume | 26 | |
hcfmusp.origem | WOS | |
hcfmusp.origem.id | WOS:000625250400003 | |
hcfmusp.origem.id | 2-s2.0-85092672430 | |
hcfmusp.publisher.city | BASEL | eng |
hcfmusp.publisher.country | SWITZERLAND | eng |
hcfmusp.relation.reference | Abbas PJ, 2004, AUDIOL NEURO-OTOL, V9, P203, DOI 10.1159/000078390 | eng |
hcfmusp.relation.reference | Abbas PJ, 1999, EAR HEARING, V20, P45, DOI 10.1097/00003446-199902000-00005 | eng |
hcfmusp.relation.reference | Arnoldner C, 2007, AUDIOL NEURO-OTOL, V12, P313, DOI 10.1159/000103212 | eng |
hcfmusp.relation.reference | Botros A, 2010, EAR HEARING, V31, P380, DOI 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181cb41aa | eng |
hcfmusp.relation.reference | Chatterjee M, 1999, J ACOUST SOC AM, V105, P1853, DOI 10.1121/1.426722 | eng |
hcfmusp.relation.reference | Cohen LT, 2009, HEARING RES, V247, P100, DOI 10.1016/j.heares.2008.11.004 | eng |
hcfmusp.relation.reference | Cohen LT, 2004, INT J AUDIOL, V43, P346, DOI 10.1080/14992020400050044 | eng |
hcfmusp.relation.reference | Cohen LT, 2003, HEARING RES, V179, P72, DOI 10.1016/S0378-5955(03)00096-0 | eng |
hcfmusp.relation.reference | da Silva JC, 2020, EUR ARCH OTO-RHINO-L, DOI 10.1007/s00405-020-06260-9 | eng |
hcfmusp.relation.reference | Davis TJ, 2016, OTOL NEUROTOL, V37, P31, DOI 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000896 | eng |
hcfmusp.relation.reference | Grolman W, 2009, OTOL NEUROTOL, V30, P27, DOI 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31818f57ab | eng |
hcfmusp.relation.reference | Guedes Mariana Cardoso, 2005, Braz J Otorhinolaryngol, V71, P660 | eng |
hcfmusp.relation.reference | He SM, 2018, EAR HEARING, V39, P238, DOI 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000467 | eng |
hcfmusp.relation.reference | Kim BG, 2013, JAMA OTOLARYNGOL, V139, P604, DOI 10.1001/jamaoto.2013.3195 | eng |
hcfmusp.relation.reference | Kutscher Kellen, 2010, Pró-Fono R. Atual. Cient., V22, P473, DOI 10.1590/S0104-56872010000400019 | eng |
hcfmusp.relation.reference | Miller CA, 2000, EAR HEARING, V21, P280, DOI 10.1097/00003446-200008000-00003 | eng |
hcfmusp.relation.reference | Mittmann P, 2016, EUR ARCH OTO-RHINO-L, V273, P4251, DOI 10.1007/s00405-016-4175-2 | eng |
hcfmusp.relation.reference | Morita T, 2003, EUR ARCH OTO-RHINO-L, V260, P67, DOI 10.1007/s00405-002-0521-7 | eng |
hcfmusp.relation.reference | NADOL JB, 1989, ANN OTO RHINOL LARYN, V98, P411, DOI 10.1177/000348948909800602 | eng |
hcfmusp.relation.reference | Shepherd RK, 2004, EUR J NEUROSCI, V20, P3131, DOI 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03809.x | eng |
hcfmusp.relation.reference | Shpak T, 2004, ACTA OTO-LARYNGOL, V124, P679, DOI 10.1080/00016480310002168 | eng |
hcfmusp.relation.reference | Walkowiak Adam, 2010, Cochlear Implants Int, V11 Suppl 1, P479, DOI 10.1179/146701010X12671177204787 | eng |
hcfmusp.relation.reference | Xi X, 2009, ORL-J OTO-RHIN-LARYN, V71, P228, DOI 10.1159/000229303 | eng |
hcfmusp.relation.reference | Zarowski A, 2020, INT J PEDIATR OTORHI, V131, DOI 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.109867 | eng |
dc.description.index | MEDLINE | eng |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1421-9700 | |
hcfmusp.citation.scopus | 0 | - |
hcfmusp.scopus.lastupdate | 2024-03-29 | - |
Appears in Collections: | Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MOF Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/ICHC Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/32 |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
art_SILVA_Is_There_Any_Correlation_between_Spread_of_Excitation_2021.PDF Restricted Access | publishedVersion (English) | 359.95 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.