JOSE ROBERTO FILASSI
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina
LIM/58 - Laboratório de Ginecologia Estrutural e Molecular, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina
LIM/58 - Laboratório de Ginecologia Estrutural e Molecular, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina
4 resultados
Resultados de Busca
Agora exibindo 1 - 4 de 4
- The circulating 70 kDa heat shock protein (HSPA1A) level is a potential biomarker for breast carcinoma and its progression(2022) FREITAS, Gabriela Boufelli de; PENTEADO, Laura; MIRANDA, Mila Meneguelli; FILASSI, Jose Roberto; BARACAT, Edmund Chada; LINHARES, Iara MorenoThe early diagnosis of breast cancer can improve treatment and prognosis. We sought to evaluate whether the serum concentration of the 70 kDa heat shock protein (HSPA1A) was elevated in Brazilian women with breast cancer, and if levels correlated with tumor characteristics. This was a cross-sectional, analytical, case-control exploratory study performed at The University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine. From September 2017 to December 2018, 68 women with breast cancer and 59 controls were recruited. The HSPA1A concentration in serum samples was determined by ELISA by individuals blinded to the clinical data. The mean ages in the study and control groups were 54.9 and 52.0 years, respectively. The median serum levels of HSPA1A were elevated in women with breast cancer (1037 pg/ml) compared with controls (300 pg/ml) (p < 0.001). Elevated HSPA1A levels were associated with advanced histological tumor grade (p < 0.001) and with the cell proliferation index (KI67) (p = 0.0418). The HSPA1A concentration was similar in women with different histological subtypes, nuclear grade, hormone receptor expression, HER2 status and the presence or absence of angiolymphatic invasion. Elevated serum HSPA1A in Brazilian women with advanced histological grade and proliferation index breast cancer supports the potential value of additional investigation on larger and more varied populations to verify the value of HSPA1A detection as a component of breast cancer diagnosis and progression.
- Underestimation Rate in the Percutaneous Diagnosis of Radial Scar/Complex Sclerosing Lesion of the Breast: Systematic Review(2022) ZANON, Ana Beatrice Bonganha; MAESAKA, Jonathan Yugo; CHEQUIN, Bruna Bello; SANTOS, Ana Gabriela de Siqueira; BARACAT, Edmund Chada; FILASSI, Jose RobertoObjective To evaluate the underestimation rate in breast surgical biopsy after the diagnosis of radial scar/complex sclerosing lesion through percutaneous biopsy. Data Sources A systematic review was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations. The Pub M ed, SciELO, Cochrane, and Embase databases were consulted, with searches conducted through November 2020, using specific keywords ( radial scar OR complex sclerosing lesion , breast cancer , anatomopathological percutaneous biopsy AND/OR surgical biopsy ). Data collection Study selection was conducted by two researchers experienced in preparing systematic reviews. The eight selected articles were fully read, and a comparative analysis was performed. Study selection A total of 584 studies was extracted, 8 of which were selected. One of them included women who had undergone a percutaneous biopsy with a histological diagnosis of radial scar/complex sclerosing lesion and subsequently underwent surgical excision; the results were used to assess the underestimation rate of atypical and malignant lesions. Data synthesis The overall underestimation rate in the 8 studies ranged from 1.3 to 40% and the invasive lesion underestimation rate varied from 0 to 10.5%. Conclusion The histopathological diagnosis of a radial scar/complex sclerosing lesion on the breast is not definitive, and it may underestimate atypical and malignant lesions, which require a different treatment, making surgical excision an important step in diagnostic evaluation.
- Pre-treatment MRI tumor features and post-treatment mammographic findings: may they contribute to refining the prediction of pathologic complete response in post-neoadjuvant breast cancer patients with radiologic complete response on MRI?(2022) THOMPSON, Bruna M.; CHALA, Luciano F.; SHIMIZU, Carlos; MANO, Max S.; FILASSI, Jose R.; GEYER, Felipe C.; TORRES, Ulysses S.; MELLO, Giselle Guedes Netto de; LEITE, Claudia da CostaPurpose Radiologic complete response (rCR) in breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) does not necessarily correlate with pathologic complete response (pCR), a marker traditionally associated with better outcomes. We sought to verify if data extracted from two important steps of the imaging workup (tumor features at pre-treatment MRI and post-treatment mammographic findings) might assist in refining the prediction of pCR in post-NAC patients showing rCR. Methods A total of 115 post-NAC women with rCR on MRI (2010-2016) were retrospectively assessed. Pre-treatment MRI (lesion morphology, size, and distribution) and post-treatment mammographic findings (calcification, asymmetry, mass, architectural distortion) were assessed, as well as clinical and molecular variables. Bivariate and multivariate analyses evaluated correlation between such variables and pCR. Post-NAC mammographic findings and their correlation with ductal in situ carcinoma (DCIS) were evaluated using Pearson's correlation. Results Tumor distribution at pre-treatment MRI was the only significant predictive imaging feature on multivariate analysis, with multicentric lesions having lower odds of pCR (p = 0.035). There was no significant association between tumor size and morphology with pCR. Mammographic residual calcifications were associated with DCIS (p = 0.009). The receptor subtype remained as a significant predictor, with HR-HER2 + and triple-negative status demonstrating higher odds of pCR on multivariate analyses. Conclusions Multicentric lesions on pre-NAC MRI were associated with a lower chance of pCR in post-NAC rCR patients. The receptor subtype remained a reliable predictor of pCR. Residual mammographic calcifications correlated with higher odds of malignancy, making the correlation between mammography and MRI essential for surgical planning.
- The oncological safety of autologous fat grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis(2022) GONCALVES, Rodrigo; MOTA, Bruna Salani; SOBREIRA-LIMA, Bruno; RICCI, Marcos Desiderio; JR, Jose Maria Soares; MUNHOZ, Alexandre Mendonca; BARACAT, Edmund Chada; FILASSI, Jose RobertoObjective To present a systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis evaluating the oncological safety of autologous fat grafting (AFG). Summary background data: AFG for breast reconstruction presents difficulties during follow-up radiological exams, and the oncological potential of grafted fat is uncertain. Previous studies confirmed that the fatty tissue could be transferred under a good condition suitable would not interfere with mammographic follow-up, although the issue of oncological safety remains. Methods We reviewed the literature published until 01/18/2021. The outcomes were overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and local recurrence (LR). We included studies that evaluated women with breast cancer who undergone surgery followed by reconstruction with AFG. We synthesized data using the inverse variance method on the log-HR (log of the hazard ratio) scale for time-to-event outcomes using RevMan. We assessed heterogeneity using the Chi(2) and I-2 statistics. Results Fifteen studies evaluating 8541 participants were included. The hazard ratios (HR) could be extracted from four studies, and there was no difference in OS between the AFG group and control (HR 0.9, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.54, p = 0.71, I-2 = 58%, moderate certainty evidence), and publication bias was not detected. The HR for DFS could be extracted from six studies, and there was no difference between the AFG group and control (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.38, p = 0.96, I-2 = 0%, moderate certainty evidence). The HR for LR could be extracted from ten studies, and there was no difference between the AFG group and control (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.12, p = 0.43, I-2 = 1%, moderate certainty evidence). Conclusion According to the current evidence, AFG is a safe technique of breast reconstruction for patients that have undergone BC surgery and did not affect OS, DFS, or LR.