Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/4125
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSistema FMUSP-HC: Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP) e Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP-
dc.contributor.authorMACHADO, Maria Cecilia-
dc.contributor.authorKARA-JOSE, Newton-
dc.contributor.authorARIETA, Carlos Eduardo Leite-
dc.contributor.authorLOURENCO, Jose Leonardo Garcia-
dc.contributor.authorCARVALHO, Regina de Souza-
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-28T22:24:59Z-
dc.date.available2014-01-28T22:24:59Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.citationREVISTA BRASILEIRA DE OFTALMOLOGIA, v.71, n.6, p.390-393, 2012-
dc.identifier.issn0034-7280-
dc.identifier.urihttps://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/4125-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To assess the waiting time for eye care identifying the number of patients with each complaint; to investigate how the waiting time may worsen the patient's condition; to check the screening of urgent cases for effectiveness; and to devise means of increasing the medical-surgical care capacity. Methods: A retrospective descriptive survey was conducted using data obtained on 12 occasions during collaborative team visits to provide eyecare services. These initiatives were designed to decrease the waiting time and to treat urgent cases that occurred on each occasion; eyecare services were provided every Saturday, in the period from June to August 2006, in 16 cities of the region covered by Conderg (Consortium for the Development of the Sao Joao da Boa Vista Administrative Region). Results: Referrals used 1,743 (87.1%) of the 2,000 places available. The most frequent diagnoses were refractive errors, with 683 cases, corresponding to 39.1% of the total, followed by cataracts, with 296 cases, corresponding to 20.9%. Of the 238 surgeries indicated, 54.6% were phakectomies. Thirty-five (2.0%) cases were considered urgent. Conclusion: The most common diagnoses made during the team visits to manage the excess demand for eyecare were refractive errors and cataracts, which, together, accounted for the majority of the cases. The Divinolandia Hospital has the necessary human and material resources to meet the demand left unattended by the local SUS network. Immediate referral of urgent cases by the primary units' screeners proved effective.-
dc.description.abstractOBJETIVO: Avaliar a fila de espera pelo atendimento oftalmológico detectando os problemas oculares; estudar o agravo que esta espera pode acarretar ao paciente; verificar a eficácia na triagem dos casos de urgência e averiguar a possibilidade de aumento da capacidade de atendimento clínico e cirúrgico. MÉTODOS Foi realizada pesquisa retrospectiva e descritiva dos dados obtidos durante 12 mutirões de atendimento oftalmológico. Os mutirões foram realizados com a intenção de diminuir a fila de espera e atender as urgências que surgiram nos dias de atendimento; ocorreram aos sábados durante os meses de junho a agosto no ano de 2006, em 16 municípios da região do Conderg(Consórcio de Desenvolvimento da Região de Governo de São João da Boa Vista). RESULTADOS: Das 2.000 vagas disponibilizadas, foram utilizadas 1.743 (87,1%) dos encaminhados. Nos diagnósticos realizados se destacam os vícios de refração com 683 casos, correspondendo a 39,1 % seguido de catarata com 296, correspondendo a 20,9. Das 238 cirurgias indicadas, 54,6% foram de facectomia. Foram detectados 35 casos (2,0%) considerados como urgência. CONCLUSÃO: Nos diagnósticos realizados durante os mutirões de atendimento à demanda reprimida, destacaram-se os vícios de refração e catarata; que somados representaram a maioria dos problemas detectados. O Hospital de Divinolândia tem recursos humanos e materiais para atender a demanda gerada, e não absorvida pelo SUS local. O encaminhamento imediato das urgências pelos triadores dos postos de saúde mostrou-se eficaz.-
dc.description.sponsorshipCONDERG - Divinolandia Regional Hospital-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherSOC BRASILEIRA OFTALMOLOGIA-
dc.relation.ispartofRevista Brasileira de Oftalmologia-
dc.rightsopenAccess-
dc.subjectHealth services needs and demand-
dc.subjectWaiting lists-
dc.subjectMedical care-
dc.subjectEyehealth-
dc.subjectPrimary health care-
dc.subjectNecessidades e demandas de serviços de saúde-
dc.subjectListas de espera-
dc.subjectAtendimento médico-
dc.subjectSaúde ocular-
dc.subjectAtenção primária à saúde-
dc.subject.othervisual impairment-
dc.subject.otherprevalence-
dc.subject.otherblindness-
dc.subject.othercataract-
dc.subject.otherbrazil-
dc.titleA study of pent-up demand in ophthalmology: Divinolandia Hospital/Unicamp-
dc.title.alternativeEstudo da demanda reprimida em Oftalmologia: hospital de Divinolândia/Unicamp-
dc.typearticle-
dc.rights.holderCopyright SOC BRASILEIRA OFTALMOLOGIA-
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/S0034-72802012000600010-
dc.subject.wosOphthalmology-
dc.type.categoryoriginal article-
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion-
hcfmusp.author.externalMACHADO, Maria Cecilia:Univ Campinas UNICAMP, Fac Med Sci, Divinolandia, SP, Brazil; Eye Clin Divinolandia, Divinolandia, SP, Brazil-
hcfmusp.author.externalARIETA, Carlos Eduardo Leite:Univ Estadual Campinas UNICAMP, Fac Med Sci, Campinas, SP, Brazil-
hcfmusp.author.externalCARVALHO, Regina de Souza:Univ Sao Paulo, Coll Med, Sao Paulo, Brazil-
hcfmusp.description.beginpage390-
hcfmusp.description.endpage393-
hcfmusp.description.issue6-
hcfmusp.description.volume71-
hcfmusp.origemWOS-
hcfmusp.origem.idWOS:000313987800010-
hcfmusp.origem.id2-s2.0-84873716992-
hcfmusp.origem.idSCIELO:S0034-72802012000600010-
hcfmusp.publisher.cityRIO DE JANEIRO-
hcfmusp.publisher.countryBRAZIL-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceAgencia Nacional de Saude Suplementar-ANS, CAD INF SAUD SUPL-
hcfmusp.relation.reference[Anonymous], C NAC SAUD ON LIN CO-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceArieta CEL, 2009, OPHTHAL EPIDEMIOL, V16, P58, DOI 10.1080/09286580802575032-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceCarazo V, 1986, GUIAS GERENCIA SERVI-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceCarricondo PC, 2009, SAUDE OCULAR PREVENC, P296-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceDineen BP, 2003, BRIT J OPHTHALMOL, V87, P820, DOI 10.1136/bjo.87.7.820-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceArieta CEL, 2003, OPHTHALMIC EPIDEMIOL, V10, P15, DOI 10.1076/opep.10.1.15.13774-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceKara Junior N, 2001, ARQ BRAS OFTALMOL, V64, P39-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceKara-Jose N, 1990, INT OPHTHALMOL, V14, P155-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceKara-Jose N, 1996, ARQ BRAS OFTALMOL, V59, P316-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceKara-Jose N, 2009, SAUDE OCULAR PREVENC, P429-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceKara-Jose N, 2008, CIRURGIA CATARATA NE, P131-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceKara-Jose N, 1996, PREVENCAO CEGUEIRA C, P71-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceKempen John H., 2004, Archives of Ophthalmology, V122, P495-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceKempen JH, 2005, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V123, P1314-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMachado MC, 2010, ARQ BRAS OFTALMOL, V73, P57, DOI 10.1590/S0004-27492010000100010-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMachado MC, 2009, SAUDE OCULAR PREVENC, P304-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMachado MC, 2010, ARQ BRAS OFTALMOL, V73, P276, DOI 10.1590/S0004-27492010000300013-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSANTOS J. S., 2003, MEDICINA, V36, P498-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceThylefors B, 1998, Community Eye Health, V11, P1-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceVargas MA, 2010, REV BRAS OFTALMOL, V69, P77, DOI 10.1590/S0034-72802010000200002-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceVitale S, 2006, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V295, P2158, DOI 10.1001/jama.295.18.2158-
dc.description.indexPubMed-
hcfmusp.citation.scopus0-
hcfmusp.scopus.lastupdate2024-03-29-
Appears in Collections:

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MOF
Departamento de Otorrinolaringologia e Oftalmologia - FM/MOF


Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
art_KARA-JOSE_A_study_of_pent_up_demand_in_ophthalmology_2012.PDFpublishedVersion (English)460.85 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.