Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the WHO Violence Against Women Instrument in Pregnant Women: Results from the BRISA Prenatal Cohort

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
15
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2014
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
Autores
RIBEIRO, Marizelia Rodrigues Costa
ALVES, Maria Teresa Seabra Soares de Britto E
BATISTA, Rosangela Fernandes Lucena
RIBEIRO, Cecilia Claudia Costa
BARBIERI, Marco Antonio
BETTIOL, Heloisa
SILVA, Antonio Augusto Moura da
Citação
PLoS One, v.9, n.12, article ID e115382, 16p, 2014
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Background: Screening for violence during pregnancy is one of the strategies for the prevention of abuse against women. Since violence is difficult to measure, it is necessary to validate questionnaires that can provide a good measure of the phenomenon. The present study analyzed the psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Violence Against Women (WHO VAW) instrument for the measurement of violence against pregnant women. Methods: Data from the Brazilian Ribeirao Preto and Sao Luis birth cohort studies (BRISA) were used. The sample consisted of 1,446 pregnant women from Sao Luis and 1,378 from Ribeirao Preto, interviewed in 2010 and 2011. Thirteen variables were selected from a self-applied questionnaire. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to investigate whether violence is a uni-or-multidimensional construct consisting of psychological, physical and sexual dimensions. The mean-and-variance- adjusted weighted least squares estimator was used. Models were fitted separately for each city and a third model combining data from the two settings was also tested. Models suggested from modification indices were tested to determine whether changes in the WHO VAW model would produce a better fit. Results: The unidimensional model did not show good fit (Root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] = 0.060, p<0.001 for the combined model). The multidimensional WHO VAW model showed good fit (RMSEA=0.036, p=0.999 for the combined model) and standardized factor loadings higher than 0.70, except for the sexual dimension for SL (0.65). The models suggested by the modification indices with cross loadings measuring simultaneously physical and psychological violence showed a significantly better fit compared to the original WHO model (p<0.001 for the difference between the model chi-squares). Conclusions: Violence is a multidimensional second-order construct consisting of psychological, physical and sexual dimensions. The WHO VAW model and the modified models are suitable for measuring violence against pregnant women.
Palavras-chave
Referências
  1. Alhabib S, 2010, J FAM VIOLENCE, V25, P369, DOI 10.1007/s10896-009-9298-4
  2. Brazil, 2011, POLITICA NACL ENFREN, P19
  3. Campbell J, 2004, VIOLENCE AGAINST WOM, V10, P770, DOI 10.1177/1077201204265551
  4. Cobertura de consultas de pre-natal: Ribeirao Preto, 2011, BAS DAD DATASUS
  5. Ellsberg M., 2005, RES VIOLENCE WOMEN P
  6. Garcia-Moreno C, 2005, WHO MULTICOUNTRY STU
  7. Kline R. B., 2011, PRINCIPLES PRACTICE
  8. Nybergh L, 2013, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V10, P1
  9. Programa das Nacoes Unidas para o Desenvolvimento Instituto de Pesquisa Economica Aplicada Fundacao Joao Pinheiro, 2013, PERF MUN RIB PRET SP
  10. Schraiber LB, 2010, REV SAUDE PUBL, V44, P658, DOI 10.1590/S0034-89102010000400009
  11. Shamu S., 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, P1
  12. Taillieu TL, 2010, AGGRESS VIOLENT BEH, V15, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.avb.2009.07.013
  13. United Nations, 1994, DECL EL VIOL WOM
  14. WANG J., 2012, STRUCTURAL EQUATION
  15. World Health Organization, 2013, GLOB REG EST VIOL WO
  16. World Health Organization, 2005, WHO MULT STUD WOM HL
  17. World Health Organization, 2000, EST MULT SAUD MULH V