FELIPE HENRIQUES CARVALHO SOARES

(Fonte: Lattes)
Índice h a partir de 2011
2
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Instituto Central, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina

Resultados de Busca

Agora exibindo 1 - 3 de 3
  • article 4 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Non-invasive insular stimulation for peripheral neuropathic pain: Influence of target or symptom?
    (2022) CUNHA, Pedro Henrique Martins da; Liu Dongyang; FERNANDES, Ana Mercia; THIBES, Raissa Benocci; SATO, Joao; TANAKA, Harki; DALE, Camila; LAPA, Jorge Dornellys da Silva; MORAIS, Adriano Donizeth Silva de; SOARES, Felipe Henriques Carvalho; SILVA, Valquiria Aparecida da; GRAVEN-NIELSEN, Thomas; TEIXEIRA, Manoel Jacobsen; ANDRADE, Daniel Ciampi de
    Objectives: The posterior-superior insula (PSI) has been shown to be a safe and potentially effective target for neuromodulation in peripheral neuropathic pain (PNP) in humans and animal models. However, it remains unknown whether there is a measurable responder profile to PSI stimulation. Two factors were hypothesized to influence the response of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the PSI: differences in rTMS target (discrete subregions of the PSI) or PNP phenotype. Methods: This is a secondary analysis from a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, crossover trial assessing PSI-rTMS in PNP (N = 31, 5 days rTMS) (10.1016/j.neucli.2021.06.003). Active PSI-rTMS true responders (>50% pain reduction from baseline after active but not after sham series of treatment) were compared with not true responders, to determine whether they differed with respect to 1) rTMS neuro-navigational target coordinates, and/or 2) specific neuropathic pain symptom inventory (NPSI) clusters (pinpointed pain, evoked pain, and deep pain) at baseline. Results: Mean rTMS target coordinates did not differ between true (n = 45.1%) and not true responders (p = 0.436 for X, p = 0.120 for Y, and p = 0.116 for Z). The Euclidian distance between true and not true responders was 4.04 mm. When comparing differences in responders between NPSI clusters, no participant within the evoked pain cluster was a true responder (p = 0.024). Conclusion: Response to PSI-rTMS may depend on pain cluster subtype rather than on differences in targeting within the PSI.
  • article 1 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    The fast-posterior superior insula (Fast-PSI): A neuronavigation-free targeting method for non-invasive neuromodulation
    (2022) CUNHA, Pedro Henrique Martins da; TANAKA, Harki; LAPA, Jorge Dornellys da Silva; Liu Dongyang; SORTE JUNIOR, Anselmo Alves Boa; PEREIRA, Tamara Maria Ribeiro; SOARES, Felipe Henriques Carvalho; FERNANDES, Ana Mercia; SILVA, Valquiria Aparecida da; GRAVEN-NIELSEN, Thomas; TEIXEIRA, Manoel Jacobsen; ANDRADE, Daniel Ciampi de
  • article 9 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Pain paths among post-COVID-19 condition subjects: A prospective cross-sectional study with in-person evaluation
    (2023) KUBOTA, Gabriel T.; SOARES, Felipe H. C.; FONSECA, Alessandra S. da; ROSA, Talita dos Santos; SILVA, Valquiria A. da; GOUVEIA, Gisele R.; FARIA, Viviane G.; CUNHA, Pedro H. M. da; BRUNONI, Andre R.; TEIXEIRA, Manoel J.; ANDRADE, Daniel C. de
    BackgroundNew-onset chronic pain has been acknowledged as part of the post-COVID-19 condition. However, available fine-grained data about its clinical phenotype, trajectories and main associated characteristics remain scarce. We described the distinct temporal evolutions of post-COVID-19 pain and their epidemiological and phenotypical features. MethodsA prospective cross-sectional study enrolled post-COVID-19 condition patients (i.e. who had persisting COVID-19-related symptoms over 30 days since their first positive laboratory test), whose COVID-19 diagnosis had been supported by RT-PCR of oral/nasopharyngeal swab or serology. They underwent in-person evaluations with a structured interview, pain and quality-of-life-related questionnaires and thorough physical examination. Chronic pain (CP) and probable neuropathic pain (NP) were defined according to IASP criteria. ResultsThe present study included 226 individuals, 177 (78.3%) of whom presented over 3 months since their first COVID-19 symptom. New-onset pain occurred in 170 (75.2%) participants and was chronic in 116 (68.2%). A chronic course was associated with COVID-19-related hospitalization, new-onset fatigue, lower cognitive performance, motor and thermal sensory deficits, mood and sleep impairments and overall lower quality-of-life levels. Probable NP occurred in only 7.6% new-onset pain patients, and was associated with pain chronification, new-onset fatigue, motor and thermal sensory deficits, mechanical allodynia and lower rates of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Previous CP was reported by 86 (38.1%) individuals and had aggravated after the infection in 66 (76.7%) of them, which was associated with orthostatic hypotension. ConclusionsPost-COVID pain phenomena follow different paths, which are associated with specific clinical and epidemiological features, and possibly distinct underlying mechanisms, prognostic and therapeutic implications. SignificanceCOVID-19-related pain usually follows a chronic course and is non-neuropathic. Its possible courses and phenotypes are associated with distinct clinical and epidemiological features. This suggests differing underlying mechanisms, which may have significant prognostic and therapeutic implications.