MARCOS EDUARDO LERA DOS SANTOS
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Instituto Central, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Médico
54 resultados
Resultados de Busca
Agora exibindo 1 - 10 de 54
- Managing adverse events after endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of the biliary tract and pancreatic fluid collections: Narrative review (with video)(2022) FUNARI, Mateus Pereira; RIBEIRO, Igor Braga; SANTOS, Marcos Eduardo Lera dos; MATUGUMA, Sergio Eiji; MOURA, Eduardo Guimaraes Hourneaux deEndoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided therapeutic procedures have become increasingly common in clinical practice. The development of EUS-guided fine needle aspiration cytology led to the concept of interventional EUS. However, it carries a considerable risk of adverse events (AEs), which occur in approximately 23% of the procedures performed for the drainage of pancreatic fluid collections and 2.5-37.0% of those performed for drainage of the biliary tract. Although the vast majority of AEs occurring after EUS-guided drainage are mild, a deep understanding of such events is necessary for their appropriate management. Because EUS-guided drainage is a novel procedure, there have been few studies of the topic. To our knowledge, this is the first narrative review that focuses on the management and resolution of AEs occurring after EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections or the biliary tract. We also include an explanatory video.
conferenceObject Extreme Endoscopic Treatment for Gastric Bypass Anastomosis Disconnection(2017) MOURA, Eduardo G. de; MINATA, Mauricio K.; SANTOS, Marcos E. dos; MOURA, Diogo T. de; CLEMENTE JUNIOR, Cesar C. de; MATUGUMA, Sergio E.; SANTO, Marco AurelioconferenceObject COMPARISON OF MIGRATION RATE OF LUMEN-APPOSING METAL STENT AND STANDARD COVERED SELF-EXPANDING METAL STENT FOR ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND-GUIDED PANCREATIC FLUID COLLECTION DRAINAGE: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL(2020) SANTOS, Marcos E. dos; MATSUBAYASHI, Carolina O.; GUEDES, Hugo G.; PROENCA, Igor M.; NETO, Antonio C. Madruga; VISCONTI, Thiago A.; MATUGUMA, Sergio E.; MOURA, Eduardo G. de- Acute esophageal necrosis (black esophagus) with active upper gastrointestinal bleeding: What to do?(2021) RIBEIRO, Igor Braga; LUZ, Gustavo de Oliveira; SOUZA, Gabriel Mayo Vieira de; BOGHOSSIAN, Mateus Bond; MONTE JUNIOR, Epifanio Silvino do; SANTOS, Marcos Eduardo Lera dos; MOURA, Eduardo Guimaraes Hourneaux de
conferenceObject SEDATION IN DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY - PROPOFOL VERSUS TRADITIONAL SEDATIVE AGENTS: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW WITH META-ANALYSIS(2018) DELGADO, Aureo A.; BERNARDO, Wanderlei M.; COUTINHO, Lara M.; MARINHO, Fabio R.; LERA, Marcos; IDE, Edson; MOURA, Eduardo G. de- A comparison of the efficiency of 22G versus 25G needles in EUS-FNA for solid pancreatic mass assessment: A systematic review and meta-analysis(2018) GUEDES, Hugo Goncalo; MOURA, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de; DUARTE, Ralph Braga; CORDERO, Martin Andres Coronel; SANTOS, Marcos Eduardo Lera dos; CHENG, Spencer; MATUGUMA, Sergio Eiji; CHAVES, Dalton Marques; BERNARDO, Wanderley Marques; MOURA, Eduardo Guimaraes Hourneaux deOur aim in this study was to compare the efficiency of 25G versus 22G needles in diagnosing solid pancreatic lesions by EUS-FNA. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. Studies were identified in five databases using an extensive search strategy. Only randomized trials comparing 22G and 25G needles were included. The results were analyzed by fixed and random effects. A total of 504 studies were found in the search, among which 4 randomized studies were selected for inclusion in the analysis. A total of 462 patients were evaluated (233: 25G needle/229: 22G needle). The diagnostic sensitivity was 93% for the 25G needle and 91% for the 22G needle. The specificity of the 25G needle was 87%, and that of the 22G needle was 83%. The positive likelihood ratio was 4.57 for the 25G needle and 4.26 for the 22G needle. The area under the sROC curve for the 25G needle was 0.9705, and it was 0.9795 for the 22G needle, with no statistically significant difference between them (p=0.497). Based on randomized studies, this meta-analysis did not demonstrate a significant difference between the 22G and 25G needles used during EUS-FNA in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions.
- Suction versus slow-pull for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic tumors: a prospective randomized trial(2020) CHENG, Spencer; BRUNALDI, Vitor O.; MINATA, Mauricio K.; CHACON, Danielle A.; SILVEIRA, Eduardo B.; MOURA, Diogo T. H. de; SANTOS, Marcos E. L. Dos; MATUGUMA, Sergio E.; CHAVES, Dalton M.; FRANCA, Raony F.; JACOMO, Alfredo L.; ARTIFON, Everson L. A.Background: Suction (S) is commonly used to improve cell acquisition during endoscopic ultrasoundguided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA). Slow-pull (SP) sampling is another technique that might procure good quality specimens with less bloodiness. We aimed to determine if SP improves the diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA of pancreatic masses. Methods: Patients with pancreatic solid masses were randomized to four needle passes with both techniques in an alternate fashion. Sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values were calculated. Cellularity and bloodiness of cytological samples were assessed and compared according to the technique. Results: Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of suction vs. SP were 95.2% vs. 92.3%; 100% vs. 100; 95.7% vs. 93%, respectively. As to the association of methods, they were 95.6, 100 and 96%, respectively. Positive predictive values for S and SP were 100%. There was no difference in diagnostic yield between S and SP (p = 0.344). Cellularity of samples obtained with SP and Suction were equivalent in both smear evaluation (p = 0.119) and cell-block (0.980). Bloodiness of SP and suction techniques were similar as well. Conclusions: S and SP techniques provide equivalent sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Association of methods seems to improve diagnostic yield. Suction does not increase the bloodiness of samples compared to slow-pull.
conferenceObject Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilation Associated With Sphincterotomy for Extraction of Large Bile Duct Stones(2012) LUZ, Gustavo O.; MOURA, Eduardo G. De; MEINE, Gilmara C.; CARNEIRO, Fred O.; MEDRADO, Bruno F.; ALMEIDA, Maira R.; MALUF-FILHO, Fauze; LERA, Marcos; IDE, Edson; FURUYA, Carlos K.; CHAVES, Dalton M.; CHENG, Spencer; MATUGUMA, Sergio E.; TOMISHIGE, Toshiro; HONDO, Fabio Y.; BARACAT, Renato; ARTIFON, Everson L.; FRANZINI, Tomazo; SAKAI, PauloCommon bile duct stones larger than 15mm are related to a higher rate of failure of endoscopic ductal clearance and need for mechanical lithotripsy. Recently, endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EPLBD) associated with endoscopic sphyncterotomy (ES) has been advocated for the management of difficult bile duct stones. Objective: Evaluate the efficacy and safety of EPLBD associated with ES for removal of large bile duct stones. Patients and methods: retrospective review of prospectively collected data in an academic tertiary referral center, from November 2009 to August 2011. Ampullary dilation was performed with a wire guided hydrostatic balloon (CRE/Boston Scientific) which size ranged from 12 to 20mm. The stone size and the duct diameter directed the choice of the balloon diameter. Balloon was inflated with diluted contrast medium under endoscopic and fluoroscopic control until waist disappearance and/or maximal balloon pressure. After dilation stones were extracted with the aid of standard accessories and techniques. Outcomes and adverse events were recorded. Results: A total of 730 patients with common bile duct stones were admitted for ERCP in our institution. 123 (16,8%) patients were submitted to EPLBD after sphincterotomy. The mean age was 56 years (22-98) and 77 were female (63%). The size of the stones ranged from 13 to 30mm. Initial procedure success rate without mechanical lithitripsy was 83% (102/123). In further 4 patients (3,2%) mechanical lithotripsy was used with 75% success rate (3/4). For the remaining 17 patients, mechanical litotripsy was not available and a 10Fr biliary stent was introduced to prevent obstruction and cholangitis. The total adverse events rate was 3,2%. There were 2 cases of perforation with 20mm balloon (1,6%), both treated conservatively, and two cases of mild acute pancreatitis (1,6%). None of the patients presented bleeding that required transfusion or hospitalization. Conclusion: EPLBD after sphincterotomy is a safe and effective technique for the management of large bile duct stones and it avoids mechanical lithotripsy in the majority of cases.- Pure Cut or Endocut for Biliary Sphincterotomy? A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial(2023) FUNARI, Mateus Pereira; BRUNALDI, Vitor Ottoboni; PROENCA, Igor Mendonca; GOMES, Pedro Victor Aniz; QUEIROZ, Lucas Tobias Almeida; VIEIRA, Yuri Zamban; MATUGUMA, Sergio Eiji; IDE, Edson; FRANZINI, Tomazo Antonio Prince; SANTOS, Marcos Eduardo Lera dos; CHENG, Spencer; MINATA, Mauricio Kazuyoshi; SANTOS, Jose Sebastio dos; MOURA, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de; KEMP, Rafael; MOURA, Eduardo Guimares Hourneaux deINTRODUCTION: Adverse events (AE) after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) are not uncommon and post-ERCP acute pancreatitis (PEP) is the most important one. Thermal injury from biliary sphincterotomy may play an important role and trigger PEP or bleeding. Therefore, this study evaluated the outcomes of 2 electric current modes used during biliary sphincterotomy. METHODS: From October 2019 to August 2021, consecutive patients with native papilla undergoing ERCP with biliary sphincterotomy were randomized to either the pure cut or endocut after cannulation. The primary outcome was PEP incidence. Secondary outcomes included intraprocedural and delayed bleeding, infection, and perforation. RESULTS: A total of 550 patients were randomized (272 pure cut and 278 endocut). The overall PEP rate was 4.0% and significantly higher in the endocut group (5.8% vs 2.2%, P = 0.034). Univariate analysis revealed >5 attempts (P = 0.004) and endocut mode (P = 0.034) as risk factors for PEP. Multivariate analysis revealed >5 attempts (P = 0.005) and a trend for endocut mode as risk factors for PEP (P = 0.052). Intraprocedural bleeding occurred more often with pure cut (P = 0.018), but all cases were controlled endoscopically during the ERCP. Delayed bleeding was more frequent with endocut (P = 0.047). There was no difference in perforation (P = 1.0) or infection (P = 0.4999) between the groups. DISCUSSION: Endocut mode may increase thermal injury leading to higher rates of PEP and delayed bleeding, whereas pure cut is associated with increased intraprocedural bleeding without clinical repercussion. The electric current mode is not related to perforation or infection. Further RCT assessing the impact of electric current on AE with overlapping preventive measures such as rectal nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and hyperhydration are needed. The study was submitted to the Brazilian Clinical Trials Platform (http://www.ensaiosclinicos.gov.br) under the registry number RBR-5d27tn.
- Homemade endoscopic vacuum therapy device for the management of transmural gastrointestinal defects(2023) MOURA, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de; HIRSCH, Bruno Salomao; MCCARTY, Thomas R.; SANTOS, Marcos Eduardo dos; GUEDES, Hugo Goncalo; GOMES, Guilherme Francisco; MEDEIROS, Flaubert Sena de; MOURA, Eduardo Guimaraes Hourneaux deObjectivesEndoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) possesses a unique mechanism of action providing a less invasive alternative for the management of transmural gastrointestinal defects (TGID). This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of a novel homemade EVT (H-EVT) for the treatment of TGID. MethodsRetrospective multicenter study including patients who underwent H-EVT for TGID between January 2019 and January 2022. Main outcomes included technical and clinical success as well as safety outcomes. Subgroup analyses were included by defect location and classification. Logistic regression analyses were performed to determine predictors for successful closure. ResultsA total of 144 patients were included. Technical success was achieved in all patients, with clinical success achieved in 88.89% after a mean of 3.49 H-EVT exchanges over an average of 23.51 days. After excluding 10 cases wherein it was not possible to achieve negative pressure, successful closure occurred in 95.52% of patients. Time to clinical success was less for defects caused by endoscopic (hazard ratio [HR] 0.63; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.33-1.20) compared to surgical procedures and for patients with simultaneous intracavitary and intraluminal H-EVT placement (HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.55-0.91). Location and classification of defect did not impact clinical success rate. Simultaneous placement of both an intraluminal and intracavitary H-EVT (odds ratio 3.08; 95% CI 1.19-7.95) was a significant predictor of clinical success. Three device-related adverse events (2.08%) occurred. ConclusionsThe use of the H-EVT is feasible, safe, and effective for the management of TGID.