Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/48494
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSistema FMUSP-HC: Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP) e Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP-
dc.contributor.authorGALLETTA, Marco Aurelio Knippel-
dc.contributor.authorCARRIERI, Adriana-
dc.contributor.authorPERES, Stela Verzinhasse-
dc.contributor.authorDIAS, Maria Carolina Goncalves-
dc.contributor.authorFRANCISCO, Rossana Pulcineli Vieira-
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-12T17:11:36Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-12T17:11:36Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationNUTRITION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, v.37, n.4, p.887-895, 2022-
dc.identifier.issn0884-5336-
dc.identifier.urihttps://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/48494-
dc.description.abstractBackground Nutrition therapy is a key component in the management of hyperemesis gravidarum (HG). The aim of this study was to describe sociodemographic, anthropometric, and nutrition aspects of pregnant women hospitalized because of HG and raise a discussion about the nutrition care provided. Materials and Methods This is a retrospective descriptive study that includes 26 pregnant women with confirmed diagnosis of HG who were hospitalized because of this condition in a tertiary hospital. Data of interest were collected from official medical records and analyzed to obtain measures of central tendency and dispersion, as well as frequencies. Results The studied individuals had a mean age of 25.7 years and a low level of education, and 65% of them were single mothers. They registered a low weight gain (2.8 kg) during pregnancy and in the course of their hospitalization, during which they lost an average of 1.7 kg, showing a decline in nutrition status during this period. Although the average intake of oral diet (OD) was 55% during hospital stay and only 5% of the studied population met caloric needs through OD, the prescription of complementary medical nutrition therapy (oral supplements, enteral or parenteral nutrition) was scarcely observed in this sample. Conclusion Despite the negative impact that HG can impose on the mother's nutrition status and the known benefits that complementary nutrition therapies can provide, few nutrition interventions have been carried out to improve this situation. That indicates an urgent need for implementation or reviewing of nutrition assistance protocols for HG patients.eng
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherWILEYeng
dc.relation.ispartofNutrition in Clinical Practice-
dc.rightsrestrictedAccesseng
dc.subjecthospitalizationeng
dc.subjecthyperemesis gravidarumeng
dc.subjectnutrition statuseng
dc.subjectnutrition supporteng
dc.subjectnutrition therapyeng
dc.subjectpregnancyeng
dc.subject.othernauseaeng
dc.subject.otheroutcomeseng
dc.titleWeight loss among pregnant women hospitalized because of hyperemesis gravidarum: Is there a lack of nutrition intervention?eng
dc.typearticleeng
dc.rights.holderCopyright WILEYeng
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ncp.10798-
dc.identifier.pmid34751977-
dc.subject.wosNutrition & Dieteticseng
dc.type.categoryoriginal articleeng
dc.type.versionpublishedVersioneng
hcfmusp.author.externalCARRIERI, Adriana:Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Med, Hosp Clin, Div Nutr & Dietet,Inst Cent, Sao Paulo, Brazil-
hcfmusp.description.beginpage887-
hcfmusp.description.endpage895-
hcfmusp.description.issue4-
hcfmusp.description.volume37-
hcfmusp.origemWOS-
hcfmusp.origem.idWOS:000715945500001-
hcfmusp.origem.id2-s2.0-85118686868-
hcfmusp.publisher.cityHOBOKENeng
hcfmusp.publisher.countryUSAeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceAgmon N, 2019, ARCH GYNECOL OBSTET, V300, P347, DOI 10.1007/s00404-019-05192-yeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceAtalah E, 1997, REV MED CHILE, V125, P1429eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceAustin K, 2019, NUTR CLIN PRACT, V34, P226, DOI 10.1002/ncp.10205eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBRAMER G R, 1988, World Health Statistics Quarterly, V41, P32eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceDean CR, 2018, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V363, DOI 10.1136/bmj.k5000eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceDinberu MT, 2019, BMJ OPEN, V9, DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025841eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceEinarson A, 2007, CAN FAM PHYSICIAN, V53, P2109eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceEinarson TR, 2013, J POPUL THER CLIN PH, V20, pE171eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceFejzo MS, 2009, J WOMENS HEALTH, V18, P1981, DOI 10.1089/jwh.2009.1431eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceFiaschi L, 2019, BJOG-INT J OBSTET GY, V126, P1201, DOI 10.1111/1471-0528.15662eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGolberg D, 2007, OBSTET GYNECOL, V110, P695, DOI 10.1097/01.AOG.0000278571.93861.26eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGrooten IJ, 2017, AM J CLIN NUTR, V106, P812, DOI 10.3945/ajcn.117.158931eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGunay Taner, 2020, Medeni Med J, V35, P8, DOI 10.5222/MMJ.2020.57767eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHastoy A, 2015, J GYNECOL OBST BIO R, V44, P154, DOI 10.1016/j.jgyn.2013.12.003eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHolmgren C, 2008, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V198, DOI [10.1016/j.ajog.2007.06.004, 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.06.078]eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceKim DR, 2009, ARCH WOMEN MENT HLTH, V12, P61, DOI 10.1007/s00737-009-0064-7eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceKominiarek MA, 2016, MED CLIN N AM, V100, P1199, DOI 10.1016/j.mcna.2016.06.004eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceKondrup J, 2003, CLIN NUTR, V22, P321, DOI 10.1016/S0261-5614(02)00214-5eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceLacroix R, 2000, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V182, P931, DOI 10.1016/S0002-9378(00)70349-8eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceLondon V, 2017, PHARMACOLOGY, V100, P161, DOI 10.1159/000477853eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMaslin K, 2021, EUR J OBSTET GYN R B, V257, P76, DOI 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.12.003eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMeinich T, 2020, BMC PREGNANCY CHILDB, V20, DOI 10.1186/s12884-020-02947-3eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceNiebyl JR, 2010, NEW ENGL J MED, V363, P1544, DOI 10.1056/NEJMcp1003896eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceOtten JJ, 2006, DIETARY REFERENCE INeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSCHULMAN PK, 1982, J AM DIET ASSOC, V80, P577eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSonkusare S, 2011, ARCH GYNECOL OBSTET, V283, P1183, DOI 10.1007/s00404-011-1877-yeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceStokke G, 2015, ACTA OBSTET GYN SCAN, V94, P359, DOI 10.1111/aogs.12578eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceToriello HV, 2013, AM J MED GENET A, V161A, P417, DOI 10.1002/ajmg.a.35765eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceTrumbo P, 2002, J AM DIET ASSOC, V102, P1621, DOI 10.1016/S0002-8223(02)90346-9eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceVANSTUIJVENBERG ME, 1995, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V172, P1585, DOI 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90501-4eng
dc.description.indexMEDLINEeng
dc.identifier.eissn1941-2452-
hcfmusp.citation.scopus1-
hcfmusp.scopus.lastupdate2024-03-29-
Appears in Collections:

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MOG
Departamento de Obstetrícia e Ginecologia - FM/MOG

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/ICHC
Instituto Central - HC/ICHC

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/57
LIM/57 - Laboratório de Fisiologia Obstétrica

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - ODS/02
ODS/02 - Fome zero e agricultura sustentável


Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
art_GALLETTA_Weight_loss_among_pregnant_women_hospitalized_because_of_2022.PDF
  Restricted Access
publishedVersion (English)204.46 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.