Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/5474
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSistema FMUSP-HC: Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP) e Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP-
dc.contributor.authorALMOBARAK, Faisal A.-
dc.contributor.authorO'LEARY, Neil-
dc.contributor.authorREIS, Alexandre S. C.-
dc.contributor.authorSHARPE, Glen P.-
dc.contributor.authorHUTCHISON, Donna M.-
dc.contributor.authorNICOLELA, Marcelo T.-
dc.contributor.authorCHAUHAN, Balwantray C.-
dc.date.accessioned2014-04-28T22:05:45Z-
dc.date.available2014-04-28T22:05:45Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationINVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, v.55, n.2, p.1161-1168, 2014-
dc.identifier.issn0146-0404-
dc.identifier.urihttps://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/5474-
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE. To quantify and characterize the difference between automated and manual segmentation of optic nerve head structures with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). METHODS. Optic nerve head radial scans in 107 glaucoma patients and 48 healthy controls were conducted with SD-OCT. Independent segmentations of the internal limiting membrane (ILM) and Bruch's membrane opening (BMO) were performed manually with custom software and with an automated algorithm in each radial scan. The minimum distance between BMO and ILM, termed BMO-minimum rim width (BMO-MRW) was calculated with each segmentation method. Absolute differences between automated and manual segmentations of ILM (Delta ILM) and BMO (Delta BMO), and the resulting computation of BMO-MRW (Delta BMO-MRW) were computed. Finally, the relationship between image quality score and Delta ILM and Delta BMO was explored. RESULTS. The median (interquartile range, IQR) Delta ILM was 8.9 (6.5, 13.4) mu m in patients and 7.3 (5.3, 9.9) mu m in controls. The corresponding values for Delta BMO were 11.5 (6.6, 22.1) mu m and 12.4 (6.8, 25.4) mu m. Subject-averaged Delta ILM was higher in patients than controls (P < 0.01); however, mean Delta BMO was not (P = 0.09). The median (IQR) subject-averaged absolute Delta BMO-MRW was 13.4 (10.6, 16.8) mu m in patients and 12.1 (10.0, 16.8) mu m in controls and not statistically different (P = 0.21). Mean image quality score was statistically higher in controls than patients (P = 0.03) but not related to subject-averaged Delta ILM or Delta BMO. CONCLUSIONS. In individual scans, the median difference in ILM and BMO segmentations was < 2 and < 3 image pixels, respectively. There were no differences between patients and controls in Delta BMO-MRW.-
dc.description.sponsorshipCanadian Institutes of Health Research, Ottawa, Ontario [MOP11357]-
dc.description.sponsorshipCapes Foundation, Ministry of Education of Brazil, Brasilia, Brazil-
dc.description.sponsorshipHeidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherASSOC RESEARCH VISION OPHTHALMOLOGY INC-
dc.relation.ispartofInvestigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science-
dc.rightsopenAccess-
dc.subjectoptic nerve head-
dc.subjectoptical coherence tomography-
dc.subject.otherdisc margin anatomy-
dc.subject.otherretina-
dc.subject.otherrim-
dc.subject.otherparameters-
dc.subject.otherglaucoma-
dc.subject.otheroct-
dc.subject.othercup-
dc.titleAutomated Segmentation of Optic Nerve Head Structures With Optical Coherence Tomography-
dc.typearticle-
dc.rights.holderCopyright ASSOC RESEARCH VISION OPHTHALMOLOGY INC-
dc.identifier.doi10.1167/iovs.13-13310-
dc.identifier.pmid24474272-
dc.subject.wosOphthalmology-
dc.type.categoryoriginal article-
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion-
hcfmusp.author.externalALMOBARAK, Faisal A.:Dalhousie Univ, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Halifax, NS B3H 2Y9, Canada; King Saud Univ, Coll Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Riyadh 11461, Saudi Arabia-
hcfmusp.author.externalO'LEARY, Neil:Dalhousie Univ, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Halifax, NS B3H 2Y9, Canada; Univ Manchester, Sch Med, Inst Populat Hlth, Ctr Biostat, Manchester, Lancs, England-
hcfmusp.author.externalSHARPE, Glen P.:Dalhousie Univ, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Halifax, NS B3H 2Y9, Canada-
hcfmusp.author.externalHUTCHISON, Donna M.:Dalhousie Univ, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Halifax, NS B3H 2Y9, Canada-
hcfmusp.author.externalNICOLELA, Marcelo T.:Dalhousie Univ, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Halifax, NS B3H 2Y9, Canada-
hcfmusp.author.externalCHAUHAN, Balwantray C.:Dalhousie Univ, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Halifax, NS B3H 2Y9, Canada-
hcfmusp.description.beginpage1161-
hcfmusp.description.endpage1168-
hcfmusp.description.issue2-
hcfmusp.description.volume55-
hcfmusp.origemWOS-
hcfmusp.origem.id2-s2.0-84897624152-
hcfmusp.origem.idWOS:000331891700064-
hcfmusp.publisher.cityROCKVILLE-
hcfmusp.publisher.countryUSA-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceAbramoff MD, 2009, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V50, P5778, DOI 10.1167/iovs.09-3790-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceAiraksinen PJ, 1996, GLAUCOMAS, P617-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBurk ROW, 2000, GRAEF ARCH CLIN EXP, V238, P375, DOI 10.1007/s004170050368-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceChauhan BC, 2013, AM J OPHTHALMOL, V156, P218, DOI 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.04.016-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceChauhan BC, 2013, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V120, P535, DOI 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.09.055-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceChen Teresa C, 2009, Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc, V107, P254-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceFriedman JH, 1984, 1 STANF U-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHu ZH, 2010, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V51, P5708, DOI 10.1167/iovs.09-4838-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceIverson SM, 2013, EYE, V27, P1180, DOI 10.1038/eye.2013.163-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceKim M, 2013, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V120, P1790, DOI 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.02.011-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceLangenegger SJ, 2011, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V52, P3338, DOI 10.1167/iovs.10-6611-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMesiwala NK, 2012, J GLAUCOMA, V21, P367, DOI 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31821206e8-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMesiwala NK, 2012, J GLAUCOMA, V21, P516, DOI 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3182253e58-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMwanza JC, 2010, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V51, P5724, DOI 10.1167/iovs.10-5222-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMwanza JC, 2011, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V118, P241, DOI 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.06.036-
hcfmusp.relation.referencePoli A, 2008, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V49, P3970, DOI 10.1167/iovs.08-1764-
hcfmusp.relation.referencePovazay B, 2007, J BIOMED OPT, V12, DOI 10.1117/1.2773736-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceReis ASC, 2012, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V53, P1852, DOI 10.1167/iovs.11-9309-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceReis ASC, 2012, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V119, P738, DOI 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.054-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSrinivasan VJ, 2008, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V49, P5103, DOI 10.1167/iovs.08-2127-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceStrouthidis NG, 2011, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V52, P1206, DOI 10.1167/iovs.10-5599-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceStrouthidis NG, 2009, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V50, P4709, DOI 10.1167/iovs.09-3586-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceStrouthidis NG, 2009, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V50, P2165, DOI 10.1167/iovs.08-2786-
hcfmusp.relation.referencevan Velthoven MEJ, 2007, PROG RETIN EYE RES, V26, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2006.10.002-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceWerkmeister RM, 2012, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V53, P6062, DOI 10.1167/iovs.12-9514-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceWojtkowski M, 2005, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V112, P1734, DOI 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.05.023-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceZhu HG, 2010, OPT EXPRESS, V18, P24595, DOI 10.1364/OE.18.024595-
dc.description.indexMEDLINE-
dc.identifier.eissn1552-5783-
hcfmusp.remissive.sponsorshipCAPES-
hcfmusp.remissive.sponsorshipCIHR-
hcfmusp.citation.scopus28-
hcfmusp.scopus.lastupdate2022-07-29-
Appears in Collections:

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/ICHC
Instituto Central - HC/ICHC

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/33
LIM/33 - Laboratório de Oftalmologia


Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
art_REIS_Automated_Segmentation_of_Optic_Nerve_Head_Structures_With_2014.PDFpublishedVersion (English)732.79 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.