Sistema FMUSP-HC: Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP) e Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSPNASSAR JUNIOR, Antonio PauloFARIAS, Alberto QueirozALBUQUERQUE, Luiz Augusto Carneiro d'CARRILHO, Flair JoseMALBOUISSON, Luiz Marcelo Sa2015-02-062015-02-062014PLOS ONE, v.9, n.9, article ID e107466, 7p, 20141932-6203https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/8451Background: Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is a severe and progressive functional renal failure occurring in patients with cirrhosis and ascites. Terlipressin is recognized as an effective treatment of HRS, but it is expensive and not widely available. Norepinephrine could be an effective alternative. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of norepinephrine compared to terlipressin in the management of HRS. Methods: We searched the Medline, Embase, Scopus, CENTRAL, Lilacs and Scielo databases for randomized trials of norepinephrine and terlipressin in the treatment of HRS up to January 2014. Two reviewers collected data and assessed the outcomes and risk of bias. The primary outcome was the reversal of HRS. Secondary outcomes were mortality, recurrence of HRS and adverse events. Results: Four studies comprising 154 patients were included. All trials were considered to be at overall high risk of bias. There was no difference in the reversal of HRS (RR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.76 to 1.23), mortality at 30 days (RR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.68 to 1.17) and recurrence of HRS (RR = 0.72; 95% CI = 0.36 to 1.45) between norepinephrine and terlipressin. Adverse events were less common with norepinephrine (RR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.15 to 0.83). Conclusions: Norepinephrine seems to be an attractive alternative to terlipressin in the treatment of HRS and is associated with less adverse events. However, these findings are based on data extracted from only four small studies.engopenAccesscontrolled-trialcirrhosisnoradrenalinepilotalbuminpredictorsdiagnosissurvivalascitesTerlipressin versus Norepinephrine in the Treatment of Hepatorenal Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisarticleCopyright PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE10.1371/journal.pone.0107466Multidisciplinary Sciences