SERGIO EIJI MATUGUMA
Índice h a partir de 2011
11
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Instituto Central, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Médico
62 resultados
Resultados de Busca
Agora exibindo 1 - 10 de 62
conferenceObject EUS-FNA OF PANCREATIC SOLID MASSES: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING SUCTION WITH SLOW PULL(2018) CHENG, Spencer; DANIELLE, Chacon A.; ARTIFON, Everson L.; MATUGUMA, Sergio E.; SANTOS, Marcos E. dos; SAKAI, Christiano M.; CHAVES, Dalton; MOURA, Diogo T. De; MOURA, Eduardo T.- Managing adverse events after endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of the biliary tract and pancreatic fluid collections: Narrative review (with video)(2022) FUNARI, Mateus Pereira; RIBEIRO, Igor Braga; SANTOS, Marcos Eduardo Lera dos; MATUGUMA, Sergio Eiji; MOURA, Eduardo Guimaraes Hourneaux deEndoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided therapeutic procedures have become increasingly common in clinical practice. The development of EUS-guided fine needle aspiration cytology led to the concept of interventional EUS. However, it carries a considerable risk of adverse events (AEs), which occur in approximately 23% of the procedures performed for the drainage of pancreatic fluid collections and 2.5-37.0% of those performed for drainage of the biliary tract. Although the vast majority of AEs occurring after EUS-guided drainage are mild, a deep understanding of such events is necessary for their appropriate management. Because EUS-guided drainage is a novel procedure, there have been few studies of the topic. To our knowledge, this is the first narrative review that focuses on the management and resolution of AEs occurring after EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections or the biliary tract. We also include an explanatory video.
bookPart Endoscopia digestiva alta em paciente com anatomia preservada e nas malformações congênitas(2014) GOMES, Hélcio Cardoso; MATUGUMA, Sergio Eiji; TOMISHIGE, ToshiroconferenceObject Extreme Endoscopic Treatment for Gastric Bypass Anastomosis Disconnection(2017) MOURA, Eduardo G. de; MINATA, Mauricio K.; SANTOS, Marcos E. dos; MOURA, Diogo T. de; CLEMENTE JUNIOR, Cesar C. de; MATUGUMA, Sergio E.; SANTO, Marco AurelioconferenceObject COMPARISON OF MIGRATION RATE OF LUMEN-APPOSING METAL STENT AND STANDARD COVERED SELF-EXPANDING METAL STENT FOR ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND-GUIDED PANCREATIC FLUID COLLECTION DRAINAGE: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL(2020) SANTOS, Marcos E. dos; MATSUBAYASHI, Carolina O.; GUEDES, Hugo G.; PROENCA, Igor M.; NETO, Antonio C. Madruga; VISCONTI, Thiago A.; MATUGUMA, Sergio E.; MOURA, Eduardo G. de- A comparison of the efficiency of 22G versus 25G needles in EUS-FNA for solid pancreatic mass assessment: A systematic review and meta-analysis(2018) GUEDES, Hugo Goncalo; MOURA, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de; DUARTE, Ralph Braga; CORDERO, Martin Andres Coronel; SANTOS, Marcos Eduardo Lera dos; CHENG, Spencer; MATUGUMA, Sergio Eiji; CHAVES, Dalton Marques; BERNARDO, Wanderley Marques; MOURA, Eduardo Guimaraes Hourneaux deOur aim in this study was to compare the efficiency of 25G versus 22G needles in diagnosing solid pancreatic lesions by EUS-FNA. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. Studies were identified in five databases using an extensive search strategy. Only randomized trials comparing 22G and 25G needles were included. The results were analyzed by fixed and random effects. A total of 504 studies were found in the search, among which 4 randomized studies were selected for inclusion in the analysis. A total of 462 patients were evaluated (233: 25G needle/229: 22G needle). The diagnostic sensitivity was 93% for the 25G needle and 91% for the 22G needle. The specificity of the 25G needle was 87%, and that of the 22G needle was 83%. The positive likelihood ratio was 4.57 for the 25G needle and 4.26 for the 22G needle. The area under the sROC curve for the 25G needle was 0.9705, and it was 0.9795 for the 22G needle, with no statistically significant difference between them (p=0.497). Based on randomized studies, this meta-analysis did not demonstrate a significant difference between the 22G and 25G needles used during EUS-FNA in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions.
conferenceObject Results of Endoscopic Cyanoacrylate Injection for the Treatment of Esophageal Variceal Hemorrhage in Child-Pugh C Patients(2012) RIBEIRO, Joao Paulo A.; MALUF-FILHO, Fauze; MATUGUMA, Swrgio E.; HERMAN, Paulo; SAKAI, Paulo; D'ALBUQUERQUE, Luiz Augusto C.- Suction versus slow-pull for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic tumors: a prospective randomized trial(2020) CHENG, Spencer; BRUNALDI, Vitor O.; MINATA, Mauricio K.; CHACON, Danielle A.; SILVEIRA, Eduardo B.; MOURA, Diogo T. H. de; SANTOS, Marcos E. L. Dos; MATUGUMA, Sergio E.; CHAVES, Dalton M.; FRANCA, Raony F.; JACOMO, Alfredo L.; ARTIFON, Everson L. A.Background: Suction (S) is commonly used to improve cell acquisition during endoscopic ultrasoundguided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA). Slow-pull (SP) sampling is another technique that might procure good quality specimens with less bloodiness. We aimed to determine if SP improves the diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA of pancreatic masses. Methods: Patients with pancreatic solid masses were randomized to four needle passes with both techniques in an alternate fashion. Sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values were calculated. Cellularity and bloodiness of cytological samples were assessed and compared according to the technique. Results: Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of suction vs. SP were 95.2% vs. 92.3%; 100% vs. 100; 95.7% vs. 93%, respectively. As to the association of methods, they were 95.6, 100 and 96%, respectively. Positive predictive values for S and SP were 100%. There was no difference in diagnostic yield between S and SP (p = 0.344). Cellularity of samples obtained with SP and Suction were equivalent in both smear evaluation (p = 0.119) and cell-block (0.980). Bloodiness of SP and suction techniques were similar as well. Conclusions: S and SP techniques provide equivalent sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Association of methods seems to improve diagnostic yield. Suction does not increase the bloodiness of samples compared to slow-pull.
conferenceObject Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilation Associated With Sphincterotomy for Extraction of Large Bile Duct Stones(2012) LUZ, Gustavo O.; MOURA, Eduardo G. De; MEINE, Gilmara C.; CARNEIRO, Fred O.; MEDRADO, Bruno F.; ALMEIDA, Maira R.; MALUF-FILHO, Fauze; LERA, Marcos; IDE, Edson; FURUYA, Carlos K.; CHAVES, Dalton M.; CHENG, Spencer; MATUGUMA, Sergio E.; TOMISHIGE, Toshiro; HONDO, Fabio Y.; BARACAT, Renato; ARTIFON, Everson L.; FRANZINI, Tomazo; SAKAI, PauloCommon bile duct stones larger than 15mm are related to a higher rate of failure of endoscopic ductal clearance and need for mechanical lithotripsy. Recently, endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EPLBD) associated with endoscopic sphyncterotomy (ES) has been advocated for the management of difficult bile duct stones. Objective: Evaluate the efficacy and safety of EPLBD associated with ES for removal of large bile duct stones. Patients and methods: retrospective review of prospectively collected data in an academic tertiary referral center, from November 2009 to August 2011. Ampullary dilation was performed with a wire guided hydrostatic balloon (CRE/Boston Scientific) which size ranged from 12 to 20mm. The stone size and the duct diameter directed the choice of the balloon diameter. Balloon was inflated with diluted contrast medium under endoscopic and fluoroscopic control until waist disappearance and/or maximal balloon pressure. After dilation stones were extracted with the aid of standard accessories and techniques. Outcomes and adverse events were recorded. Results: A total of 730 patients with common bile duct stones were admitted for ERCP in our institution. 123 (16,8%) patients were submitted to EPLBD after sphincterotomy. The mean age was 56 years (22-98) and 77 were female (63%). The size of the stones ranged from 13 to 30mm. Initial procedure success rate without mechanical lithitripsy was 83% (102/123). In further 4 patients (3,2%) mechanical lithotripsy was used with 75% success rate (3/4). For the remaining 17 patients, mechanical litotripsy was not available and a 10Fr biliary stent was introduced to prevent obstruction and cholangitis. The total adverse events rate was 3,2%. There were 2 cases of perforation with 20mm balloon (1,6%), both treated conservatively, and two cases of mild acute pancreatitis (1,6%). None of the patients presented bleeding that required transfusion or hospitalization. Conclusion: EPLBD after sphincterotomy is a safe and effective technique for the management of large bile duct stones and it avoids mechanical lithotripsy in the majority of cases.- Penetrance of Functioning and Nonfunctioning Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors in Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1 in the Second Decade of Life(2014) GONCALVES, Tatiana D.; TOLEDO, Rodrigo A.; SEKIYA, Tomoko; MATUGUMA, Sergio E.; MALUF FILHO, Fauze; ROCHA, Manoel S.; SIQUEIRA, Sheila A. C.; GLEZER, Andrea; BRONSTEIN, Marcelo D.; PEREIRA, Maria A. A.; JUREIDINI, Ricardo; BACCHELLA, Telesforo; MACHADO, Marcel C. C.; TOLEDO, Sergio P. A.; LOURENCO JR., Delmar M.Context: Data are scarce on the penetrance of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1)-related nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PETs) and insulinomas in young MEN1 patients. Apotential positive correlation between tumor size and malignancy (2-3 cm, 18%; >3 cm, 43%) has greatly influenced the management of MEN1 adults with NF-PETs. Objective: The aim of the study was to estimate the penetrance of NF-PETs, insulinomas, and gastrinomas in young MEN1 carriers. Design: The data were obtained from a screening program (1996-2012) involving 113 MEN1 patients in a tertiary academic reference center. Patients: Nineteen MEN1 patients (aged 12-20 y; 16 patients aged 15-20 y and 3 patients aged 12-14 y) were screened for NF-PETs, insulinomas, and gastrinomas. Methods: Magnetic resonance imaging/computed tomography and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) were performed on 10 MEN1 carriers, magnetic resonance imaging/computed tomography was performed on five patients, and four other patients underwent an EUS. Results: The overall penetrance of PETs during the second decade of life was42%(8 of 19). All eight PET patients had NF-PETs, and half of those tumors were multicentric. One-fifth of the screened patients (21%; 4 of 19) harbored at least one large tumor (>2.0 cm). Insulinoma was detected in two NF-PET patients (11%) at the initial screening; gastrinoma was not present in any cases. Six of the 11 (54%) screened patients aged 15-20 years who underwent an EUS had NF-PETs. Potential false-positive EUS results were excluded based on EUS-guided biopsy results, the reproducibility of the NF-PET findings, or the observation of increased tumor size during follow-up. Distal pancreatectomy and the nodule enucleation of pancreatic head tumors were conducted on three patients with large tumors (>2.0 cm; T2N0M0) that were classified as grade 1 neuroendocrine tumors (Ki-67 < 2%). Conclusions: Our data demonstrated high penetrance of NF-PETs in 15- to 20-year-old MEN1 patients. The high percentage of the patients presenting consensus criteria for surgery for NF-PET alone or NF-PET/insulinoma suggests a potential benefit for the periodic surveillance of these tumors in this age group.